Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Havent seen 010 in service for ages not sure about 012. But they could be long term out of service as ive noticed some days 6 of the Cambrian units in service.
I'd like to know why as much as you would, but I was responding to @Krokodil's question "have they done much service?" with the 2022 and 2023 entry-to-service dates I found for those two units, suggesting that yes, they likely have done much service in terms of 197s Apologies for any confusion.
I'd like to know why as much as you would, but I was responding to @Krokodil's question "have they done much service?" with the 2022 and 2023 entry-to-service dates I found for those two units, suggesting that yes, they likely have done much service in terms of 197s Apologies for any confusion.
Many thanks for that @Gordonman May I ask how you know though, given that you're based in West Yorkshire (if your "location" of Baildon is correct)? Have you just been to Holyhead to see the 197s in the sidings, or have you found out another way?
I was wondering how much time in traffic they'd had compared to their peers, the answer to which would be found in the question "how long ago did they last turn a wheel in passenger service before being laid up?"
I was wondering how much time in traffic they'd had compared to their peers, the answer to which would be found in the question "how long ago did they last turn a wheel in passenger service before being laid up?"
I would like to know why all those ‘spare’ 197’s are parked in sidings at Holyhead whilst 2 car trains rammed with passengers are running around the network? Some days, we even have 2 car 150’s on the Cheltenham run.
I also note that the 67’s with Mk4 coaches are still not delivering reliable service. Why don’t they have the ‘spare’ 197’s distributed around the network so that a 5 car Mk4 set can be replaced with a 5 car 197 should the need arise? (The replacement seems to be a 2 car 197 at present).
If they had got a move on with getting Machynlleth over to 197’s, they could have sent the now spare 158’s around the network as back ups. Surely, Cardiff Canton does know how to maintain 158’s and these could have been used on Maesteg to Ebbw Vale as 3 car units as well as the Cheltenham run. That would have freed up 197’s for the long distance runs up The Marches as 5 car trains.
Of course, much of the current problems lie with the fact that the 398’s are just sitting in the Taff's Well depot. They have not even started to run Pontypridd to Cardiff Bay.
If they had got a move on with getting Machynlleth over to 197’s, they could have sent the now spare 158’s around the network as back ups. Surely, Cardiff Canton does know how to maintain 158’s and these could have been used on Maesteg to Ebbw Vale as 3 car units as well as the Cheltenham run. That would have freed up 197’s for the long distance runs up The Marches as 5 car trains.
Of course, much of the current problems lie with the fact that the 398’s are just sitting in the Taff's Well depot. They have not even started to run Pontypridd to Cardiff Bay.
It's not just about which depots "know how" to maintain which units, it's about having the capacity and resource - physical facilities, time and manpower - to maintain those extra trains. So even if the Cambrian 197s were running from Machynlleth they wouldn't necessarily have anywhere with the capacity to maintain the 158s
I've noticed that with the units that have the "standard premium" area on formation diagrams this is showing as first class despite it now being permanently declassified due to the accessibility issues discussed in this thread and elsewhere. I wonder why this hasn't been fixed?
I've noticed that with the units that have the "standard premium" area on formation diagrams this is showing as first class despite it now being permanently declassified due to the accessibility issues discussed in this thread and elsewhere. I wonder why this hasn't been fixed?
Oh right. Have you contacted Transport for Wales Rail and/or Network Rail about this? I'm not sure how it's handled at stations managed by a different company than the operator of the train.
Oh right. Have you contacted Transport for Wales Rail and/or Network Rail about this? I'm not sure how it's handled at stations managed by a different company than the operator of the train.
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.