• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The end of the Royal Train

Status
Not open for further replies.

godfreycomplex

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2016
Messages
1,759
Tweet from Angus Duncan that sums it up

“I’m a republican, but I’m still conflicted over the royal train being withdrawn. It sends a message that the rich and the famous, the elites if you want, are above rail travel. A royal train, made it clear that nobody was too good for catching the train.”

Also very sorry for the hard working folk on the ground at DB Cargo who just don’t seem to be able to catch a break at the moment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,488
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
It's a fair point, although I suppose that is one of the reasons why HS2 was/is being built.
Yes, but it's not otherwise at 99.99999999999% capacity!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Is that still the case? Given the short attention span of the public in general, I would expect the fascination with this particular loco to have worn off now!
No, its still rampant. The media also stlll almost invariably call the loco 'The Flying Scotsman' too!
 

DDB

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2011
Messages
728
Leaving everything else aside, if the railway can't accommodate an occasional special (like the Royal Train) then it is not fit for pupurpose.
What do we think the railway is for? Having spare capacity everywhere in case once a year there might be a royal train or other special is a waste of either money or capacity.
The railway is for moving as many people or as much stuff as possible.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
Tweet from Angus Duncan that sums it up

“I’m a republican, but I’m still conflicted over the royal train being withdrawn. It sends a message that the rich and the famous, the elites if you want, are above rail travel. A royal train, made it clear that nobody was too good for catching the train.”
I disagree. By that logic, the United Kingdom painted A321neo means no one is too good to catch an easyJet A321neo.

The late Queen catching the Great Northern service to Kings Lynn is a better example of royals taking ordinary transport.
 

athro

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2022
Messages
16
Location
S. Wales
Really sad news.
Why?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Tweet from Angus Duncan that sums it up

“I’m a republican, but I’m still conflicted over the royal train being withdrawn. It sends a message that the rich and the famous, the elites if you want, are above rail travel. A royal train, made it clear that nobody was too good for catching the train.”

Also very sorry for the hard working folk on the ground at DB Cargo who just don’t seem to be able to catch a break at the moment
How silly!
Unless he offers you a knighthood?
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,608
Location
Wales
No, not true for bridges etc.
Didn't it used to be a thing? Along with a pilot loco running ahead (still the practice in some other countries).

Tweet from Angus Duncan that sums it up

“I’m a republican, but I’m still conflicted over the royal train being withdrawn. It sends a message that the rich and the famous, the elites if you want, are above rail travel. A royal train, made it clear that nobody was too good for catching the train.”
A private train isn't exactly comparable to scheduled services (which I'm sure that the royals will continue to use). If anything a private train suggests that they are averse to mixing with the masses, though at least the trips to Kings Lynn dispel that.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,879
Also very sorry for the hard working folk on the ground at DB Cargo who just don’t seem to be able to catch a break at the moment
It was two trains a year last year, let's not get over dramatic about the impact on DB Cargo.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
Didn't it used to be a thing? Along with a pilot loco running ahead (still the practice in some other countries).


A private train isn't exactly comparable to scheduled services (which I'm sure that the royals will continue to use). If anything a private train suggests that they are averse to mixing with the masses, though at least the trips to Kings Lynn dispel that.
I’ve witnessed the royal train for many many years, never once seen police on a bridge.
Also never seen a loco ahead or behind the Royal Train (not saying it’s doesn’t happen).
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,227
Understandable if it's been barely used over the last couple of years, though it was quite intensively being used at one point, and as a casual observer it seems William & Catherine seemed to use it quite a lot before her illness, I wonder how much that and her partaking in fewer Royal duties as a result have impacted the usage?

As for planning it, it's mostly planned as per a regular charter train, it used to be a dedicated person in the charters team who planned it, but I don't know about recently. It even has it's own delay manager code, which I happened to have to use not too long ago, won't be used that much more for the 'special train', though I think it can still be used for military trains running under similar 'ghost schedule' restrictions.
In my days with RES/EWS it certainly wasn't planned "as per a regular charter train". As a sort of Team Leader on charters I was the lowest form of life allowed anywhere near it, and then only if three other people were absent (and I had to have security clearance - which I passed!).

It took a lot of resource, however you look at it, but difficult to specify a cost since it usually meant people were diverted from doing other things.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,912
Am I correct in saying that wherever the Royal Train travelled, stations it passed through and bridges it passed under/over, were manned by police?
I lived next to the Leamside line a long time ago. Just before it closed, the royal train used it. We had noticed a police car at the farm crossing behind our house the day before. Then about half an hour before the light engine preceding the train came through a couple of plain clothes guys in an unmarked car were sniffing around the crossing.

Honestly those running costs can't include all the kerfuffle and faff of security checking every crossing or potential access point before the train comes through.

It's sad in a way. But the royal trains came into being because in those days rail travel was the fastest and most convenient option for the royal family. That is no longer the case.

My views on royalty evolve. I think on balance I'm a republican now and I don't think the royal family are at all relevant or needed in a modern society. They are just landed gentry with benefits.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Also never seen a loco ahead or behind the Royal Train (not saying it’s doesn’t happen).
It 100% happened when I witnessed it behind my house in the early 1990s. Can't speak for more recent times.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
I lived next to the Leamside line a long time ago. Just before it closed, the royal train used it. We had noticed a police car at the farm crossing behind our house the day before. Then about half an hour before the light engine preceding the train came through a couple of plain clothes guys in an unmarked car were sniffing around the crossing.

Honestly those running costs can't include all the kerfuffle and faff of security checking every crossing or potential access point before the train comes through.

It's sad in a way. But the royal trains came into being because in those days rail travel was the fastest and most convenient option for the royal family. That is no longer the case.

My views on royalty evolve. I think on balance I'm a republican now and I don't think the royal family are at all relevant or needed in a modern society. They are just landed gentry with benefits.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


It 100% happened when I witnessed it behind my house in the early 1990s. Can't speak for more recent times.
So nearly 40 years ago!
Certainly not like that now.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,608
Location
Wales
I’ve witnessed the royal train for many many years, never once seen police on a bridge.
Also never seen a loco ahead or behind the Royal Train (not saying it’s doesn’t happen).
How many years are we talking? Because I'm pretty certain that it was a thing in steam days. No idea when exactly either practice ceased.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,651
Location
Hampshire
How many years are we talking? Because I'm pretty certain that it was a thing in steam days. No idea when exactly either practice ceased.
It certainly wasn’t a practice in use when I was involved in clearing stations in the last decade ahead of it, so with a more intensive railway it must have stopped in the 2000s.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,608
Location
Wales
It certainly wasn’t a practice in use when I was involved in clearing stations in the last decade ahead of it, so with a more intensive railway it must have stopped in the 2000s.
I've a feeling that it would have been an economy made by BR
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,702
Location
Hope Valley
Certainly no ‘pilot’ move or police on bridges when I first oversaw a Royal Train move from a signal box in 1979.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,041
Location
Up the creek
As far as I can remember we would have one of the management come to the box a few hours before the Royal’s passing, hand us an individually numbered Special Notice with its times and any other details. We would sign for the notice and, I think, record it in the Train Register: ‘Special Train Notice 456/7, number 123, received 20.45’, or similar. After the train had passed it would, possibly the following day, be collected and, I think, signed as so, though possibly not in the Train Register.

I never saw a policeman, but I think that the county constabulary were informed of the train passing through. I suspect that BTP just had someone on the platform at the main stations that it had offices at.
 

danielnez1

Member
Joined
14 May 2012
Messages
311
Location
Seghill
It certainly wasn’t a practice in use when I was involved in clearing stations in the last decade ahead of it, so with a more intensive railway it must have stopped in the 2000s.
I wonder if that may be a side effect of post 9/11 heightened security making it less necessary?
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,912
Certainly no ‘pilot’ move or police on bridges when I first oversaw a Royal Train move from a signal box in 1979.

I wonder if that may be a side effect of post 9/11 heightened security making it less necessary?
Perhaps a risk-based approach. As I said, I certainly witnessed both the farm crossing being inspected the day before and about an hour before, and the the pilot loco ahead of the actual train.
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,056
Location
UK
Lots of uncosted plans to (a) keep an eye on security especially on station platforms and of course stand-by arrangements as required for staff , including train fitters etc "just in case" . (when I was at Watford as Ops Manager , I had rolling stock fitters "handy" at Euston , Watford , MK and Northampton - and that was just for a journey to Long Buckby.
What was the unlikely situation the fitters were there for?
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,846
In my days with RES/EWS it certainly wasn't planned "as per a regular charter train". As a sort of Team Leader on charters I was the lowest form of life allowed anywhere near it, and then only if three other people were absent (and I had to have security clearance - which I passed!).

It took a lot of resource, however you look at it, but difficult to specify a cost since it usually meant people were diverted from doing other things.

I'm coming at it from a Network Rail perspective, I'm sure from the operator side it's different kettle of fish.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,337
Location
Herts
What was the unlikely situation the fitters were there for?
Obviously any kind of rolling stock issue that may arise , and cause potential disruption. My brother in law , for example was a Bescot based M&EE fitter , so he and his boss (the Area Maintenance Engineer) would take the depot van - carrying a wide range of tools and spares - and stand awaiting the call (it never came) - at say Nuneaton if a Royal was passing through the Trent Valley.

This was in BR days.
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,683
Location
Solihull
A shame (for historical reasons), i did hope to see it one day, best i've managed is seeing one of the 67s operating light engine at Derby once!
 

52290

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2015
Messages
731
I saw a narrow gauge Royal train on the Welsh Highland Railway on 30/7/2003 marking the extension of the line from Waunfauwr to Rhyd Ddu and conveying Prince Charles to the opening ceremony. The train was hauled by FR No2 Prince and Prince Charles rode on the footplate for some of the journey, which was probably a first.The Royal coach was North Wales Narrow Gauge Railways replica no. 24.
The security seemed quite informal and I got quite close to the Prince, both man and loco, at Rhyd Ddu.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,417
Location
The Fens
I'm sure a ex works SF 47 broke down somewhere in Anglia and had to be replaced with a filthy 47572,I'm sure moving is better than cleanliness anyway
In 1986 47457 failed at Bishops Stortford when hauling the up Fenman with HM the Queen in an extra FK on the rear of the train. A Liverpool Street-Cambridge service was terminated at Bishops Stortford to provide the rescue loco which was 47577.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,651
Location
Hampshire
it is nowhere near as luxurious as a charter train - It is more 1980's travel lodge ( from looking through the window at MKC!)
No, you’re right. It is very dated inside and potentially one of the reasons why it is being retired as the cost to bring it up to modern standards would be considerable.

(And why it wouldn’t be practical as an alternative to the Britannic as I’ve seen suggested elsewhere!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top