Kennel
New Member
Is the thousands of tons of replaced rail lying next to the permanent way worth so little that it is not worth recycling?
Definitely, less hazards, less for vandals.Surely it is better to cost money and recycle rather than leaving clutter on the railway?
Precisely. I hate clutter.Definitely, less hazards, less for vandals.
That's quite common on canals around the country.... presumably dating from the days when the canals were owned by railway companies.I saw the canal near Gloucester has used old rail to reinforce the bank recently!
Well a skip cost me a good amount to take away builders rubble from works on my house, didn't even get anything for it. Guess I should have just thrown it all out in the road.Scrap steel is about £120/tonne, and I think a tonne is a 60ft length. Imagine the cost of collecting the steel would significantly outweigh any cash return.
How is that comparable, you don't own the road. If you said you chucked it on your own drive and left it because you didn't fancy paying for a skip then maybe.Well a skip cost me a good amount to take away builders rubble from works on my house, didn't even get anything for it. Guess I should have just thrown it all out in the road.
I wish Network Rail did this for every junction in the Lewisham area.Sometimes the rail has been dropped ready for a future re-railing but not used yet, or has been replaced but not yet removed, due to limited time within the possession or other logistical constraints. Critical junctions may have spare switches and crossings left alongside so if one fails it can be replaced quickly. So rail that may appear to have been abandoned may not in fact be.
No apparently its better to save money today even if it'll end up costing more money later on (see also the disgraceful state of vegetation on the network).Surely it is better to cost money and recycle rather than leaving clutter on the railway?
Leaving vegetation to grow means that the problem gets worse. Unused rails don't cause much of a problem if they are left in place. You might be able to clear them away with some others in the future, and then you will have saved some money.No apparently its better to save money today even if it'll end up costing more money later on (see also the disgraceful state of vegetation on the network).
Part of the problem is the way that budgest are often linked to defined time periods of spend.No apparently its better to save money today even if it'll end up costing more money later on (see also the disgraceful state of vegetation on the network).
But of course it'll be someone else's problem by then.
NR generally does clear the rails to recycling as shown by how much rail *isnt* left to the side.Surely it is better to cost money and recycle rather than leaving clutter on the railway?
Probably costs as much to recover it.
If you need to be on site anyway, grabbing it while you're there is a lot easier to arrange than a specific trip.It has to be moved at some point though, like when it's time to replace sleepers and ballast etc?
If I understand correctly, the Cornish re-signalling did not include recoveries to keep costs down. Hence several redundant posts, wire runs and rod runs remains in place at Par and Lostwithiel. Could this be the case why so much old rail is left lying around?If you need to be on site anyway, grabbing it while you're there is a lot easier to arrange than a specific trip
This is what tends to happen around here. If machines are out, say for a switch replacement, any spare time is used to collect scrap. Gets the money's worth out of the machines as well.If you need to be on site anyway, grabbing it while you're there is a lot easier to arrange than a specific trip.
A (probably rather tortured) comparison could be that you go out shopping and cant find something, but are short on time so have to leave it and get home. Most people wouldnt make a specific trip back out for just one item, but if you passed by the shop on the way home from work you might pop in the next evening on your way past to grab it.
The rails would be moved to a safe position before the line is handed back. However rails weigh upwards of 56kg/m, they're not going to suddenly jump around. The bigger danger of rails not being collected is to lineside staff with rails stacked in the cess.Does anyone want to put a price on the cost of a length of rail left on the track that caused a fatal derailment?
The Southern was expert at recycling before the term had been invented. Conversions of loco hauled stock into multiple units and power cars into goods brake vans were other specialities! No doubt other uses for redundant rail were found in addition to signal posts.The Southern used to make signal posts from old rail.
buffer stops and fencing were also made from old rails.The Southern was expert at recycling before the term had been invented. Conversions of loco hauled stock into multiple units and power cars into goods brake vans were other specialities! No doubt other uses for redundant rail were found in addition to signal posts.
Just bear in mind that as recently as last year there was a high speed derailment near Walton-on-Thames because of a botch-up as part of a scrap rail recovery operation. So it has to be done properly. In a hurry, at night, in a bit of slack time from another job completed swiftly isn’t always a good idea.Does anyone want to put a price on the cost of a length of rail left on the track that caused a fatal derailment?
Yes, until pretty recently some of the fencing in Hackbridge station car park was made of old rail painted yellow:buffer stops and fencing were also made from old rails.