Probably issues with keeping units at picadilly at the minute because of 2 platforms being blocked by the roof works and this past few weeks they had another one being blocked to electric traction .Hi
Yesterday a Northern service from Piccadilly to Stoke and the return were cancelled due to a staffing issue. The train ran as an ECS to Stoke and return. I was wondering why did the train run instead of it just staying at Piccadilly.
Thanks
Could it also be that it’s the driver’s only route retention run….There’s a few reasons potentially.
A) Platform capacity - might not be possible to keep the service there blocking platforms for well over an hour. There may be no available sidings / depot nearby either.
B) The missing staff (presuming a guard) might be able to sourced at destination to start the service from there.
Or that the driver is relieved for their break/end of shift at the far end.Could it also be that it’s the driver’s only route retention run….
Train needs to vacate platform to allow another service to use platform.Hi
Yesterday a Northern service from Piccadilly to Stoke and the return were cancelled due to a staffing issue. The train ran as an ECS to Stoke and return. I was wondering why did the train run instead of it just staying at Piccadilly.
Thanks
Is there actually a crew depot at Stoke for this to be a viable option?This does seem a bit stranger than normal, with it running back ECS with the same driver. All i can guess is that Northern hoped to resource a guard at Stoke but weren't able to, and the platform at Picc was needed.
Almost certainly platform space at Picc, Stoke is 100% Picc work at NorthernIs there actually a crew depot at Stoke for this to be a viable option?
I suppose it could have been spun at Macclesfield but probably by the time the planners have faffed around with changing the schedule/checking for conflicts, it is "cheaper" to just send it on its booked working
I would wager platform space at Picc being the reason for the service running ECS as it did
Almost certainly platform space at Picc, Stoke is 100% Picc work at Northern
Normally it's probably awkward but achievable.Platform space for the train to be held there for its normal turnaround time + journey to stoke + back? Doubtful without multiple platform alterations and congestion.
Similar with train run ECS to Sheffield.This does seem a bit stranger than normal, with it running back ECS with the same driver. All i can guess is that Northern hoped to resource a guard at Stoke but weren't able to, and the platform at Picc was needed.
Ahem. Perhaps the performance penalty for running a train with no guard ECS is 50%. Just a thought...
As in “almost certainly platform space at Picc (or lack thereof) was the reason for the move”Platform space for the train to be held there for its normal turnaround time + journey to stoke + back? Doubtful without multiple platform alterations and congestion.
Can't speak for the particular example which prompted the thread but it's an occasional feature for ScotRail to operate an ECS journey and cancel the passenger carrying journey booked for the same unit to the same destination in the immediate wake of its late-running inbound journey in order to get it back on diagram for subsequent journeys. As an alternative to "stop skipping" it appears to wind prospective passengers up marginally less and is less disruptive than running the set late for multiple subsequent journeys and losing paths and connections in consequence and winding up a much larger amount of passengers in the process.