• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Footbridge costs

Status
Not open for further replies.

jthjth

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2015
Messages
382
On the regional news tonight there was an item about a fatality on a foot crossing. The item quoted costs of £1 million to add traffic lights for pedestrians and £4.5 million for a footbridge. How does a footbridge cost anything like £4.5 million? The news item stated these were costs given by Network Rail.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jthjth

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2015
Messages
382
How much would you charge?
I’ve no idea. But in context, a new housing estate is being built near me. For the price of that footbridge you can buy 10 four bedroom houses, all built in a field that required services, roads etc.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,014
Location
West Wiltshire
In Europe figures of €3 - €4m are commonly quoted (£2.64m-£3.52m)

A few years ago, there was interest in composite modular footbridges.

This linked document is interesting background (7 years ago), where the idea that the more you mass produce them, the cheaper the unit price comes.

Of course, modular standard components are not new, Southern Railway installed hundreds of footbridges made of modular concrete components replacing foot crossings
 
Last edited:

mcmad

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2015
Messages
1,072
But those houses aren't being built around a live railway line restricting working hours to a handful each week
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,260
Location
Bath
I’ve no idea. But in context, a new housing estate is being built near me. For the price of that footbridge you can buy 10 four bedroom houses, all built in a field that required services, roads etc.
Railway requires specialist contractors, foundations in potentially sensitive area, potentially moving of at least signalling cables, closures to install, almost always access by rail to a remote location.

Very different to building 20 identical houses in a flat field, where you can work the hours you want, build a massive road to it and if you mess up it just messes up your schedule.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,934
Depending on location, might the footbridge have to be wheelchair accessible? If so, there would need to be either long ramps, if there's room enough, or two lifts to be paid for.
 

jthjth

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2015
Messages
382
In Europe figures of €3 - €4m are commonly quoted (£2.64m-£3.52m)

A few years ago, there was interest in composite modular footbridges.

This linked document is interesting background (7 years ago), where the idea that the more you mass produce them, the cheaper the unit price comes.

Of course, modular standard components are not new, Southern Railway installed hundreds of footbridges made of modular concrete components replacing foot crossings
Thanks for that link, it makes interesting reading.
 

fat_boy_pete

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2015
Messages
355
Location
Essex
This current project https://www.greateranglia.co.uk/stowmarketfootbridge , currently built but awaiting installation for a new Modular design, has a project cost of £5.5m (assuming they are still on budget).

Looking further, it appears to have been put into position this weekend, awaiting opening in January, according to this article in New Civil Engineer. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/la...nstalled-at-stowmarket-this-month-12-11-2025/ and as the article states, as a repeatable design, the more that are ordered, the cheaper the unit cost will be. But I won't hold my breath for the flood of orders for that to actually happen.
 
Last edited:

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,303
Location
Somerset
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/la...nstalled-at-stowmarket-this-month-12-11-2025/ and as the article states, as a repeatable design, the more that are ordered, the cheaper the unit cost will be. But I won't hold my breath for the flood of orders for that to actually happen.
Though presumably the cost savings from a modular design come less from actual “quantity discount” than from the fact that each project just needs to say “I need 5 of part A, 3 part B, 1 part C and 234 part H -oh and pick up a spare Allen Key thing-y while you’re there” rather than designing a bespoke bridge from scratch every time? ( Massive simplification of course - I’d hate to see the IKEA assembly instructions for whatever they’d call a footbridge!)
 

sannox

Member
Joined
1 Mar 2016
Messages
649
Depends what is allowed for. Land acquisition can also be expensive.

Can't really compare to housebuilding which is a different beast in terms of scale / complexity.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,303
Location
Somerset
Depends what is allowed for. Land acquisition can also be expensive.

Can't really compare to housebuilding which is a different beast in terms of scale / complexity.
The only true comparator would be installing a footbridge over an existing motorway (remembering to add in the time costs for diversions which are just “absorbed” by road users but have to be paid /accounted for on the railway.)
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,652
Location
Solihull
It all depends on what is included in the cost. The actual physical components will only be a small part of the cost unlike in some other things you can try and compare the bridge to.
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
On the regional news tonight there was an item about a fatality on a foot crossing. The item quoted costs of £1 million to add traffic lights for pedestrians and £4.5 million for a footbridge. How does a footbridge cost anything like £4.5 million? The news item stated these were costs given by Network Rail.

Given the amount of steel, the usual need to have large ramps as well, cost of land, planning, and that you've got a working 24/7 railway, because you've got freights at (presumably) Burton Joyce through the night too, it all adds up. Build 10 of them in a row and the price would be much cheaper per unit too. Housing estates, per house, are quite good cost wise. Building one bridge is akin to building a new house in a field, which is very expensive per unit compared to building an estate.

If it is Burton Joyce I can't really see a bridge being built there. It'd take up a decent proportion of the pub car park on one side, extend onto the flood defences the other side (again, increasing cost, it'd probably have to be rebuilt to take the weight) and anyone using it would have a cracking view into the upstairs of the nearby houses, and pub. Really it should have closed years ago, there another foot crossing, an underpass and a level crossing all within spitting distance, but the local parish council apparently keeps objecting, probably someone with happy memories of using it to go fish in the Trent as a child or something.....:s
 
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
959
This current project https://www.greateranglia.co.uk/stowmarketfootbridge , currently built but awaiting installation for a new Modular design, has a project cost of £5.5m (assuming they are still on budget).

Looking further, it appears to have been put into position this weekend, awaiting opening in January, according to this article in New Civil Engineer. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/la...nstalled-at-stowmarket-this-month-12-11-2025/ and as the article states, as a repeatable design, the more that are ordered, the cheaper the unit cost will be. But I won't hold my breath for the flood of orders for that to actually happen.

I think the above goes a long way to explaining why they cost so very much... this is a much more sophisticated structure with lots of utilities than comes to mind when one thinks of a "footbridge". The above structure looks ideal for, for example, new suburban stations in major cities - particularly if you're building a few stations at once to a similar spec. The Camp Hill line stations in Birmingham spring to mind as a possible example.

But it's far more than comes to mind when I think of the "footbridges" of my youth, in rural locations over lines, which were essentially just some steps and a deck. If that type of product costs millions of pounds then something's clearly awry. Or is it just not possible to provide such a simple product these days?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
But it's far more than comes to mind when I think of the "footbridges" of my youth, in rural locations over lines, which were essentially just some steps and a deck. If that type of product costs millions of pounds then something's clearly awry. Or is it just not possible to provide such a simple product these days?
Remember that the quoted costs are not just for procuring the product, but installing it as well. That means everything from planning permission to land take to crane hire is included in the costs.
 

fat_boy_pete

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2015
Messages
355
Location
Essex
I think the above goes a long way to explaining why they cost so very much... this is a much more sophisticated structure with lots of utilities than comes to mind when one thinks of a "footbridge". The above structure looks ideal for, for example, new suburban stations in major cities - particularly if you're building a few stations at once to a similar spec. The Camp Hill line stations in Birmingham spring to mind as a possible example.

But it's far more than comes to mind when I think of the "footbridges" of my youth, in rural locations over lines, which were essentially just some steps and a deck. If that type of product costs millions of pounds then something's clearly awry. Or is it just not possible to provide such a simple product these days?

I think you should be aware that Stowmarket is a sizeable town and rail head, with 5 or 6 departures in the off peak hours plus 2 or 3 freight passes. So for this station location a footbridge with lifts is much needed. Using the barrow crossing with staff assistance is really not appropriate in this day and age.

The sort of location suitable for a simple footbridge is covered by this earlier design
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
I think you should be aware that Stowmarket is a sizeable town and rail head, with 5 or 6 departures in the off peak hours plus 2 or 3 freight passes. So for this station location a footbridge with lifts is much needed. Using the barrow crossing with staff assistance is really not appropriate in this day and age.

The sort of location suitable for a simple footbridge is covered by this earlier design

The trouble with that type is they're good for rural footpaths, where nobody's really going to be using a wheelchair, but if it's the one I'm thinking it is at Burton Joyce, which has been in the news recently, I imagine it would need ramps too, which significantly push up the cost.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,014
Location
West Wiltshire
Depends what is allowed for. Land acquisition can also be expensive.
There are not that many locations (if any) that the fence is so tight to the running line, that can't actually find room on embankment or approach footpath for bridge supports / steps
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,303
Location
Somerset
There are not that many locations (if any) that the fence is so tight to the running line, that can't actually find room on embankment or approach footpath for bridge supports / steps
Being even more pedantic than usual, how far can a footpath be moved from its mapped position without official consent? A footbridge of the station type (ie steps at right angles to the bridge) would mean that either the bridge deck was no longer on the old alignment or the path would have to deviate to reach the bottom of the steps. A straight line alignment would require land take for the steps since a right of way is no more than that.
Personally, I would regard any challenge to a realignment for a footbridge mischievous but the law is an odd beast! At least there are no current plans for a footbridge at Altnabreac!
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,260
Location
Bath
Being even more pedantic than usual, how far can a footpath be moved from its mapped position without official consent? A footbridge of the station type (ie steps at right angles to the bridge) would mean that either the bridge deck was no longer on the old alignment or the path would have to deviate to reach the bottom of the steps. A straight line alignment would require land take for the steps since a right of way is no more than that.
Personally, I would regard any challenge to a realignment for a footbridge mischievous but the law is an odd beast! At least there are no current plans for a footbridge at Altnabreac!
You cannot move a footpath at all. Even if you put a bridge on the exact allignment you would still need to seek consent from the council. Technically you cannot even put a gate across a footpath without permission.
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
Being even more pedantic than usual, how far can a footpath be moved from its mapped position without official consent? A footbridge of the station type (ie steps at right angles to the bridge) would mean that either the bridge deck was no longer on the old alignment or the path would have to deviate to reach the bottom of the steps. A straight line alignment would require land take for the steps since a right of way is no more than that.
Personally, I would regard any challenge to a realignment for a footbridge mischievous but the law is an odd beast! At least there are no current plans for a footbridge at Altnabreac!

I'm sure several years ago somewhere in the West Midlands, possibly Whitacre, Railtrack had complaints that freight trains stood in a loop were obstructing a footpath, so, built a footbridge, however the same complainant then complained they couldn't move the footpath, and the law sided with them, so Railtrack, then Network Rail, now had a footbridge, a footpath, and a restriction on the length of trains that could use the loop without obstructing the footpath!
 

jthjth

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2015
Messages
382
You cannot move a footpath at all. Even if you put a bridge on the exact allignment you would still need to seek consent from the council. Technically you cannot even put a gate across a footpath without permission.
It’s not impossible to get the required council permission. Round here a foot crossing, which was part of a long standing public footpath, was replaced by a footbridge. The path leading up to it will get moved by about 25 metres soon because of a new housing estate. The council solicitor notices are pinned up nearby.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,260
Location
Bath
It’s not impossible to get the required council permission. Round here a foot crossing, which was part of a long standing public footpath, was replaced by a footbridge. The path leading up to it will get moved by about 25 metres soon because of a new housing estate. The council solicitor notices are pinned up nearby.
Absolutely, it isn't at all hard, especially for something like a level crossing replacement, but it does need to be approved.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,303
Location
Somerset
Absolutely, it isn't at all hard, especially for something like a level crossing replacement, but it does need to be approved.
And adds to costs. In the example given two posts ago , the landowner (presumably a building company) is likely to be amenable to moving the path to accommodate new houses. Other landowners may well be less accommodating and anything that requires permission invites delaying tactics by people who object to more than just the detail change being requested.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,624
I'm sure several years ago somewhere in the West Midlands, possibly Whitacre, Railtrack had complaints that freight trains stood in a loop were obstructing a footpath, so, built a footbridge, however the same complainant then complained they couldn't move the footpath, and the law sided with them, so Railtrack, then Network Rail, now had a footbridge, a footpath, and a restriction on the length of trains that could use the loop without obstructing the footpath!
The houseowner also put a floodlight out to shine at locos stopped in the loop as well I believe at Whitacre. A bridge wasn't built.
 

Henffordd

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2023
Messages
109
Location
The Marches
It’s not impossible to get the required council permission. Round here a foot crossing, which was part of a long standing public footpath, was replaced by a footbridge. The path leading up to it will get moved by about 25 metres soon because of a new housing estate. The council solicitor notices are pinned up nearby.
It's possible, but takes time and adds to the cost. I had reason to move 30 metre of a footpath recently (not rail-related). Took 18 months and cost me more than £2 000 - paid to the local authority. And I had to do all the work on consents myself.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,571
To add further colour, when all the footpaths level crossings were closed on the WCML during the upgrade, a deal was done with a steel fabricator to supply x bridges to a broadly standard design (varied by length and rise) over the course of two years. A favourable proce was negotiated as they could be fabricated at any time during those two years (in a priority order) to fill in ’troughs’ in the fabricator’s order book. Sort of like an off peak advance.

Even then, the highest cost component was the legals of getting the crossings actually closed and footaghs diverted onto the bridge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top