• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

CrossCountry compulsory reservations: forcing passengers into 1st class

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,731
Location
Burgess Hill
CrossCountry seem to have started doing compulsory reservations on some services, but only between Birmingham New Street and Wolverhampton.

This appears to be part of an attempt to prevent walk-ups from Birmingham to Wolverhampton from being issued on these services if there are no seats remaining, and trying to force local journeys to be made on TfW/WMR/LNR.

You can see on Timetable History below:

  • Reservations available from Bournemouth to Birmingham New Street
  • Reservations compulsory from Birmingham New Street to Wolverhampton
  • Reservations available from Wolverhampton


If you try booking the 17:01 service today online, you'll be forced to pay double the price for a 1st class single as there's no more standard class reservations available.

Even better, the 19:01 is also affected. This is a 3x increase in cost over the West Mids PTA evening day return which is valid on that CrossCountry service for £2.80 compared to the inflated £8.40 1st single price.

20:01 and later are not affected, and will show the £2.80 ticket on the forum's and TrainSplit's site.

1704903746404.png
1704903762319.png
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Merseysider

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
22 Jan 2014
Messages
5,630
Location
Birmingham
Perhaps an unpopular opinion, but having seen how disgustingly overcrowded these services can get, anything that frees up seats for long distance passengers is a good thing.

There is a Liverpool train 3 minutes after the XC, and an Avanti 3-4 minutes after that too.

I don’t know if it’s possible, but counted place reservations for BHM-WVH journeys would be a better solution that avoids potentially overcharging anyone.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,882
Location
West of Andover
Although it will be likely be completely ignored by those who have season tickets or other walk up tickets who will still board the XC services as the next available service. Especially as it's nonstop.
 
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
988
Yep, this will not solve the problem in the evening rush, for exactly the reason that @Kite159 states above. The problem is caused by people commuting between those two stations* with season tickets, and not by people booking advance between those stations, and most of those commuters will not be swayed from just getting the first available service when they rock up to New Street.

I count myself amongst those commuters, but I'm probably in the minority in that I will avoid the Manchester train like the plague in the evening...


* Well, the problem is caused by the units being inadequate, but that's by-the-by...
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
3,450
These are almost certainly not real compulsory reservations and walk on tickets remain valid for any train including these
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,731
Location
Burgess Hill
These are almost certainly not real compulsory reservations and walk on tickets remain valid for any train including these
Well no, quite obviously that's the case, as per the compulsory reservations on Avanti, LNER and most other services.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
6,063
Location
Sheffield
CrossCountry seem to have started doing compulsory reservations on some services, but only between Birmingham New Street and Wolverhampton.

This appears to be part of an attempt to prevent walk-ups from Birmingham to Wolverhampton from being issued on these services if there are no seats remaining, and trying to force local journeys to be made on TfW/WMR/LNR.
I am not sure how the systems work, but does the change also mean it is not possible for people to book walk up tickets for longer distance journeys which include the Birmingham Wolverhampton section - e.g. Birmingham to Manchester, Oxford to Wolverhampton and so on ?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,933
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I am not sure how the systems work, but does the change also mean it is not possible for people to book walk up tickets for longer distance journeys which include the Birmingham Wolverhampton section - e.g. Birmingham to Manchester, Oxford to Wolverhampton and so on ?

Yes, it would (on those trains - you could probably force LNR+Northern/TfW to get a ticket).

What an utter, utter bodge.
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
6,063
Location
Sheffield
Yes, it would
Which is a much more serious issue in my view. As others have said most people travelling just between Birmingham and Wolverhampton will already hold tickets and will board anyway, meanwhile those wishing to make longer journeys will not be able to buy a ticket from a journey planner using site/app (which is most of them now) or TVM.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,731
Location
Burgess Hill
Yes, it would (on those trains - you could probably force LNR+Northern/TfW to get a ticket).

What an utter, utter bodge.
Well theoretically, but that's not really what we saw when looking into this. In fact, no retailer showed seating reservation availability except Trainline who offered SplitSave on Advances and allocated us seats.

1704922716825.png
image.png


And forcing the flexible off-peak ticket, it allowed no reservations to be made:

image.png


On Track Retail also didn't require reservations:

Off-Peak Single. Leamington Spa to Stoke on Trent: £40.60


And nor did GWR:

Leamington Spa to Stoke on Trent: Seat reservation is optional for this journey


Raileasy offered split flexible singles without any reservations either:

4 ticket split made up of three Anytime Day Singles and an Evening Day Single


TrainSplit offered split flexible 1st class singles, but we need to look into why the entire journey was forced to be 1st class instead of only the portion that has compulsory reservations:

4-ticket split made of Anytime Day Single 1st's


It's unclear whether most retailers are interpreting the spec wrong or whether something else is at play.

Trainline offering seats is a complete mystery, though, considering no other retailer could give us a seat reservation for that service at all, or offer advance ticket(s) for the journey.
 
Last edited:

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,822
Location
UK
It's unclear whether most retailers are interpreting the spec wrong or whether something else is at play.
It's possible that they are ignoring the en-route change to the reservation status.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,422
It's possible that they are ignoring the en-route change to the reservation status.
I assumed the CR record was being ignored too. If it still exists, that late Nottingham to Matlock service that changes at Derby could be used to test it.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,914
Which is a much more serious issue in my view. As others have said most people travelling just between Birmingham and Wolverhampton will already hold tickets and will board anyway, meanwhile those wishing to make longer journeys will not be able to buy a ticket from a journey planner using site/app (which is most of them now) or TVM.
Or, in theory (although some of the evidence shows above suggests it might not always be a problem) those on a longer journey may be forced into an even longer journey with more changes, avoiding XC. I suspect the revenue distribution (or current methods however it works this week) still favours those providing the faster and / or more frequent services?
 

SeanG

Established Member
Joined
4 May 2013
Messages
1,378
I'm not sure if these compulsory reservations are the case, having checked Cross Country's own timetable there is no mention of this (right hand column for the 1701 ex Birmingham New Street)

1705001696067.png
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,822
Location
UK
I'm not sure if these compulsory reservations are the case, having checked Cross Country's own timetable there is no mention of this (right hand column for the 1701 ex Birmingham New Street)

View attachment 150090
They exist in the electronic timetable data, which is what journey planners use when determining the reservation status of a train (and hence whether they can sell tickets without a reservation if the train shows as fully reserved).

There's certainly a problem with overcrowding - I just saw well over 100 people get off the 19:01 from Birmingham New Street at Wolverhampton - but this isn't the way to fix it. Perhaps First should be declassified for that section.
 

redreni

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
2,758
Location
Slade Green
Perhaps an unpopular opinion, but having seen how disgustingly overcrowded these services can get, anything that frees up seats for long distance passengers is a good thing.

There is a Liverpool train 3 minutes after the XC, and an Avanti 3-4 minutes after that too.

I don’t know if it’s possible, but counted place reservations for BHM-WVH journeys would be a better solution that avoids potentially overcharging anyone.
If that opinion is indeed unpopular, then I'd argue that's quite understandable.

If you're travelling a long distance and have a seat reservation while I'm travelling a short distance and have no seat reservation, under no circumstance should I be taking your seat. Even if I'm spectacularly rude and I sit in your reserved seat and refuse to move, I'm not going to be able to deny you a seat for very long, am I? I'm only travelling a short distance, remember.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,125
Well no, quite obviously that's the case, as per the compulsory reservations on Avanti, LNER and most other services.
Surely this is just there to be ignored? Any walk-up ticket is valid.
 

redreni

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
2,758
Location
Slade Green
They exist in the electronic timetable data, which is what journey planners use when determining the reservation status of a train (and hence whether they can sell tickets without a reservation if the train shows as fully reserved).

There's certainly a problem with overcrowding - I just saw well over 100 people get off the 19:01 from Birmingham New Street at Wolverhampton - but this isn't the way to fix it. Perhaps First should be declassified for that section.
Perhaps the HSTs should have been retained in the short term and replaced in the medium term?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,409
Surely this is just there to be ignored? Any walk-up ticket is valid.
Whilst true, the benefit of this with many people using the Trainline app, and e-tickets, is that the services won't appear in searches for Birmingham to Wolverhampton trains for on the day travel.

I would imagine that it also may force changes between services to be at Birmingham rather than Wolverhampton.
 

Deafdoggie

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2016
Messages
3,414
Both trainline & XC allow me to book the 18:16 Leamington to Stoke with advance and walk-up tickets and a seat reservation. They both also permit seat reservations on the 19:01 (same train) Birmingham to Wolverhampton.
Either something went wrong yesterday, or trainline and XC are both ignoring it
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,409
Both trainline & XC allow me to book the 18:16 Leamington to Stoke with advance and walk-up tickets and a seat reservation. They both also permit seat reservations on the 19:01 (same train) Birmingham to Wolverhampton.
Either something went wrong yesterday, or trainline and XC are both ignoring it
Isn't that because the train still has reservable capacity available? The point is to manage that capacity, not prevent people booking on the trains.
 

jayah

On Moderation
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,057
CrossCountry seem to have started doing compulsory reservations on some services, but only between Birmingham New Street and Wolverhampton.

This appears to be part of an attempt to prevent walk-ups from Birmingham to Wolverhampton from being issued on these services if there are no seats remaining, and trying to force local journeys to be made on TfW/WMR/LNR.

You can see on Timetable History below:




If you try booking the 17:01 service today online, you'll be forced to pay double the price for a 1st class single as there's no more standard class reservations available.

Even better, the 19:01 is also affected. This is a 3x increase in cost over the West Mids PTA evening day return which is valid on that CrossCountry service for £2.80 compared to the inflated £8.40 1st single price.

20:01 and later are not affected, and will show the £2.80 ticket on the forum's and TrainSplit's site.

View attachment 150017
View attachment 150018
Sounds like what they did during COVID, except then you could only buy First Class because they only booked up one set, and their social media were telling the railway staff and pass holders to sit in one of the unreserved coaches.
 

jayah

On Moderation
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,057
Perhaps the HSTs should have been retained in the short term and replaced in the medium term?
Their latest contract involves fitting a passenger counting system to the refurbished Voyagers, so perhaps in 3 years the decision makers will have caught up with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top