markymark2000
On Moderation
That isn't what was said.Mark's point seems to be that buses should just do the busy corridors with many times that per hour and ignore that kind of market -
I do not (and have never) advocated for a commercial only approach with no tendering. What do however advocate for public funds to be spend wisely and I will call out where money is being wasted. In the 201 case, withdrawing it would leave not a single bus stop unserved. The 136 would leave poorly used bus stops unserved but I'd instead push for running a separate route similar to a slimmed down former 101 which served the housing estates where there was good amounts of proven demand (not profitable, but it wasn't a dead duck)if I understand rightly, he effectively advocates for a commercial-only approach to buses with no tendering at all and prioritisation of resources based on maximum profit.
There are many good routes in Merseyside which are tendered and ran largely ok and there are some positive changes to what is currently the tendered network.
