• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lothian Group discussion (Lothian City, Lothian Country Bus and East Coast Buses)

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,117
I dare say we will have to wait until next week for the full details, I'm starting to wonder if they 73 will do both Livingston Village and Armadale. Either way it sounds like were getting some improvements.
 

TheEastCoaster

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
1,649
I dare say we will have to wait until next week for the full details, I'm starting to wonder if they 73 will do both Livingston Village and Armadale. Either way it sounds like were getting some improvements.

Well hopefully it won't be late into next week, but I do agree so far it sounds like improvements, and to be fair if the X27/X28 to get lesser stops than it's not the end of the world I suppose, maybe the X18/X19 will follow suite in the Maybury area.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for Lothian Country, the 72 getting cut back to Winchburgh is not a deal breaker, worse case scenario anyone can transfer over to an X19 and carry on the journey, assuming the X19 will survive the next service change!

Wonder if the 70/71 will see some changes?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Armadale will gain a service to Livingston

This is probably the best news for West Lothian regulars
 
Last edited:

Lothianbus703

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2020
Messages
350
Location
Edinburgh
905 plus I presume 906 Have been given "harlequin" style Lothian destination screens - this is a nice nod to the past and it was nice to see someone take the time to implement this into their destination screens. I had to do some edits from a video I took of the front to minimise the flicker of the LED's
905 harlequin Lothian dest.png
 

stevenedin

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2021
Messages
1,797
Location
Edinburgh
905 plus I presume 906 Have been given "harlequin" style Lothian destination screens - this is a nice nod to the past and it was nice to see someone take the time to implement this into their destination screens. I had to do some edits from a video I took of the front to minimise the flicker of the LED's
View attachment 185914
Looks great. It would be nice if these 2 were preserved one day and put back into their harlequin livery with roller blinds as well.
 

Simon75

On Moderation
Joined
25 May 2016
Messages
1,515
905 plus I presume 906 Have been given "harlequin" style Lothian destination screens - this is a nice nod to the past and it was nice to see someone take the time to implement this into their destination screens. I had to do some edits from a video I took of the front to minimise the flicker of the LED's
View attachment 185914
As an outsider what is/was 'Harlequin ' style destination screens
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,663
Festival wrecking its usual havoc. been waiting in Gilmerton on a 3 for 20 minutes only for one to pass empty and one only part route to Cameron Toll. Petition to ban tourists using the bus in August!
 

VioletEclipse

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2018
Messages
1,010
Location
Dùn Èideann
905 plus I presume 906 Have been given "harlequin" style Lothian destination screens - this is a nice nod to the past and it was nice to see someone take the time to implement this into their destination screens. I had to do some edits from a video I took of the front to minimise the flicker of the LED's
View attachment 185914
This is lovely, and shows that someone took the time indeed. Would also love to see one of these preserved one day.

On a different topic, have the new luggage racks on 601-615 removed a pair of seats, and would that make them H49/33F rather than H49/35F? Haven't paid enough attention when actually onboard since they got the racks.
 
Last edited:

FlybeDash8Q400

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
3,010
Location
Edinburgh
It could be every 40 minutes Monday to Saturday daytime and hourly Sunday and evenings.
I think this is fairly likely. The Kirkliston section is just removed purely due to increase reliability. It should remain a 4 hour circuit, however with the 20 minutes or so gained back used to increase the running time on what’s left and also to increase the layover at each end.

I’m not sure how a terminus in Winchburgh might work. The M9 stopping point that the X19 uses is not really suitable at all as it’s not even a bus stop, but rather just a bit of road with enough space to stop at and for vehicles to go around the ‘parked’ bus.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,117
I have to get a paper and pencil out to work this out. I can't disagree what been said with the No72, I wonder if they will try for a one way loop around Winchburgh with a min layover?

The big question will be if the No73 is going to Armadale or will it be a brand new route? Either way It's going to be a VERY LONG slog to get the network but to being half decent.
 

LiviCrazy

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
381
I think this is fairly likely. The Kirkliston section is just removed purely due to increase reliability. It should remain a 4 hour circuit, however with the 20 minutes or so gained back used to increase the running time on what’s left and also to increase the layover at each end.

I’m not sure how a terminus in Winchburgh might work. The M9 stopping point that the X19 uses is not really suitable at all as it’s not even a bus stop, but rather just a bit of road with enough space to stop at and for vehicles to go around the ‘parked’ bus.
It could quite feasibly just terminate at The High Schools/Xcite Hub. A big turning circle and plenty of place to rest.
 

FlybeDash8Q400

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
3,010
Location
Edinburgh
It could quite feasibly just terminate at The High Schools/Xcite Hub. A big turning circle and plenty of place to rest.
It could, but I feel like that would result in it missing half of Winchburgh out though? Which half depends which way you sent it.

I’d suggest a small one way loop involving Shale Road, Main Street and back up Beatlie Road may be an option.
 

LiviCrazy

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
381
It could, but I feel like that would result in it missing half of Winchburgh out though? Which half depends which way you sent it.

I’d suggest a small one way loop involving Shale Road, Main Street and back up Beatlie Road may be an option.
Could turn left at Tally Ho, then turn right at Sainsbury’s and go past The Marina then left down to the Hub from there. That would cover most of Winchburgh and would be closer to a bus stop than Lothian Country give a lot of West Lothian.
 

computerSaysNo

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2018
Messages
1,668
How busy are the X27/X28 north of Livingston Centre? And how busy is the 72 west of Livi Centre? And how busy are the X27/X28 east of Livi Centre?

If Livi - Sighthill - Edinburgh needs an increase you could increase X27 to every half an hour on the current route. X28 Armadale - Whitburn - Seafield - Livi Village - Livi Centre - Kirknewton - Edinburgh every hour would give Armadale their direct link to Livi and give Blackburn and Seafield a direct Edinburgh service again. X74 Whitburn - Fauldhouse - West Calder - Livi - Kirknewton - Edinburgh every hour, which would also give those towns a direct link again. 72 increase to every 30 minutes if needed but cut back to Eliburn. Drawbacks would be Livi - Craigshill - Bathgate goes down to every 30 minutes and loses its direct bus to Kirknewton. But Livi - Edinburgh increases slightly and the A71 and A705 corridors get back a direct Edinburgh service.

Alternatively you could scrap the 72 east of Livi and extend every second X19 over its current route to Livi - so Kirkliston keeps its direct Livi service, Kirkliston to Winchburgh is more efficient in reduced number of buses but no destinations lost, remaining 72 is much shorter so less delays. If people from Haymarket - Corstorphine - Ratho Station are happy sitting on a slow bus then they've got their direct service to Livi back again as well.
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,138
Location
Elginshire
As an outsider what is/was 'Harlequin ' style destination screens
It refers to the pattern used on the "Harlequin" livery that was used for low-floor buses when they were first introduced. The livery was then phased out in favour of madder and white again once the whole fleet was low-floor.

See this image of Volvo B7TL/Wright Gemini:
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
9,117
Alternatively you could scrap the 72 east of Livi and extend every second X19 over its current route to Livi - so Kirkliston keeps its direct Livi service, Kirkliston to Winchburgh is more efficient in reduced number of buses but no destinations lost, remaining 72 is much shorter so less delays. If people from Haymarket - Corstorphine - Ratho Station are happy sitting on a slow bus then they've got their direct service to Livi back again as well.

Kirkliston already has a direct service to Livingston with Stagecoach X51 which is also a lot faster. I dare say the passengers voted with their feet for the more direct service.
 

mb88

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2012
Messages
525
How busy are the X27/X28 north of Livingston Centre? And how busy is the 72 west of Livi Centre? And how busy are the X27/X28 east of Livi Centre?

If Livi - Sighthill - Edinburgh needs an increase you could increase X27 to every half an hour on the current route. X28 Armadale - Whitburn - Seafield - Livi Village - Livi Centre - Kirknewton - Edinburgh every hour would give Armadale their direct link to Livi and give Blackburn and Seafield a direct Edinburgh service again. X74 Whitburn - Fauldhouse - West Calder - Livi - Kirknewton - Edinburgh every hour, which would also give those towns a direct link again. 72 increase to every 30 minutes if needed but cut back to Eliburn. Drawbacks would be Livi - Craigshill - Bathgate goes down to every 30 minutes and loses its direct bus to Kirknewton. But Livi - Edinburgh increases slightly and the A71 and A705 corridors get back a direct Edinburgh service.

Alternatively you could scrap the 72 east of Livi and extend every second X19 over its current route to Livi - so Kirkliston keeps its direct Livi service, Kirkliston to Winchburgh is more efficient in reduced number of buses but no destinations lost, remaining 72 is much shorter so less delays. If people from Haymarket - Corstorphine - Ratho Station are happy sitting on a slow bus then they've got their direct service to Livi back again as well.
There’s no way you can cut the Bathgate - Livingston via Craigshill section to half hourly, it’s far too busy. I’d even go as far as to say that, outside of the peaks, it’s busier than the Livingston to Edinburgh section.
 

stevenedin

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2021
Messages
1,797
Location
Edinburgh
There’s no way you can cut the Bathgate - Livingston via Craigshill section to half hourly, it’s far too busy. I’d even go as far as to say that, outside of the peaks, it’s busier than the Livingston to Edinburgh section.
I agree. They should leave the X27 and X28 as they are as they work. Any tinkering with them will only put off more passengers.
 

Top