• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Anyone noticed anecdotally another uptick in passenger numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,725
Location
West Riding
Sounds remarkably like N******n R**l to me.
They’re just genuinely incompetent, it’s an operator that specialises in crossing hilly areas at speed that seems to have an unofficial policy of declining everything in the hope it deters claims and saves money.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,413
Location
Yorks
They’re just genuinely incompetent, it’s an operator that specialises in crossing hilly areas at speed that seems to have an unofficial policy of declining everything in the hope it deters claims and saves money.

I wonder who that could be.

Perhaps I've been unlucky in that case !
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,413
Location
Yorks
To be fair, Northern does seem to pay out quite quickly unless it's something "off normal" like a rover/ranger/split ticketing. Still much slower than they take the money out of your account when you buy a ticket, of course.

I can only speak for myself, but I've put in two claims with them over the last year, and they've both been turned down on spurious grounds, so perhaps I'm cynical.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,213
Location
West Wiltshire
I have just done an analysis of the new ORR data published today (Jan-March), to see which is busiest, and excluding open access is Chiltern at 30 passenger km per vehicle km

Its in ORR data thread


Data also shows one operator is about 48% above year earlier
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,725
Location
West Riding
Can you provide specific examples please.
Highland Chieftain, Night Riviera, most Caledonian Sleeper services; this random XC service that has gone from 28L to probably an on time arrival:


This GC service:


This LNER London-Aberdeen:


That’s just a very quick sweep, but I think I could spend all day finding examples if I was that way inclined (I’m not ;) ).
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,920
Highland Chieftain, Night Riviera, most Caledonian Sleeper services; this random XC service that has gone from 28L to probably an on time arrival:


This GC service:


This LNER London-Aberdeen:


That’s just a very quick sweep, but I think I could spend all day finding examples if I was that way inclined (I’m not ;) ).

and how has this changed?

Theres not *that* much performance allowance in any of them, and none at all in the GC service (except the mandatory minute for all trains through the Welwyn 2 track section).
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,725
Location
West Riding
and how has this changed?

Theres not *that* much perfromance allowance in any of them, and none at all in the GC service (except the mandatory minute for all trains through the Welwyn 2 track section).
Do the station dwell times not seem a tad excessive to you?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,784
Location
UK
Can you provide specific examples please.
TfW are one of the worst offenders, e.g. 4 minutes on arrival at Manchester Piccadilly here. Their non-stop trains are sometimes shown as being overtaken by stoppers!

MTR aren't much better on the Elizabeth line; they add 2 minutes onto the arrival time at stations like Shenfield where they know they don't need to compete, but not for journeys where the advertised journey time has to be competitive to maximise revenue, such as arriving into Heathrow. Funny, that...
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,920
I’m not suggesting it doesnt happen, I was querying the assertion (not by you!) that operators were ‘wising up’ and ‘inserting generous amounts of revovery time to avoid paying out’, ie doing more of it.

As it happens I have the data on this on my screen right now. The amount of passenger differentials in the whole timetable has reduced, by more than 60%, over the past few years, ie TOCs have been doing quite the opposite and removing ‘padding’ in the timetable. Notably this is usually DfT funded TOCs; which helps to explain why Open Access, Elizabeth Line and TfW are some of the examples quoted above.

As an aside, the removal of this quantity of differentials has had a measurable affect on performance figures. Im not providing a view whether it is right or wrong, but it is one of the reasons that performance is worse than it was a few years ago.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,454
Location
Somerset
Do the station dwell times not seem a tad excessive to you?
In the days when various continental railways were praised for their timekeeping (why can’t we be like that?) 5 - 10 minute stops for long-distance services at major nodes were the norm. “Padding” can also be viewed as timetabling for resilience!
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,725
Location
West Riding
That’s about matching paths on busy parts of the network, not performance.
Officially perhaps, but it has the effect of extending journey times and getting delayed trains back on time conveniently towards the end of their journeys, so passengers are being slowed down; ‘pre-delayed,’ if you like, while TOC’s save money on delay repay payments.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,725
Location
West Riding
I’m not suggesting it doesnt happen, I was querying the assertion (not by you!) that operators were ‘wising up’ and ‘inserting generous amounts of revovery time to avoid paying out’, ie doing more of it.

As it happens I have the data on this on my screen right now. The amount of passenger differentials in the whole timetable has reduced, by more than 60%, over the past few years, ie TOCs have been doing quite the opposite and removing ‘padding’ in the timetable. Notably this is usually DfT funded TOCs; which helps to explain why Open Access, Elizabeth Line and TfW are some of the examples quoted above.

As an aside, the removal of this quantity of differentials has had a measurable affect on performance figures. Im not providing a view whether it is right or wrong, but it is one of the reasons that performance is worse than it was a few years ago.
Can you break it down by TOC? My gut feeling would be that TOC’s doing more frequent, shorter journeys have tightened up, whereas those doing infrequent long journeys have gone in the opposite direction, but are masked by the more frequent shorter journey stats.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Indeed. I have claimed Delay Repay for every Avanti journey I have made in the last 3 weeks...
In my football away trips last season it had occured to me that as I was getting 110% delay repay on nearly every E & WCML journey It might actually be worth transferring the journeys i was making by long distance coach on to rail. this would have only applied to the return journey as I wouldnt want to miss kick off!
 

Adrian1980uk

Member
Joined
24 May 2016
Messages
842
Can you break it down by TOC? My gut feeling would be that TOC’s doing more frequent, shorter journeys have tightened up, whereas those doing infrequent long journeys have gone in the opposite direction, but are masked by the more frequent shorter journey stats.
I think it's been tightened up due to the performance of new trains, but it's still there, just locally to me it appears to take longer to get from Diss to Norwich than Norwich to Diss.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,920
Can you break it down by TOC? My gut feeling would be that TOC’s doing more frequent, shorter journeys have tightened up, whereas those doing infrequent long journeys have gone in the opposite direction, but are masked by the more frequent shorter journey stats.

Yes.

Number of DfT funded TOCs that have increased passenger differentials: 0
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,454
Location
Somerset
I think it's been tightened up due to the performance of new trains, but it's still there, just locally to me it appears to take longer to get from Diss to Norwich than Norwich to Diss.
Almost inevitable when contrasting a departure from a major terminus and and arrival.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,772
Highland Chieftain, Night Riviera, most Caledonian Sleeper services; this random XC service that has gone from 28L to probably an on time arrival:
The XC services have always had some long dwells, they don't seem any different to what they were when I had the pleasure of using them in the past. Part of it is resilience but also they do crew changes and restock the buffet trolley etc, as well as pathing reasons. It's nothing new
 

Adrian1980uk

Member
Joined
24 May 2016
Messages
842
Yes.

Number of DfT funded TOCs that have increased passenger differentials: 0
Yes I think performance allowances have been backed into timetables for approximately 15 to 20 years now as I seem to remember in the early 2000s there was a bit of controversy over it.
 

Mike395

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
3,400
Location
Bedford
Anecdotally, I feel like leisure travel has taken another significant uptick recently. As just one example this 8 car EMR Connect service is full and standing (with 3&2 seating!) south of Luton, very rare even on peak summer weekends last year in my experience…
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
3,401
Every Wirral line train into Liverpool on a Saturday is rammed.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,920
Anecdotally, I feel like leisure travel has taken another significant uptick recently. As just one example this 8 car EMR Connect service is full and standing (with 3&2 seating!) south of Luton, very rare even on peak summer weekends last year in my experience…

Trooping the Colour today - a big draw of crowds.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,920
Just shows the necessity to have a high capacity railway in the UK, no other form of transport can move 5 or 6 hundred people into London at a time.

5-6 hundred thousand, and I’d agree with you.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top