matchmaker
Established Member
No Tunnocks Caramel Wafer, then?I guess we'll be waiting for a very, very long time if we'd like Loganair style customer service from the railway, sadly.
No Tunnocks Caramel Wafer, then?I guess we'll be waiting for a very, very long time if we'd like Loganair style customer service from the railway, sadly.
Five minutes is totally within the reasonable time to count as "when asked".
What if your stop was less than 5 minutes away?
Well they'll be leaving you then, won't they?What if your stop was less than 5 minutes away?
You wouldn't believe how many passengers think that the words "I'm just getting off here" somehow exempt them from the need to purchase a ticket.Well they'll be leaving you then, won't they?
This is why, of course, revenue staff are always needed. Many such dodgy people are well aware that the guard isn't going to leave the train with them. The better thing by far is to keep them out in the first place.You wouldn't believe how many passengers think that the words "I'm just getting off here" somehow exempt them from the need to purchase a ticket.
I imagine it's very common. But what is a guard going to do? They are now gone, and no longer your problem.You wouldn't believe how many passengers think that the words "I'm just getting off here" somehow exempt them from the need to purchase a ticket.
I imagine it's very common. But what is a guard going to do? They are now gone, and no longer your problem.
Oh I've a number of tricks up my sleeve. Particularly where there's the odd minute of slack in the schedule. Starting to inspect while waiting time at a station is a favourite of mine:I imagine it's very common. But what is a guard going to do? They are now gone, and no longer your problem.
Generally speaking, what gives companies / organisations the advantage in these situations is that they know that the vast majority of people are not legally trained or aware of the countless specifics of law. For instance, if a RPI goes straight for a penalty fare without considering the circumstances, there's a strong argument for refusing to accept the penalty fare, as it will force the RPI to write down the exact version of events. If the RPI refuses to write down the events exactly as they happened, then they're already in a legal quagmire that they might not be able to get themselves out of easily.
This doesn’t mean what you appear to think it means so trotting it out in this way isn’t much use to anyone.De minimis non curat lex.
No, it’s a standalone statutory obligation which does not depend on any agreement or acceptance by the passenger.Can a passenger "refuse" to accept a Penalty Fare?
You can refuse to provide details though that's opening up to a criminal prosecution under RoRA as you do have a legal duty to provide name and address when asked. Though whether the BTP would attend to deal with someone is an open question. This is one of those sorts of scenarios where the real scoundrels who are totally non-cooperative get away with things that the more obliging people don't.Can a passenger "refuse" to accept a Penalty Fare? After all that is exactly what the OP thought they were doing in another very similar recent case.
This doesn’t mean what you appear to think it means so trotting it out in this way isn’t much use to anyone.
The app would have no way of knowing if it was connected to the internet while not open.
As far as I know the railcard app doesn't do anything in the background.
Once you open the railcard it's there for 72 hours.