• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Leeds station improvement updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Rikki Lamb

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2019
Messages
113
I'm not convinced there's space for a centre footbridge that reaches everywhere without reducing platform widths significantly, especially on the 9-11 island.

But let's think big. The new, accessible (I'd say lifts and steps rather than escalators, for space reasons) footbridge replaces the existing eastern footbridge. It extends through part of WH Smith's, with a new gate line so that people can 'cut the corner' which also eases pressure on the existing gate line. It's wide enough for the usual outlets, meaning a couple can move from the western footbridge (plus the shop on the existing 12-15 island).
There is no room for another footbridge, totally agree. I always thought it a shame they closed the subway, even though it is still there.
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
3,025
At least the Hallam line (well Castleford, Normanton and Wakefield Kirkgate) now has the excellent Transpenine Express route in place between York and Manchester so half the time I don't even need to worry about Leeds or Platform 17 or Class 150s to begin with!
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,552
Considering the subway is still there how accessible is it these days and whereabouts is it situated? Is it accessible to station staff?
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,842
Considering the subway is still there how accessible is it these days and whereabouts is it situated? Is it accessible to station staff?
Only part of the subway still exists, it's very much inaccessible with access only from underneath the station via a ladder. The access to the platforms is concreted over.

It would be to be totally rebuilt to be used again.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

PXL_20240411_000339825.jpgPXL_20240411_000143427.jpgPXL_20240411_000322417.jpgPXL_20240411_000438183.jpg
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,227
Location
Yorks
Oh yes, the stinky toilets of yore :lol:

It looks more or less intact from your photos, however I'm guessing the staircases to the platforms have been built over.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
Oh yes, the stinky toilets of yore :lol:

It looks more or less intact from your photos, however I'm guessing the staircases to the platforms have been built over.
It's the landing point for the present steps and escalators. This photo in my 'acquired' collection gives you an idea; the booths are roughly where the present gate line is.

We call it a subway, it's really a tube slung between the arches!
 

Attachments

  • 2023-08-13-16-44-010.jpg
    2023-08-13-16-44-010.jpg
    470.3 KB · Views: 184

takno

Verified Rep - Traksy
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,574
It's the landing point for the present steps and escalators. This photo in my 'acquired' collection gives you an idea; the booths are roughly where the present gate line is.

We call it a subway, it's really a tube slung between the arches!
It's quite a long way in front of the present escalators, though that places it right in the way, and arguably too close to the barriers for the numbers of people going through them now. Realistically if you were going to bring it back into use you'd have to relocate virtually all the steps, and add an extension to platform 16/17, which isn't going to work out cheaper than anything.

It's a pity that Railtrack had an obsession with replacing subways with big high bridges which required twice as many steps to get to them, but we are where we are.

If it was possible to sling a new tube in the location they are suggesting for a new bridge then that would be great, but I think cost probably rules that out, and the difficulty of siting steps/lifts is just as bad for a subway as it is for a bridge
 

Tge1435

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
14
Location
Northumberland
Works over the next few years will include:

Demolition works, replacement of the existing roof structure over the south concourse, breakthrough & access through to the dark arches below the station, an additional new overbridge across the main platforms, new entrance to south bank at Neville Street and external public realm works.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,227
Location
Yorks
Works over the next few years will include:

Demolition works, replacement of the existing roof structure over the south concourse, breakthrough & access through to the dark arches below the station, an additional new overbridge across the main platforms, new entrance to south bank at Neville Street and external public realm works.

I thought they'd already replaced the roof over the south concourse !
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,663
Location
West Riding
A bit random, but does anyone know what’s going on with the HTA wagons on Whitehall curve just outside Leeds?
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,663
Location
West Riding
Works over the next few years will include:

Demolition works, replacement of the existing roof structure over the south concourse, breakthrough & access through to the dark arches below the station, an additional new overbridge across the main platforms, new entrance to south bank at Neville Street and external public realm works.
…one day, Leeds station will be finished.
Stored - awaiting sale or scrapping - following the end of large scale coal haulage in this country.
Thanks, they’re a bit of an eyesore.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
…one day, Leeds station will be finished.

Thanks, they’re a bit of an eyesore.
Fixed that for you ;)

What looks like a double-height bus shelter has been installed at the front of the station, where the new taxi rank will go. I'm hoping for a 2026 finish to the work but there's a lot to go. New paving being added on Bishopgate Street and New Station Street though, which is a generally good sign.
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,552
Those HTA wagons are in storage in quite a number of places including Leeds, there's 2 sets stored in Collyhurst Street sidings near Manchester and another set stored near Stoke-On-Trent station.
 

Grumpy

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2010
Messages
1,311
I'm not convinced that Leeds needs another footbridge.

Turning the service exit on platform 8 into an exit gateline for passengers off the Eastern footbridge would be a cheaper option to improve flows out of the station (this used to be done in peak hours before the barriers went in).
Could better use be made of platforms 1-8, i.e. avoiding the need for so many passengers to use the footbridge?
Thus Kings Cross trains restricted to platforms 1-6 and platform 8 focussed on Eastbound through services would shift some of the busier trains to platforms not requiring bridge access.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
Could better use be made of platforms 1-8, i.e. avoiding the need for so many passengers to use the footbridge?
Thus Kings Cross trains restricted to platforms 1-6 and platform 8 focussed on Eastbound through services would shift some of the busier trains to platforms not requiring bridge access.
Platform 5 was supposed to be extended to 260m-plus, to take 10-car Azumas. That would allow LNER to use P5 & P6 for most of the day, freeing up P8 to through traffic. I don't know if the extension actually happened, and I've never seen an LNER set on P5.

Platform 8 would be good for CrossCountry to use in both directions, except they used to cross at Leeds (I think they still do in the new timetable). Northbound they used to call at P8; southbound it was P9, P11, P12 or P15, if it was or other services were late.
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,830
Platform 5 was supposed to be extended to 260m-plus, to take 10-car Azumas. That would allow LNER to use P5 & P6 for most of the day, freeing up P8 to through traffic. I don't know if the extension actually happened, and I've never seen an LNER set on P5.
I've not heard of this proposal before. I can't see how it could be done without closing P4. It would need to extend another 60m which as you can see from the photo below causes problems. The basic issue is the tracks are all very tight between P1 and P6 with the ends of those platforms forming an immovable constraint. There is a gap between P3 and P4 but that's due to the difference in level between them.

1769075299338.png
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,853
Location
Beeston (Notts)
I've not heard of this proposal before. I can't see how it could be done without closing P4. It would need to extend another 60m which as you can see from the photo below causes problems. The basic issue is the tracks are all very tight between P1 and P6 with the ends of those platforms forming an immovable constraint. There is a gap between P3 and P4 but that's due to the difference in level between them.

View attachment 196374
There would need to be yet another redesign of the OLE at the western throat to accommodate that.
 

Grumpy

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2010
Messages
1,311
Platform 5 was supposed to be extended to 260m-plus, to take 10-car Azumas. That would allow LNER to use P5 & P6 for most of the day, freeing up P8 to through traffic. I don't know if the extension actually happened, and I've never seen an LNER set on P5.

Platform 8 would be good for CrossCountry to use in both directions, except they used to cross at Leeds (I think they still do in the new timetable). Northbound they used to call at P8; southbound it was P9, P11, P12 or P15, if it was or other services were late.
The Sectional Appendix still shows platform 5 as 219m which is clearly too short for a 10 car. But is this really a major problem? I looked at Realtime Trains for one day this week and only three departures were 10 cars. Platforms 1 and 6 should be long enough for the 9/10 coach trains and all of 1-6 should handle the half dozen or so 5 cars . Still leaves 4 platforms for Airedale/Wharfedale/Harrogate.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
Looking (searching!) upthread, it seems P5 being extended to cater for 10-car set was discussed, but no-one actually pointed to an external document...

 

notspy

Member
Joined
1 Mar 2023
Messages
60
Location
Manchester
Are there any plans to solve the pinch point between P16-17? Trains leaving P16 are often delayed by a minute or two due to large passenger flows leaving P17.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
Are there any plans to solve the pinch point between P16-17? Trains leaving P16 are often delayed by a minute or two due to large passenger flows leaving P17.
The railings along the platform edge I've been suggesting for the past 10 years would do the job, but the consultation into the P17 extension suggested that the lift would be moved or turned in some manner, allowing more circulation space, with the end of P17 being further back in the shed.
 

Top