#1167 says correct ship.So which vessel is it then? Do share the info if you are saying post above is wrong.
#1167 says correct ship.So which vessel is it then? Do share the info if you are saying post above is wrong.
Those kind of subtly smug corrections really boil my p*ss - either help, or don’t!So which vessel is it then? Do share the info if you are saying post above is wrong.
Big move happening!
99003 and 99004 being prepared for departure in Barcelona on Friday.
Next stop: The UK!
@bristol_port
Credit to Facebook poster "GB Railfreight"www.facebook.com

It must be such a sad existence for people like Ron when everything they see, they have to turn into a political gameView attachment 192780
Took me a while to get it open so, just to save others the effort, I screen printed it.
Picture of 99004 (just legible) and 99003 inside what appears to be a roll-on roll-off ship on non-road trailers.
In the picture you can see how the lamp bracket and grab handle obscures part of the locomotive number that is on the front lower right as you look at the locomotive. Compare 99004 bad angle with 99003 good angle of view.
You could say that most of the heavy haul freight, especially coal, ceased, leading to a short life for 56/58/60s. It was a case of either the 89 or the class 91..the class 91 won. But around that time British Rail was actively looking to get rid of freight traffic. That saw far more locos available than neededThe last British-built freight locomotives haven’t been that successful, have they? Classes 56, 58, and 60. Class 92 have probably been used less than expected, and so have Class 90s recently. Class 89 never got beyond a single example, which wasn’t used a ton. Class 91 didn’t haul freight as planned.
Who does this really impact though? The number is clear on the cab side and tbh if you're standing dead ahead of the loco it's either not moving and you can change your viewing angle, or you need to be getting out of the way of the loco!Appreciate this is a relatively minor gripe, but the positioning of the numbers on the front end of the 99's is a bit annoying as there seems to be some sort of handle that obscures the number from certain angles.
I was hoping they'd address it with the livery tweaks for 99003 onwards, but as the above image shows you can't see the number on 99004 properly.
When do you think they will be arriving in the UK? And will they be headed for Leicester?View attachment 192780
Took me a while to get it open so, just to save others the effort, I screen printed it.
Picture of 99004 (just legible) and 99003 inside what appears to be a roll-on roll-off ship on non-road trailers.
In the picture you can see how the lamp bracket and grab handle obscures part of the locomotive number that is on the front lower right as you look at the locomotive. Compare 99004 bad angle with 99003 good angle of view.
According to https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9974101When do you think they will be arriving in the UK? And will they be headed for Leicester?
I don't know about where they'll go once in the UK.The vessel is en route to the port of Bristol, United Kingdom (UK), sailing at a speed of 14.6 knots and expected to arrive there on Nov 26, 18:00.
If i were betting, I'd guess they'll go to Leicester for Commisioning before any mileage accumulation runs are even considered to take placeAccording to https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9974101
I don't know about where they'll go once in the UK.
It wasn't a head-to-head in the sense of it being a direct competition between Brush Traction and GEC. But that's beside the point anyhow.It was a case of either the 89 or the class 91..the class 91 won.
If you are travelling on a train looking out the window as a 99 comes the opposite way the number on the front is the only one you have a chance of seeing.Who does this really impact though? The number is clear on the cab side and tbh if you're standing dead ahead of the loco it's either not moving and you can change your viewing angle, or you need to be getting out of the way of the loco!
Whilst that is true Peter, it is only really the very small number of people who show an interest in loco numbers. For the rest of us it is not really relevant. Many years ago at the beginning of privatisation I was a TCS at Bescot for Transrail. On a shift basis we were responsible for allocating locos to work in conjunction with the power control, and one job we had involved a BS driver booking on around 1700ish to work 6S75 to Warrington and 6M27 back. These trains were the last vestiges of a Speedlink Dover-Mossend service (cant remember the headcode) but the loco and driver diagram worked 6M27 Mossend-Bescot back.If you are travelling on a train looking out the window as a 99 comes the opposite way the number on the front is the only one you have a chance of seeing.
Ha ha.Whilst that is true Peter, it is only really the very small number of people who show an interest in loco numbers. For the rest of us it is not really relevant. Many years ago at the beginning of privatisation I was a TCS at Bescot for Transrail. On a shift basis we were responsible for allocating locos to work in conjunction with the power control, and one job we had involved a BS driver booking on around 1700ish to work 6S75 to Warrington and 6M27 back. These trains were the last vestiges of a Speedlink Dover-Mossend service (cant remember the headcode) but the loco and driver diagram worked 6M27 Mossend-Bescot back.
This diagram involved one of "our" class 60s as a fill in between MGR coal train work. At that time there was a Mainline Freight class 60 diagram which worked a 42 set of coal hoppers on a MidCannock - Rugeley flow - 2 or 3 trips a day, which sat at Bescot unused in the between trips. This loco was controlled by the Nottingham Mainline fleet and did very little else in the week.
The driver booked on with me and I gave him the loco number and the road it was on in the holding sidings and he wrote the number on his fag packet. Off he went to go and get the loco ready, and unusually for me I didn't visibly check the loco as it went off the sidings to go and back up on the train - because something more pressing was going on.
Much later, call from Warrington to say that "we" had allocated the wrong loco to 6S75 and we would have to hire it from Mainline. It turns out that despite me verbally giving the driver the number, and the road it as on, and him scribbling the number on his fag packet, he still took the wrong loco. To make maters worse, the shunters never checked the loco number the driver had was the one allocated in TOPS and on the train list.
This explains how much some people notice loco numbers !!
-SEControl
I’m sure Wyrleybart does. You have fine Railwaymen in your family. BS was a good training ground.@Wyrleybart you must have known my dad Mick Knowles and uncle John Poxon. (sorry off topic)
Two very fine train drivers and railwaymen and I worked with both at Bescot and at XC. In fact I was only thinking the other day of the last time I got on a 58 was with John, working the empties from Garston back to Kingsbury - so many years ago !!!@Wyrleybart you must have known my dad Mick Knowles and uncle John Poxon. (sorry off topic)
I imagine it needed turningEither 99001 or 99002 (or both) had a very small trip out from Leicester depot today via Croft, Wigston South Jn and then back to Leicester depot. Does anyone know for sure which 99's were involved and if the route described is correct? Given the way the schedule reports the passing times, I think they went to Croft first (instead of last as booked) and Wigston South Jn last (instead of first as booked).
Realtime Trains | 0Q99 1144 Leicester L.I.P. to Leicester L.I.P. | 27/11/2025
Real-time train running information for 0Q99 1144 departure from Leicester L.I.P. to Leicester L.I.P. on 27/11/2025. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
It is perfectly fine for the intended customer and staff. Why would they change it for train spotters?Appreciate this is a relatively minor gripe, but the positioning of the numbers on the front end of the 99's is a bit annoying as there seems to be some sort of handle that obscures the number from certain angles.
I was hoping they'd address it with the livery tweaks for 99003 onwards, but as the above image shows you can't see the number on 99004 properly.
GB Railfreight is at The Bristol Port Company.
1h ·Bristol ·
An early Christmas present from Valencia has arrived!
99003 and 99004 arrived yesterday at The Bristol Port Company’s, Royal Portbury Dock.
@bristol_port
#Class99 #GBRf GBRailfreightp
The picture of them next to the docks railway track is slightly teasingTaken from their social media
![]()
GB Railfreight | London
GB Railfreight, London. 18,949 likes · 696 talking about this · 129 were here. GBRf is the largest rail freight operator in the UK. We keep the UK moving and the lights turned on. This is a place...www.facebook.com
003 and 004 have arrived in the UK
They've aligned the two trailers next to each other very well in that shot, it looks like 1 very wide trailer!The picture of them next to the docks railway track is slightly teasing![]()