East Yorkshire Motor Services, now part of Go-Ahead

[Eyersey468]

It's Manchester & Merseyside (Chester even) technically not just Manchester, they get registered at Birkenhead when they come off the ferries aiui

Aah thank you for the explanation

 

[WibbleWobble]

It's Manchester & Merseyside (Chester even) technically not just Manchester, they get registered at Birkenhead when they come off the ferries aiui

Chester uses D (Deeside) registrations.

 

[Zenneth101]

Seeing as nobody has said it yet; Procters 21046 904 YUF has been seen on the 900 Tesco Contract operated by main East Yorkshire.

Apparently something to do with a Rail Replacement and EY needing extra coaches.

 

[YorkRailFan]

Seeing as nobody has said it yet; Procters 21046 904 YUF has been seen on the 900 Tesco Contract operated by main East Yorkshire.

Apparently something to do with a Rail Replacement and EY needing extra coaches.

Looks like Esk Valley 23013 (N12 ESK) & 23027 (PO68 BYJ) are also on lease to East Yorkshire, as both have been tracking on the BC1 between Scarborough & Bishop Burton today.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 14 Jan 2026 ==

B5LH 20820 is now in service. Esk Valley Volvo B9R 23012 ESK 793 also on loan to EY.

 

[Fox192]

Just seen on Facebook the first ey electric 20315 MA75 CME has arrived over the ferry at the docks credit Jerome Fulton

Friends of Buses and Coaches | East Yorkshire 20315 MA75 CMV (AX086) seen having arrived from Belfast this evening aboard Stena Embla during a foggy evening | Facebook

East Yorkshire 20315 MA75 CMV (AX086) seen having arrived from Belfast this evening aboard Stena Embla during a foggy evening. Feel free to share but please credit me thank you, 15/1/2026

www.facebook.com

 

[BusPerson2025]

The reg seems to be MA75 CMV According to that Facebook post. I started thinking about what reg plates would the 2026 GB kites would be…

Does anyone know why Volvo B9R Plaxton panther Compass royston N33 CRT (possibly) is On loan to East Yorkshire??

 

[YorkRailFan]

EvoSeti 20816 is on loan to Metrobus tracking as 816.

Also, does anyone know what's up with EvoSeti 20809? It hasn’t tracked since November 2025.

 

[liamf656]

20311 MA75 CME
20312 MA75 CMF
20313 MA75 CMO
20314 MA75 CMU
20315 MA75 CMV
20316 MA75 CMX
20317 MA75 CMY
20318 MA75 CMZ
20319 MA75 CNA
20320 MA75 CNC
20321 MA75 CNE

Where have you got this info? MA75 CMK has been registered and was wondering the fleet number

 

[BusPerson2025]

Where have you got this info? MA75 CMK has been registered and was wondering the fleet number

Oh sorry, just guessing the regs for the electric buses after seeing that Facebook post

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 17 Jan 2026 ==

Ok, I looked at motorscan and I realized that None of the GB kites were registered with CME.

So here’s the actual list:

20311 MA75 CMF
20312 MA75 CMK
20313 MA75 CMO
20314 MA75 CMU
20315 MA75 CMV
20316 MA75 CMX
20317 MA75 CMY
20318 MA75 CMZ
20319 MA75 CNA
20320 MA75 CNC
20321 MA75 CNE

 

[markymark2000]

North Yorkshire Council has released details for some upcoming changes to East Yorkshires network in Scarborough on 15th Feb

Bus service changes and news

Latest news and notifications of planned changes to bus routes and timetables.

www.northyorks.gov.uk

Route X3 is being withdrawn and 128 (renumbered to 28) is being cut back to 2 hourly. Seems their competition against Viscount was a waste of time.
Route 4 is seemingly going on full sightseeing tour of North Scarborough to the Sealife centre
Route 5 to be replaced by a new 9X
Route 9 & 10 no longer serving Field Lane (Field lane now served on 9X and on the 4)
Route 12 is extending to Peasholm Park via North Marine Road.
Route 4, 7/7A, 8 all have revised timetables

 

[BusPerson2025]

East Yorkshire 75 plate Wright Electroliner Fleet list

20930 MF75 ENW
20931 MF75 ENW
20932 MF75 ENX
20933 MF75 ENY
20934 MF75 EOA
20935 MF75 EOB
20936 MF75 EOC
20937 MF75 EOD
20938 MF75 EOE
20939 MF75 EOG

 

[Fox192]

East Yorkshire 75 plate Wright Electroliner Fleet list

20930 MF75 ENW
20931 MF75 ENW
20932 MF75 ENX
20933 MF75 ENY
20934 MF75 EOA
20935 MF75 EOB
20936 MF75 EOC
20937 MF75 EOD
20938 MF75 EOE
20939 MF75 EOG

Is that confirmed or is that another expected list

 

[sbrignall72]

EvoSeti 20816 is on loan to Metrobus tracking as 816.

Also, does anyone know what's up with EvoSeti 20809? It hasn’t tracked since November 2025.

There was one parked up near the eailwsyside yesterday with an advert for Skys Bunny Munro, so whether it is that one been away for repair.

 

[YorkRailFan]

East Yorkshire Enthusiasts reports that Streetdeck 20939 (MV75 EOG) is now at Anlaby Road.
Photo: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1440153418119767&set=a.477189894416129&locale=en_GB

 

[EYFanatic]

I noticed that the 35 is being retimed (again) according to bustimes.org... Is there an updated timetable for it as the EYMS site doesn't seem to have it or is it too early?

 

[Eyersey468]

I noticed that the 35 is being retimed (again) according to bustimes.org... Is there an updated timetable for it as the EYMS site doesn't seem to have it or is it too early?

The changes come in during February I believe

 

[EYFanatic]

The changes come in during February I believe

Yes, I just wondered if the website's timetable page for the 35 shows it if you adjust the times or if it will be later

In other possible EYMS updates and changes, I suppose the good news is that if they run the Moorsbus again (hopefully with less breakdowns compared to 2025), it starts on Good Friday which is April 3rd unless they do Bank Holidays and Sundays only

 

[trawler]

Moorsbus has been really successful and the service will be enhanced. Good team effort between East Yorkshire, Moorsbus, East Riding of Yorkshire Council and Hull City Council.

 

[markymark2000]

I noticed that the 35 is being retimed (again) according to bustimes.org... Is there an updated timetable for it as the EYMS site doesn't seem to have it or is it too early?

Legally the data should already be being sent to Bus Open Data, but the good folk at East Yorkshire think that open data laws don't apply to them, and thus haven't updated in time (data is now 2 weeks late)

Yes, I just wondered if the website's timetable page for the 35 shows it if you adjust the times or if it will be later

It won't as they havent uploaded that information to the website yet.

 

[YorkRailFan]

In other possible EYMS updates and changes, I suppose the good news is that if they run the Moorsbus again (hopefully with less breakdowns compared to 2025), it starts on Good Friday which is April 3rd unless they do Bank Holidays and Sundays only

Dalesbus is set to start on 5th April (Easter Sunday) so we'll see if EY will continue to run the 822 from Pocklington.

Legally the data should already be being sent to Bus Open Data, but the good folk at East Yorkshire think that open data laws don't apply to them, and thus haven't updated in time (data is now 2 weeks late)


It won't as they havent uploaded that information to the website yet.

EY's data (incorrectly) displays the 18 running out of York via Waggons & Horses and then Hull Road, instead of Fulford Road. In fact, only one journey on the 18 is inputted as running along Fulford Road.

On Saturdays only, the data (incorrectly) shows the first 84 of the day (leaving Green Hammerton) as running to Boroughbridge via Marton, Grafton & Aldborough, which again it doesn't, it runs directly along the B6525. Only the 82 & 83 serve Marton, Grafton & Aldborough.

EY hasn't even published details of the service changes yet, they're usually late to do so, and timetables usually only come after that.

 

[175mph]

Legally the data should already be being sent to Bus Open Data, but the good folk at East Yorkshire think that open data laws don't apply to them, and thus haven't updated in time (data is now 2 weeks late)


It won't as they havent uploaded that information to the website yet.

Is that why sometimes when there's timetable changes and I go on Google Maps and select one of the stops for that route, it can go for weeks saying 'No upcoming departures'?

 

[markymark2000]

EY's data (incorrectly) displays the 18 running out of York via Waggons & Horses and then Hull Road, instead of Fulford Road. In fact, only one journey on the 18 is inputted as running along Fulford Road.

It's only Saturdays that the 18s are messed up and show as running out via Hull Road and even then the first and last trips show normally via Fulford Road. Not sure where you are seeing different?

I know that I am others are fed up of reporting such issues. Sadly they don't give a stuff and the GoAhead Group Data Manager and Director of Bus refuse to hold them accountable.
East Yorkshire are just a shambles now and reminds me very much of Go East Anglia with their lack of care for anything and everything. Then again, do we really expect much better when the commercial team is headed up by someone who was 'head of network and efficiency' at First West Yorkshire for 5 and half years prior to joining EY.

 

[YorkRailFan]

It's only Saturdays that the 18s are messed up and show as running out via Hull Road and even then the first and last trips show normally via Fulford Road. Not sure where you are seeing different?

Ah, used to be also on weekdays so something has been done evidently.

East Yorkshire are just a shambles now and reminds me very much of Go East Anglia with their lack of care for anything and everything. Then again, do we really expect much better when the commercial team is headed up by someone who was 'head of network and efficiency' at First West Yorkshire for 5 and half years prior to joining EY.

When I complained regarding the lack of service updates, Ben Gilligan personally (in an email) directed me to the personalised travel alerts. These are just notifications of service updates, and if there are no service updates there are no travel alerts. Really frustrating.

 

[NorthOxonian]

Is that why sometimes when there's timetable changes and I go on Google Maps and select one of the stops for that route, it can go for weeks saying 'No upcoming departures'?

I think that's just down to data issues more broadly as opposed to specifically around service changes - a couple of the Go North East routes had a similar problem of not showing on Google Maps for a good few days earlier this month, despite being unchanged. I would imagine the issues are related because GNE and EY presumably use similar back office systems, having been so closely intertwined during the 2018-2022 period.

 

[JeffBus]

It's only Saturdays that the 18s are messed up and show as running out via Hull Road and even then the first and last trips show normally via Fulford Road. Not sure where you are seeing different?

I know that I am others are fed up of reporting such issues. Sadly they don't give a stuff and the GoAhead Group Data Manager and Director of Bus refuse to hold them accountable.
East Yorkshire are just a shambles now and reminds me very much of Go East Anglia with their lack of care for anything and everything. Then again, do we really expect much better when the commercial team is headed up by someone who was 'head of network and efficiency' at First West Yorkshire for 5 and half years prior to joining EY.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 18 Jan 2026 ==

Are you slandering this person, or the role he held at FWY?

 

[Lynford1976]

It's only Saturdays that the 18s are messed up and show as running out via Hull Road and even then the first and last trips show normally via Fulford Road. Not sure where you are seeing different?

I know that I am others are fed up of reporting such issues. Sadly they don't give a stuff and the GoAhead Group Data Manager and Director of Bus refuse to hold them accountable.
East Yorkshire are just a shambles now and reminds me very much of Go East Anglia with their lack of care for anything and everything. Then again, do we really expect much better when the commercial team is headed up by someone who was 'head of network and efficiency' at First West Yorkshire for 5 and half years prior to joining EY.

I think you need to calm down, @markymark2000.

 

[Delenn]

It's only Saturdays that the 18s are messed up and show as running out via Hull Road and even then the first and last trips show normally via Fulford Road. Not sure where you are seeing different?

I can't find this at all. Where exactly is this data you're seeing?

 

[markymark2000]

Is that why sometimes when there's timetable changes and I go on Google Maps and select one of the stops for that route, it can go for weeks saying 'No upcoming departures'?

Google maps has many different data sources and as it's not transparent about where it gets it's data from, I wouldn't want to comment. Where I can and will happily criticise them though is on their open data on both BODS and their website open data page (which is the same information that is in their website and app)

Are you slandering this person, or the role he held at FWY?

Slandering would be to make false comments, which I'm not. First West Yorkshire didn't really care for anything during the time that he was head of network, other than when WY Metro was leading something (Ie Leeds City). And the same is happening now at East Yorkshire since he joined, a lack of care for anything. He put on his Linkedin that he was 'responsible for legal compliance' at FWY, but yet East Yorkshire is still failing to send data to BODS within the legal timeframe (and when they do, there are bugs with it) and Proctors still hasn't updated their data once since East Yorkshire took over. That's not slander, it's facts backed up by BODS (https://data.bus-data.dft.gov.uk/timetable/?organisation=401&status=live) and that is despite multiple registration changes since then.

I can't find this at all. Where exactly is this data you're seeing?

18 - Holme-on-Spalding-Moor to York, via Wheldrake

Timetable for 18 - Holme-on-Spalding-Moor to York, via Wheldrake

www.eastyorkshirebuses.co.uk

 

[JeffBus]

Google maps has many different data sources and as it's not transparent about where it gets it's data from, I wouldn't want to comment. Where I can and will happily criticise them though is on their open data on both BODS and their website open data page (which is the same information that is in their website and app)


Slandering would be to make false comments, which I'm not. First West Yorkshire didn't really care for anything during the time that he was head of network, other than when WY Metro was leading something (Ie Leeds City). And the same is happening now at East Yorkshire since he joined, a lack of care for anything. He put on his Linkedin that he was 'responsible for legal compliance' at FWY, but yet East Yorkshire is still failing to send data to BODS within the legal timeframe (and when they do, there are bugs with it) and Proctors still hasn't updated their data once since East Yorkshire took over. That's not slander, it's facts backed up by BODS (https://data.bus-data.dft.gov.uk/timetable/?organisation=401&status=live) and that is despite multiple registration changes since then.

18 - Holme-on-Spalding-Moor to York, via Wheldrake

Timetable for 18 - Holme-on-Spalding-Moor to York, via Wheldrake

www.eastyorkshirebuses.co.uk

So the organisation not the individual.

 

[markymark2000]

So the organisation not the individual.

Organisation which the individual is a director. And as a director who was "responsible for legal compliance" in his previous role, should know about BODS compliance and to consistently fail to comply with it, is shocking behaviour. There are firms now being fined and having their licences cut over open data issues. The fact that hasn't nudged him to sort things out, says a lot about him and his lack of care.