Killingworth
Established Member
Isn't it time we stripped this man of his names completely? Far too much to type.
Henceforth let him be known as AMW.
Henceforth let him be known as AMW.
You will note the name of the person now shown in the title of this thread.Isn't it time we stripped this man of his names completely? Far too much to type.
Henceforth let him be known as AMW.
I think the point being made wasn't about titles, but rather that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is, at 27 characters, too much to type.You will note the name of the person now shown in the title of this thread.
Absolutely. I can see which facet of Andrew’s behaviour has the greater weight of evidence for arrest currently. Based on that, I wonder what powers the police will seek to mine the email chain from Andrew’s end?When you're going after someone like Andrew you want to make sure that you're choosing offences you're extremely confident about. You don't want to mess this up! Plus lets not forget that they got Capone on tax evasion rather than his litany of other crimes.
Quite, if that has to go in every reference to the man it adds further nausea to the affairs.You will note the name of the person now shown in the title of this thread.
I think the point being made wasn't about titles, but rather that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is, at 27 characters, too much to type.
AMW is the three-letter station code for the Indian Railways station of Amanwadi.Henceforth let him be known as AMW.
Also, now that he's been charged with one offence (which they are pretty confident of securing a conviction for) his emails, etc. become fair game for investigation in order to build the case, and if it so happens that they find evidence of additional crimes...Those type of offences are generally a lot easier to prove in a court of law, see Al Capone and tax evasion.
Has he been charged? I can only see he's been arrested so far?Also, now that he's been charged with one offence (which they are pretty confident of securing a conviction for) his emails, etc. become fair game for investigation in order to build the case, and if it so happens that they find evidence of additional crimes...
Has he been charged? I can only see he's been arrested so far?
Charles I might have something to say about that.Was the arrest of the future Queen Elizabeth during the reign of Queen Mary the last time that a "royal" of such status had been arrested?
Indeed so. Of course, the punishments suffered by both Charles I and Queen Mary are not likely to be repeated in the 21st century.Charles I might have something to say about that.
I think it was coincidence. Starmer was quoted earlier stating ‘no one is above the law’ and I feel that my have been relevant in that he knew it was about to happen.I wonder if someone timed the arrest deliberately for that reason?
A good place for charity work in exile?AMW is the three-letter station code for the Indian Railways station of Amanwadi.
I’ve said before that it wasn’t a good look for the King to be harbouring Andrew at Sandringham but never thought it would end quite as badly as this for ‘the firm’ .
I can see it now if he gets banged up.Gone from being a guest of His Majesty to potentially being a 'guest of His Majesty'?
BrotherGets into a fight with an inmate. "My dad runs this place!"
And Andrew replies ‘my brother owns it’.I can see it now if he gets banged up.
Gets into a fight with an inmate. "My dad runs this place!"
Ugh yes, I was imagining a, "My dad's bigger than your dad!", situation and got carried awayBrother
Despite the royal precedents mentioned earlier -if anything comes to a criminal court, this will surely be the first formal “Rex vs “Lil’ Bro” under the proper rule of law!And Andrew replies ‘my brother owns it’.![]()
Didn’t Princess Anne get convicted of speeding a couple of times, many years ago? So not actually the first criminal case against a Royal.Despite the royal precedents mentioned earlier -if anything comes to a criminal court, this will surely be the first formal “Rex vs “Lil’ Bro” under the proper rule of law!
She was convicted of failing to control her dog at a magistrates court. However, I'm not sure this would have necessarily involved her being arrested, merely being sent a summons to appear in court.Didn’t Princess Anne get convicted of speeding a couple of times, many years ago? So not actually the first criminal case against a Royal.
how will he cope sleeping in custody without his perfectly-arranged teddy bear collection?
She was convicted of failing to control her dog at a magistrates court. However, I'm not sure this would have necessarily involved her being arrested, merely being sent a summons to appear in court.
King and Palace not told about Andrew arrest in advance, BBC understands
Neither King Charles nor Buckingham Palace were informed in advance that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was to be arrested today, BBC News understands.
The King released a statement reacting to his brother's arrest a short while ago, which you can read in full here.
"more severe offences" - misconduct in public office carries a max sentence of life imprisonment! I get your point entirely (and agree), but important to note that the suspected offence is possibly one of THE most serious/severe there is in terms of the law.Wow, I'm quite impressed. I imagined him to eventually disappear from the headlines and get away with it.
Admittedly this is for misconduct in public office rather than any of the potentially more severe offences.
If Andrew is convicted of this offence, there could be an Al Capone-esque outcome here, who was done for tax evasion, not any of the mafia stuff."more severe offences" - misconduct in public office carries a max sentence of life imprisonment! I get your point entirely (and agree), but important to note that the suspect offence is possibly one of THE most serious/severe.