noddingdonkey
Member
- Joined
- 2 Nov 2012
- Messages
- 922
Presumably this is going to affect units required at Neville Hill for maintenance tonight?
I’m not huge fan of Northern and some of their decisions, but on this one I really don’t know what else they could have done!
Monday should be fine. Tomorrow may have alterations as they rebalance the fleet to the correct locations.I’ve managed to catch a train into Leeds from Sandal & Agbrigg, and we’ve passed Wakefield Westgate so there’s no going back now
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Presumably with it being Sunday tomorrow, there could be residual disruption from this continuing into Monday?
What did you end up doing? The 1944 TPE service starting from Newcastle does seem to have run, albeit some 15-20 mins down.I'm supposed to be on the 1944 Newcastle to Manchester. At the moment TPE are saying it's running, but I'm sceptical.
A civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.What do you suggest they do, when the whole of West Yorkshire (and beyond) is crippled?
Reduce bus services and disrupt even more people!?A civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.
Scummy bus passengers obviously being a lower priority than nice train travellers of courseA civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.
I believe Mirfield area was equally shafted (certainly there was a passenger train stuck in the Leeds bound platform and a freight behind it)I'm guessing the route between York and Brighouse via Wakefield Kirkgate and Heaton Lodge Jn (avoiding Leeds) wasn't available as an alternative to keep those that didn't want Leeds area destinations moving?
But if I was a bus driver why would I come off my diagram anymore than I would as a train driver if it didn’t suit me?A civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.
The section of line between Ulleskelf and Church Fenton is controlled by Leeds East workstation which was one of the five impacted.I'm guessing the route between York and Brighouse via Wakefield Kirkgate and Heaton Lodge Jn (avoiding Leeds) wasn't available as an alternative to keep those that didn't want Leeds area destinations moving?
It’s CSL2 Black, encouraging those who don’t need to travel not to travel is very sensible.All very well to say "do not travel", but at that time of day that's a bit late - most people will be trying to get home. I cuold so easily have been among them as I would have been at Ribblehead when it all went wrong, and would have been stranded at Leeds overnight. At least it's a mild one.
So local bus users should suffer? Incredibly selfish.A civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.
it’s okay, it’s never going to happen.So local bus users should suffer? Incredibly selfish.
Does that workstation cover as far as Colton Jn?The section of line between Ulleskelf and Church Fenton is controlled by Leeds East workstation which was one of the five impacted.
Not selfish - it is sharing resources. Instead of a bus every ten minutes you get one every 20 minutes. Just a minor irritation in what is a major crisis. Everyone needs to pull together when there is emergency and did when a major incident was declared here due weatherIt’s CSL2 Black, encouraging those who don’t need to travel not to travel is very sensible.
So local bus users should suffer? Incredibly selfish.
What I'd expect would be some formal agreement in place between rail operators and local bus companies in the event of a signalling meltdown or other serious issue, passengers would be able to use their rail ticket on the local bus service(s), to get them to their destination. Not ideal, but it does keep things moving. E.g someone stranded at Hebden Bridge would be permitted to use First Halifax services 590/591/592 to Halifax, then Arriva Yorkshire service 255 to Leeds.What do you expect the Train companies to do.
So you are suggesting a local bus driver stops doing a short route from the city centre to an outer suburb and suddenly becomes a rail replacement, running long distance, with no route learning and probably not enough driving hours?Not selfish - it is sharing resources. Instead of a bus every ten minutes you get one every 20 minutes. Just a minor irritation in what is a major crisis. Everyone needs to pull together when there is emergency and did when a major incident was declared here due weather
You've clearly never used a bus service in West Yorkshire. Lucky if we get a normal bus service of one every half hour!Not selfish - it is sharing resources. Instead of a bus every ten minutes you get one every 20 minutes. Just a minor irritation in what is a major crisis. Everyone needs to pull together when there is emergency and did when a major incident was declared here due weather
When I first read your post I was in admiration of it thinking it was a well crafted tongue in cheek parody of an over the top response post.A civil emergency should be declared when there is an incident as major as this - emergency centres should be opened for people to stay. Bus services should be reduced to make drivers and vehicles available.
Yup. Every workstation I believe, and multiple points out of correspondenceNRES refer to a signalling fault. Something this large would suggest a complete loss of signalling in a panel(s)
It doesn't. Hence the main ECML was still able to run, platform congestion at York and Doncaster aside.Does that workstation cover as far as Colton Jn?
Again, it's supply and demand of taxis, in the same way as supply and demand of buses. You will never generally have this much contingency in a system to account for the very rare, very significant failures. See also: Heathrow etc etc.We had to fight tooth and nail (my mother is diabetic and was at the point of nearly passing out) to be given a taxi back home, along with another stranded passenger.
Chaotic is an understatement. There were still 50+ people stuck when we got our taxi.
Presumably this is going to affect units required at Neville Hill for maintenance tonight?
Like the kind of day you need a glass of wine after!Actually, If I was signaller, what would my day look like after a total loss of signalling?
It can indeedchaotic today! Does anyone know the score with a priv ticket and having to get a taxi? Can it still be claimed from the TOC as a customer would?
Sounds like a loss of all Comms links into the ROC. Points showing OOC would be the result of loss of detection information from the interlockings I suspect.Yup. Every workstation I believe, and multiple points out of correspondence
More or less. The priority is to get trains into platforms (even if only partially) if possible then go from there.If the signalling has failed how does authorising trains to move work? Is the general principle that passenger trains go to the next suitable platform only and then terminate?