• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Haymarket to Dalmeny electrification

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

EastFifer

Member
Joined
22 May 2015
Messages
32
Does anyone know if they’re electrifying the whole Fife Circle or is it still Plan A?
I.e. Kinghorn/Lochgelly to Ladybank?
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,110
Does anyone know if they’re electrifying the whole Fife Circle or is it still Plan A?
I.e. Kinghorn/Lochgelly to Ladybank?
There hasn’t been any suggestion that there will be full electrification. Just the “four arms” centred on Thornton.
 

TrainViation

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2025
Messages
294
Location
Glenrothes
There hasn’t been any suggestion that there will be full electrification. Just the “four arms” centred on Thornton.
Pretty much just now yes, but they did mention it’s an interim scheme, and they want to fully electrify in the future. Hopefully by 2035 or 2040.

I think the main issues with the inner circle are the Forth Bridge to Inverkeithing and the Kinghorn tunnel. Both would require significant alterations or modifications.

As I’m pretty sure this was discussed before, the Scottish government were testing different things on the bridge over a three year period between 2022 and 2025, but nothing has came out about it so far. We just need to see how the the UNESCO people and locals deal with the idea of masts and wires over the bridge…
 
Last edited:

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,694
Location
Scotland
We just need to see how the the UNESCO people and locals deal with the idea of masts and wires over the bridge…
I'm pretty sure that UNESCO would be fine with it, as long as it's done sympathetically. It is, after all, listed as a world heritage site specifically because it represents industrial/engineering excellence, rather than being a work of art.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,110
Pretty much just now yes, but they did mention it’s an interim scheme, and they want to fully electrify in the future. Hopefully by 2035 or 2040.

I think the main issues with the inner circle are the Forth Bridge to Inverkeithing and the Kinghorn tunnel. Both would require significant alterations or modifications.

As I’m pretty sure this was discussed before, the Scottish government were testing different things on the bridge over a three year period between 2022 and 2025, but nothing has came out about it so far. We just need to see how the the UNESCO people and locals deal with the idea of masts and wires over the bridge…
I recall those "in the know" have said several times that there is no issue with the Forth Bridge. Given the whole bridge is comprised of a complexity of steel girders, I cannot imagine for one moment that the introduction of catenary would make a material visual impact, especially from the distance at which the bridge is typically viewed.
 

TrainViation

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2025
Messages
294
Location
Glenrothes
I recall those "in the know" have said several times that there is no issue with the Forth Bridge. Given the whole bridge is comprised of a complexity of steel girders, I cannot imagine for one moment that the introduction of catenary would make a material visual impact, especially from the distance at which the bridge is typically viewed.
I've heard a number of mixed answers from everyone I've spoken to about it, but it's all been opinions I reckon. I've always thought it wouldn't have been a heritage issue.

Also a bit off THAT topic, but there's a new double mast next to Lennymuir in the gap next to the airport. Seems to be one more mast left to fill in there and only two others before the line is fully connected!
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,510
Location
Preston Lancs
There hasn’t been any suggestion that there will be full electrification. Just the “four arms” centred on Thornton.
About 5 years ago, Scotland published documents saying eventually (2035/2040) the plan was to electrify the whole thing. Imho they are taking the sensible approach of doing it bit by bit. Good to see whatever happens.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,110
About 5 years ago, Scotland published documents saying eventually (2035/2040) the plan was to electrify the whole thing. Imho they are taking the sensible approach of doing it bit by bit. Good to see whatever happens.
I'm aware of that, but by use of the present tense "they're electrifying" the question appeared to be phrased in terms of the electrification now under way, and I answered accordingly.
 

TrainViation

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2025
Messages
294
Location
Glenrothes
Speaking of this again, I'm guessing this closure will be for track lowers around bridges to allow OHLE under?

Just wondering, now that I’ve confused myself a bunch tonight.
Does the Haymarket to Dalmeny electrification includes electrification up to Dalmeny station itself? Because I’ve convinced myself that the wires end jut before there.
I have a photo of where the masts currently end just south of Dalmeny junction, does that mean the masts won’t continue on to the station in this project?

Adding onto that, does this tunnel look like it has enough clearance for wires to go under? It looks like there would be enough space but I'm on the fence a bit.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7370.jpeg
    IMG_7370.jpeg
    60.3 KB · Views: 114
  • image_2025-10-26_173716111.png
    image_2025-10-26_173716111.png
    677.5 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,694
Location
Scotland
Adding onto that, does this tunnel look like it has enough clearance for wires to go under? It looks like there would be enough space but I'm on the fence a bit.
It looks like it to me.

Some very rough pixel counting: the red line is 70 pixels which gives 20.5cm per pixel. The blue line is 260 pixels which is 5.3m. The standard structure clearance for a 100mph railway is, according to this thread, 4.6m.image_2025-10-26_173716111.png

Edit: I wrote the wrong pixel counts above, but the final result is still 5.3m.
 
Last edited:

TrainViation

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2025
Messages
294
Location
Glenrothes
It looks like it to me.

Some very rough pixel counting: the red line is 70 pixels which gives 20.5cm per pixel. The blue line is 260 pixels which is 5.3m. The standard structure clearance for a 100mph railway is, according to this thread, 4.6m.
Thanks for the rough calculation, definitely gives us more confidence that it won't need to be modified in the future.
I've gotten a better photo here just in case, though the camera is a bit warped through barrel distortion. I'll try and look for other official measurements however somewhere else. The bridge number is 090/026A.
 

Attachments

  • image_2025-10-26_183930184.png
    image_2025-10-26_183930184.png
    694.4 KB · Views: 46

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,585
Location
Northampton
Thanks for the rough calculation, definitely gives us more confidence that it won't need to be modified in the future.
I've gotten a better photo here just in case, though the camera is a bit warped through barrel distortion. I'll try and look for other official measurements however somewhere else. The bridge number is 090/026A.
You can also get a solid estimate from the temporary fence panels alongside, which are generally 2m tall I think.

From the pictures the underside clearance is absolutely fine, but the parapets may not be the 1.8m required.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,514
Location
Lichfield
About 5 years ago, Scotland published documents saying eventually (2035/2040) the plan was to electrify the whole thing. Imho they are taking the sensible approach of doing it bit by bit. Good to see whatever happens.

That kind of answers a question I was about to ask, I've not really been keeping up with this one, but will electrification as far as Dalmeny actually be of benefit until the whole circle is wired?
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
4,374
Location
belfast
That kind of answers a question I was about to ask, I've not really been keeping up with this one, but will electrification as far as Dalmeny actually be of benefit until the whole circle is wired?
Yes it will be of benefit from the start, though benefits will increase over time.

From the day it is finished and in use, LNER will use it.
When ScotRail's BEMU order arrives, the fife services will also use it
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,514
Location
Lichfield
Yes it will be of benefit from the start, though benefits will increase over time.

From the day it is finished and in use, LNER will use it.
When ScotRail's BEMU order arrives, the fife services will also use it

How frequent are the LNER services though?
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
4,374
Location
belfast
So really, until the Scotrail bi-modes arrive, or the full Fife circle is wired, the benefits are going to be minimal.
Maybe so, but the Scotrail BEMUs (not Bi-modes, as there won't be diesel engines) literally can't enter service until a certain amount of electrification is delivered, across this project and a few others in Scotland. And fully electrifying the fife circle necessarily requires some parts of it to be electrified first (it is obviously not all going to be ready at the same time). For the second option, you would also have to wait for Scotrail to get more EMUs, as they are already short.

This has come up before, both around the projects involving Barrhead and East Kilbride, and around Fife. What I really don't get is why people get so upset about certain new infrastructure not being fully used from day one. It's kind of unavoidable? There will be trains useing it from day one, and the number of trains that use it will increase over time. That is a good outcome, so what are people unhappy about?
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,510
Location
Preston Lancs
@Trainbike46 - you have just stated/asked my frustration in one. Electrification would not get done if we had to have everything using it from day 1. I don’t want to drift OT but the North West England schemes were done bit by bit too.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,429
Location
Somerset
Maybe so, but the Scotrail BEMUs (not Bi-modes, as there won't be diesel engines) literally can't enter service until a certain amount of electrification is delivered, across this project and a few others in Scotland. And fully electrifying the fife circle necessarily requires some parts of it to be electrified first (it is obviously not all going to be ready at the same time). For the second option, you would also have to wait for Scotrail to get more EMUs, as they are already short.

This has come up before, both around the projects involving Barrhead and East Kilbride, and around Fife. What I really don't get is why people get so upset about certain new infrastructure not being fully used from day one. It's kind of unavoidable? There will be trains useing it from day one, and the number of trains that use it will increase over time. That is a good outcome, so what are people unhappy about?
If the electrification were to be intensively used from day one that would mean fleets of emus Lying around virtually unused until launch day. What a field day the press would have then!
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,110
We've had this debate quite recently. It takes time to electrify a network of lines, and so inevitably some bits will be ready before others. So it's very common for sections to be completed a couple of years before they can be utilised. In this case, the section, together with the sections on the main line as far as Ladybank, will be able to be used by the 5 LNER trains as soon as they are ready.
 

Top