Uncle Buck
Member
It has a slightly desperate feel to it.Absolutely, but the Government doesn't want to bring that back because it would make sense. It always has to be GREATER because it's this government wanting to look compotent
It has a slightly desperate feel to it.Absolutely, but the Government doesn't want to bring that back because it would make sense. It always has to be GREATER because it's this government wanting to look compotent
Yeah, exactly. It's like going 'we're great now I promise' 'we are so much better than things before' and to be honest it does nothing but making the feeling around using the word great in things absolutely feel tacky. You don't be great by just saying you're great. British Rail as a set of words for a name is direct, clear and with no pompous and egotistical connotations.It has a slightly desperate feel to it.
Yep, Rail England with the Greater Anglia livery and branding would have looked so sophisticated!I would much prefer 'Rail England' if we really can no longer have British Rail anymore. Besides, it probably better suits the fact that this is purely an England rebrand as TfW and SR are staying.
Have this terrible render from me of a prospective look with a 465. Covering up various bits of the NSE livery seemed to be all the rage in the late 90s.Yep, Rail England with the Greater Anglia livery and branding would have looked so sophisticated!
And all of other light grey or white based stock could have been re-branded quickly with an interim livery, simply vinyl covering the blue area on Northern or South Western for example with grey and red areas and new Rail England branding.
Meanwhile, back in the real world…

So what would the staff at Kings Cross have on their uniform? Infrastructure and passenger train operations are being knitted together. Drivers and signallers now report to the same director at South Eastern Railway, and so do fleet and infrastructure engineers. We'll see the old boundaries being broken down more and more over the next few years, and the idea that different staff within the same department will wear different logos is very odd.Train England and Network Rail could work as two complimentary organisations under a single ownership, just different brands
From Norweigan to Icelandic!(picture is of an LNER 80X Azuma with the livery changed from white to blue)
Really like that and I knew it reminded me of sth!!Finally got Gemini to play ball and extend the livery along the side - user error.
(picture is of an LNER 80X Azuma with the livery changed from white to blue)
That was my concern when it comes to doing a more English-based design idea, but I would still much prefer two red and white liveries over the obsession with the Union Jack. I agree it would be different to have it primarily red. Agree with all of your points too. Why is Wales represented as Wales, Scotland as Scotland, yet England is British... We also had Public Health England which then became "UK Health Security Agency" despite Wales and Scotland having their own bodies with the old 'Public Health (country)' name. The only thing I can come up with is obviously the negative connotations that might be related to using 'English', but if someone has an issue with those, they probably have an equal hatred for 'British' too.I reckon "Rail England" should have a predominantly red livery with white detailing as a white livery with red detailing is already in use by TfW as the two could get confused?
It isn't a problem for Greater Anglia as theirs & TfW's fleets are hardly seen at the same time.
"Rail England" could work if it is a TOC or passenger service of GBR. While the rest such as Network Rail etc would be all GBR as they also manage infrastructure in Wales & Scotland. "National Rail" should signify TfW in Wales, ScotRail in Scotland and Rail England (GBR) in England plus the devolved operators.
Rail England trains could have a small wordmark "operated by GBR" with the double arrow signs.
Bletchleyite is right, there are no issues with TfW & ScotRail trains crossing the border so why not English ones? This English self-punishing & apologising really must stop as after all this what the country is called as the new GBR operated services replacing the TOCs really only applies to England.
This absurdity also could be seen with "National Highways" which does not operate outside England so what was wrong with its previous name "Highways England" which was more appropriate. Same for Scottish & Welsh branded milk sold in supermarkets but "British Milk" for sale in England.
The political correctness of deeming England/English as toxic and forcing the globalised British label on us is ridiculous so why this is not done to the Welsh & Scots.
This actually looks quite excellent even though I'm not a fan of the LNER livery. I think the fact it's not primarily white works in it's favour.Finally got Gemini to play ball and extend the livery along the side - user error.
(picture is of an LNER 80X Azuma with the livery changed from white to blue)
Reminds me of Intercity, only the whole unit appears to be formed of catering vehicles.Talk of a "Rail England" brand gave me the idea to create an English-themed livery for Northern services that will be absorbed by GBR. Not to toot my own horn too loudly but I actually think it has this subtle Englishness that works despite looking similar to Transport for Wales. I think the red line alone the body along with the doors helps to create a sort of St. George's flag look. Originally I wanted to put add some distinctiveness to some sets with Lancashire and Yorkshire roses but they turned out too small to notice.
Or just British Rail…The brand name "Rail Britain" or "Rail England" would've been a much better name, or even better, just keep the existing franchise / regional identities under government ownership.
But since 2016 everything has had to be "Great Britain" and "world beating" etc.......
The old-established political parties have been ashamed of “England” and “English” for a good many years whilst the Scots Nd the Welsh have become more proud of their heritage — which all leaves the field wide open for the Reform lot and others like them.That was my concern when it comes to doing a more English-based design idea, but I would still much prefer two red and white liveries over the obsession with the Union Jack. I agree it would be different to have it primarily red. Agree with all of your points too. Why is Wales represented as Wales, Scotland as Scotland, yet England is British... We also had Public Health England which then became "UK Health Security Agency" despite Wales and Scotland having their own bodies with the old 'Public Health (country)' name. The only thing I can come up with is obviously the negative connotations that might be related to using 'English', but if someone has an issue with those, they probably have an equal hatred for 'British' too.
Reminds me of Intercity, only the whole unit appears to be formed of catering vehicles.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Moving away from flag-based designs, I mocked up an IET in LNER Coronation livery.
In a technical sense because they will be railways operating on the island of Great Britain, hence why they were called Great British Railways, and it fits in alongside Northern Ireland Railways (or perhaps Great Britain Railways would've been the better name in that case).What I’m getting at here is that the name isn’t so slick, many European operators have some variation of ‘national/country rail/ways in some capacity, why do we have to add the unnecessary ‘great’ onto something that will almost definitely not be ‘great’ but will be ‘ok, I guess, idk I only use it once or twice a week’ or ‘it’s absolutely rubbish, the train is late and the seats are tiny’
Aside from Enrail or an English-only name, I mean BNRC like the French is the only way we could go as all of the others are just going back to British Rail(ways). It is almost like that name was figured out for very good reasons a long time ago, we just refuse to use it because we always must be 'greater'The names not very slick, we could change that maybe
Enrail?
Brittrack?
Great British railway journeys?
National rail?
Supertrain?
We could steal the name they use in Germany, Deutsche Bahn (would be British rail in our case, sounds all to familiar
Pinch from the French and call it the British National Railway Company (BNRC)
Pinch from the Spanish (Renfe) which would be National Network of British railways
The Dutch have Nederlandse Spoorwegen (Dutch railways) which would be British railways for us…
What I’m getting at here is that the name isn’t so slick, many European operators have some variation of ‘national/country rail/ways in some capacity, why do we have to add the unnecessary ‘great’ onto something that will almost definitely not be ‘great’ but will be ‘ok, I guess, idk I only use it once or twice a week’ or ‘it’s absolutely rubbish, the train is late and the seats are tiny’
Rail Britannia?The names not very slick, we could change that maybe
Enrail?
Brittrack?
Great British railway journeys?
National rail?
Supertrain?
Quite, quite tired of the political cycle of conservatives doing stupid/bad things and then Labour comes along and then turns said things up to 11 using what the conservatives have started. I would say more but that would be off-topic. But it is pretty much everywhere.At risk of veering off topic like one of the overturned HGVs on the M74 during Storm Bram - the reason England was dropped from Highways England and Public Health England was nothing to do with wishing to avoid using England in names - it was part of the last Tory Government's strategy of 'Muscular Unionism' as unleashed by Boris Johnson and Alastair Jack.
Next year this Labour government will probably rename National Highways to Great British Roads. Motorways will stay blue but be numbered G*** for the 'great roads', Trunk/Primary roads will see green replaced by red and A will be replaced by B*** for 'British roads' and existing B roads will become R for 'Regional roads' and keep their white signs.
The A1(M) will become the B1(G) - its a really big important road after all.
That's pretty good actually. I've found it quite tricky to get a livery that flows equally as well on both a Pendolino and an IET but you've managed it quite nicely here. This could also work as a livery for a non-GBR company as well in my opinion.I hope people don't mind me joining in the discussion. This is my own idea for the brand taking inspiration from LNER, Chiltern and the previous Intercity Swallow livery.
This would be the livery for all Intercity/Express services and could be modified for the service it provides i.e GBR CrossCounty, GBR Transpennine Express or just known as GBR Intercity. The regional look would be slightly different similar to the Chiltern livery on a Class 172 & 196.
That looks fantasticI hope people don't mind me joining in the discussion. This is my own idea for the brand taking inspiration from LNER, Chiltern and the previous Intercity Swallow livery.
This would be the livery for all Intercity/Express services and could be modified for the service it provides i.e GBR CrossCounty, GBR Transpennine Express or just known as GBR Intercity. The regional look would be slightly different similar to the Chiltern livery on a Class 172 & 196.
That looks fantastic

My absolute favourite so far! Excellent work!Here is my redesign!
I decided to keep the colour pallet the same and retain the sharp angles but I made the livery more appealing (for me at least) to look at.
I created an alternative livery variants for both ‘Long distance’ and ‘Local’ trains and brought back sectors because I think they look nice.
Any thoughts?
View attachment 193804
Here is my redesign!
I decided to keep the colour pallet the same and retain the sharp angles but I made the livery more appealing (for me at least) to look at.
I created an alternative livery variants for both ‘Long distance’ and ‘Local’ trains and brought back sectors because I think they look nice.
Any thoughts?
View attachment 193804