• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ugliest looking tram fleet in service today.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,191
Location
0035
I think all second generation trams look good. They are modern and sleek and make the areas they serve look really smart and pleasant.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Worst? Probably should start looking through the Czech and Polish fleets and those in Eqypt I would say.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,191
Location
0035
Does that include the T-68s in Manchester?;)
Yes. The presence of the rails in the street and the overhead wires, and these swift electric vehicles carrying masses of people effortlessly and efficiently around Manchester makes the place seem like a forward-thinking city with an almost continental feel to it.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,060
Location
Reston City Centre
Where does modern start in your definition?

Personally, I think modern EuroTrains often look better than UK trains, but that's just my opinion.

For arguments sake, since rail privatisation/ the opening of the Sheffield/Manchester trams - I think most trams since that time look fairly sleek. Trains are getting bulkier/ more awkward/complicated looking.
 

gnolife

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
2,047
Location
Johnstone
Personally, I dont think the Manchester M5000s look that good, really dont suit the colour scheme. But I don't think the appearance of them is what counts - I'd get on a cardboard box on wheels if it got me to college quicker than walking!
 

futureA

Member
Joined
24 May 2010
Messages
121
Personally, I dont think the Manchester M5000s look that good, really dont suit the colour scheme. But I don't think the appearance of them is what counts - I'd get on a cardboard box on wheels if it got me to college quicker than walking!

I kind of see your point with the m5000s. While I don't think the livery is particularly bad, I think in 10 years time it might look as dated as the t68's do now.
I don't mind the colours but its the dots that I fear might not have a long shelf life.

Saying that, maybe I am wrong. The virgin trains livery has similarities (coloured cab, silver body) and I still that that looks fresh 9 years after it was introduced. But, I think the actual trams look great. I also like the new signage and the unified brand. The new stations of the south manchester line look pretty stunning in my view.

As for the t68's, I can't stand them from a purely aesthetic standpoint. The interiors look cluttered and worn and the exteriors are becoming even more ugly with the addition of the coupler covers, a/c units and other modifications. Plus they are filthy and scruffy looking. However, RATP have said that cleaning will be one of their priories so maybe this will change.
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire
For arguments sake, since rail privatisation/ the opening of the Sheffield/Manchester trams - I think most trams since that time look fairly sleek. Trains are getting bulkier/ more awkward/complicated looking.

I'd agree that UK trains are going that way, on the continent many local trains seem to have moved towards "tram styling". Examples being the Stadler FLIRT, Siemens Euro Desiro and Alstom Coradia LINT. All could be said to have elements of tram design.
 

snail

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
1,911
Location
t'North
the ones in Hannover & San Diego are a bit manky, as are the ancient ones in Berlin
The Berlin and original San Diego trams I think are the same type. The newer San Diego trams are pretty modern Siemens units. Bland but not ugly.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,461
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
True, but have a look at Alstom's answer to the class 153:, as ordered by SNCF, DB and CFL. Can you imagine that turning up on the branches of Britain?

What is the seating capacity in 1st and 2nd class and the standing capacity in these single units? Do you have any pictures of the interior of them?

They must have something going for them if SNCF, DB and CFL have ordered them.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
They have a lot of lines suitable for single car operation, most of our lines of similar provence have moved to two car units or will do if given the chance.
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire
What is the seating capacity in 1st and 2nd class and the standing capacity in these single units? Do you have any pictures of the interior of them?

They must have something going for them if SNCF, DB and CFL have ordered them.

DB's version seats 55 passengers in 2nd class (in addition to 17 tip-up seats in the bicycle storage area) and 8 in 1st class.

As WatcherZero says, there is still scope in Europe for single-car operations, and perhaps unlike the UK, these countries do tend to purchase new stock for such operations. These units will also run in multiple if required, despite the lack of corridor connections. Occasionally seen in a 3 unit formation - HERE.

I struggled to find an interior picture but there is one HERE. A transparent glass screen separates the driver's compartment, rather like the first generation British DMUs! The units often have a ticket machine onboard for small stations without purchasing facilities.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top