Even if companies come along that will offer to do battery repairs and servicing (and I am sure they will increase in numbers) the industry needs to stop practices such as tying a battery to a specific car, and not allowing batteries to be moved, from say a written off car with a working battery. I believe Tesla does this, and like Apple it means you are in effect forced to deal with the car maker - who can then force you to buy a brand new battery.
In such circumstances, that means insurers will be basic risk on the cost of a new battery for a Tesla that, thanks to the nice little protection racket, will have an eyewatering price.
How is replacement of a traction battery any different to say replacement of a gearbox or engine in an ICE vehicle? You're going to have to go tot the OEM in all three cases?Is not the moral of that story "don't buy a Tesla"? There are many reasons why one should not, not least not giving money to Musk.
Other manufacturers are likely to behave more conventionally I'd have thought.
I won't buy another Tesla because they've removed the indicator stalks which is ridiculous and a deal breaker for me. And there are things I don't like at all about the one I have. But it does the job I bought it for with aplomb and I never even think about where I'm going to charge. They really have set the bar in terms of how the vehicle and charging infrastructure should be made to "just work".
WRT to Musk's politics, I pay not attention and couldn't care less. For all I know the people running VW etc might be equally horrendous but just keep quiet about it. Weren't the family who own BMW supposed to be quite obnoxious? In any case, it's not a reason for me to cut my nose off and buy a vehicle that isn't as good for my purposes as the one I have
