I'm fairly sure there are not, but some 156s will still be freed up. Aside from the West Highland Line, there isn't anywhere else for them to go.I don’t think it’s yet been established if there are sufficient spare EMUs to run a full electric service. Happy to be corrected though.
The other G&SW services no?I'm fairly sure there are not, but some 156s will still be freed up. Aside from the West Highland Line, there isn't anywhere else for them to go.
Many services off-peak that were single units during that period are now double though.There should be enough emus. After all the services to Ayrshire have never been restored to previous levels.
Many services off-peak that were single units during that period are now double though.
There's also one unit on Barrheads and additionally technically nothing replacing the 314s withdrawn in 2019 - it was just rejigging unit diagrams to use the remaining EMU fleet, some 318/320 workings were reduced to single units to account for the 314s being withdrawn.
There are 385s in Inverclyde, which I don't think was part of the original intentions - presumably replacing the former 314 diagrams there.Was there not "surplus" 385s after the original EGIP was cut back? I guess they've been redeployed already though.
Thanks, I couldn't remember where they ended up.There are 385s in Inverclyde, which I don't think was part of the original intentions - presumably replacing the former 314 diagrams there.
The peak time EGIP service is more or less as originally planned, so there might not be many surplus units?Was there not "surplus" 385s after the original EGIP was cut back? I guess they've been redeployed already though.
I knew I'd forgotten another route. Looks like there are a few two cars through Kilmarnock currently.The other G&SW services no?
Correct. From December timetable change it's one diagram all day that goes electric, from my hazy memory if it's currently a 6 car formation it'll still be a 156 from December.I don’t think it’s yet been established if there are sufficient spare EMUs to run a full electric service. Happy to be corrected though.
Wow, all that money and disruption for one EMU diagram? Is there a plan in the pipeline to add more? New trains are several years away at best.Correct. From December timetable change it's one diagram all day that goes electric, from my hazy memory if it's currently a 6 car formation it'll still be a 156 from December.
Seems totally pointless, doesn’t it. I can’t believe a business case was built around one train per hour. Other efficiencies such as one man operation have also been dropped. Yet another transport project out of control.Wow, all that money and disruption for one EMU diagram? Is there a plan in the pipeline to add more? New trains are several years away at best.
318/320s to replace 380s on Cathcart/Newton/Neilston to in turn replace 156s on EK?Should be enough capacity at the weekend. Should be able to move a few sets from Yoker on Friday evening to Shields, then send them back on Monday before peak
Good point, forgot Inverclyde. Paisley Canal has some 380s as well IIRC, another possibility?That was my thoughts or a couple of Inverclyde runs.
This all sounds like a lot of hassle. How many spare class 318 and 320 are at Yoker at weekends? The service is very similar to weekdays now. I know this has been discussed before but it's mind blowing that they would electrify a line and then not have electric units to work it. Especially with lots of class 321s having just gone for scrap (which could have been converted) and class 350/2s off lease.Should be enough capacity at the weekend. Should be able to move a few sets from Yoker on Friday evening to Shields, then send them back on Monday before peak
I know this has been discussed before but it's mind blowing that they would electrify a line and then not have electric units to work it.
Should be enough capacity at the weekend. Should be able to move a few sets from Yoker on Friday evening to Shields, then send them back on Monday before peak
I have to agree, especially when Scotrail did so well to get the Class 365 sets up here and into service when the 385 fleet was delayed. Things seem to have gone very much backward since then!
A temporary fleet is an absolute non starter.
I don't think the majority of users will notice to be perfectly honest, as unless 380 or 385 are sent over they'd still be stepping onto trains that are between 35 and 39 years vintage. The soundtrack and door position would be the only tells.The additional units, as mentioned earlier, should be of a type already used in Scotland, ie 321 reduced to 3 cars; As has already happened. People will surely be rather disappointed that after weeks of a complete line closure, and other disruption, just one diagram actually goes over to EMUs!
At what point in the project was it realised that there wouldn't be enough electric trains? Seems like a pretty serious error to me. I doubt anyone would have agreed to all the cost and disruption for a one in three chance of getting a different train. As I mentioned above, the obvious medium term solution would have been more 320s converted from 321s. Space would be freed up for them by sending 156s elsewhere.This is not feasible in the slightest. No space nor any paths to do this on repeat every weekend. Nor the drivers either.
Until ScotRail get their new EMU/BEMU order then it’ll be one electric diagram per day.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
But there was a complete shortage of trains then, and it was actually a pretty desperate move to bring in the class 365s (not to mention they were awful and had no business being near such a route).
There are enough class 156 units to continue covering the East Kilbride service. There would be no space for a fleet drafted in purely for this route, plus the cost of training traincrews and depot maintenance staff would not be worth it. A temporary fleet is an absolute non starter.
Probably a different project to provide the trains and a similar situation to the project to build the ferries v the project to upgrade Ardrossan. Someone at Transport Scotland should be managing project interdependencies. Perhaps they are and political decisions are being taken to contain costs without realising the implications? We don’t know but the various transport correspondents are beginning to pick up on it.At what point in the project was it realised that there wouldn't be enough electric trains? Seems like a pretty serious error to me. I doubt anyone would have agreed to all the cost and disruption for a one min three chance of getting a different train. As I mentioned above, the obvious medium term solution would have been more 320s converted from 321s. Space would be freed up for them by sending 156s elsewhere.
Presumably before the first spade hit the ground. I’m guessing the funding was no longer there to electrify and have new trains at the same time, which presumably was the original intent. When the funding was no longer sufficient to do both then a decision was made to keep rolling electrification across the country to keep costs down.At what point in the project was it realised that there wouldn't be enough electric trains? Seems like a pretty serious error to me. I doubt anyone would have agreed to all the cost and disruption for a one min three chance of getting a different train. As I mentioned above, the obvious medium term solution would have been more 320s converted from 321s. Space would be freed up for them by sending 156s elsewhere.