• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

South Devon Line Wrong Way Working

Status
Not open for further replies.

dav-exe

New Member
Joined
30 Nov 2020
Messages
2
Location
Exeter
Hopefully not a stupid question, I was on the Devon Metro service headed to Paignton and we stopped in the loops at Dawlish Warren to let a XC service through, however as we left Dawlish Warren we crossed over to the Up Line to allow a GWR fast service to come past on the Down. We then returned to the Down after Teignmouth.

So, my question is, is this standard operating? Or did the signallers utilise the 2-way working to keep timings as far as possible (the fast services were all delayed that day). Wanted to ask as never had this before.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,522
Location
Plymouth
Hopefully not a stupid question, I was on the Devon Metro service headed to Paignton and we stopped in the loops at Dawlish Warren to let a XC service through, however as we left Dawlish Warren we crossed over to the Up Line to allow a GWR fast service to come past on the Down. We then returned to the Down after Teignmouth.

So, my question is, is this standard operating? Or did the signallers utilise the 2-way working to keep timings as far as possible (the fast services were all delayed that day). Wanted to ask as never had this before.
Yeah its not uncommon, happens generally in the evening when the up line is quieter. The train in question was about 25 late when it passed you, and its a happy medium where both trains are kept on the move. Nifty bit of signalling id say.
 

dav-exe

New Member
Joined
30 Nov 2020
Messages
2
Location
Exeter
Yeah, definitely a good bit of signalling - good solution to lack of loops...plus much more interesting that sitting at Warren for another 20 mins
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Quite regular and there were some booked workings. A green wrong line as you walk the wall catches my attention so am expecting it to happen.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
Quite standard. I saw it the first time on the Dawlish beach cams and had to do a double take but have seen it a few times now. Maybe I should get out a bit more.
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
708
In 2014, in the storm our train ( a 150) tried to go towards the tunnel after Dawlish as the waves were hitting us. Couldnt proceed as we could all hear the ballast being washed away in front of and under the train. After a wait for signal box Ok, driver changed ends and we reversed back up the down line to a crossover (might of even been Dawlish Warren) driver swoops again and we proceed down the up line and see if we can go through on that one. No go, we then ran back and terminated. In the night the washout occurred and I was on the bus for the next three months. So I' m sure the bi running is very useful in a variety of different situations.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Quite regular and there were some booked workings. A green wrong line as you walk the wall catches my attention so am expecting it to happen.
Closer to home, Stowmarket not unknown for an up train to be signalled over to the down side, to allow a late running up road train to pass.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Closer to home, Stowmarket not unknown for an up train to be signalled over to the down side, to allow a late running up road train to pass.

Happened to me a few times at Chelmsford too.
 

apinnard

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2017
Messages
385
Location
Kettering
Closer to home, Stowmarket not unknown for an up train to be signalled over to the down side, to allow a late running up road train to pass.

Change back at Claydon, or Ipswich??

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Happened to me a few times at Chelmsford too.
I’ve been on a couple of wrong line trips Chelmsford to Church Lane that have involved overtaking in times of disruption.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Change back at Claydon, or Ipswich??

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


I’ve been on a couple of wrong line trips Chelmsford to Church Lane that have involved overtaking in times of disruption.

If going wrong road onto the down line at Stowmarket you cross back immediately ahead of the Down loop. The bidirectional signalling is only south of Colchester.

Yes bi-di is frequently used at short notice where it is available.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Diss is very similar but wrong direction is on the opposite track and available over the up.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
If going wrong road onto the down line at Stowmarket you cross back immediately ahead of the Down loop. The bidirectional signalling is only south of Colchester.

Yes bi-di is frequently used at short notice where it is available.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Diss is very similar but wrong direction is on the opposite track and available over the up.
Manningtree would be very useful....but alas never done :(
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Manningtree would be very useful....but alas never done :(

Always surprised me that. Done it a few times over the down but alas it’s not a signalled move except for the position light at the London end. Wonder why it wasn’t incorporated back in the 80s? Reminds of the day the duty traincrew manager agreed to the Thunderbird leaving Norwich later than the booked 04:45 to sit at Colchester. The 05:30 decided to sit down at Manningtree with delays racking up and Anglia getting a £38k bill. Costly mistake that lol.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,484
Location
Taunton or Kent
In 2014, in the storm our train ( a 150) tried to go towards the tunnel after Dawlish as the waves were hitting us. Couldnt proceed as we could all hear the ballast being washed away in front of and under the train. After a wait for signal box Ok, driver changed ends and we reversed back up the down line to a crossover (might of even been Dawlish Warren) driver swoops again and we proceed down the up line and see if we can go through on that one. No go, we then ran back and terminated. In the night the washout occurred and I was on the bus for the next three months. So I' m sure the bi running is very useful in a variety of different situations.
I wondered if the primary reason for that bi-directional option was for rough weather, as the line with wrong-sided operation possible is further from the sea. However there isn't much difference in it width-wise, and that doesn't account for a risk of cliff collapse on the line (although reinforcement works for that have happened too).
 
Last edited:

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,465
Location
Despond
On a similar note, does the West Highland still use right-hand running at passing loops, or has that been changed with RETB? I'm fairly sure it used to be the case at Rannoch, for instance.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,959
Location
Airedale
I wondered if the primary reason for that bi-directional option was for rough weather, as the line with wrong-sided operation possible is further from the sea.
Yes, it was. 4m or so does make a difference!
However there isn't much difference in it width-wise, and that doesn't account for a risk of cliff collapse on the line (although reinforcement works for that have happened too).
Cliff falls are less predictable than high tides and SE winds, though :)
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,560
Location
Northampton
On a similar note, does the West Highland still use right-hand running at passing loops, or has that been changed with RETB? I'm fairly sure it used to be the case at Rannoch, for instance.
AFAIK yes, although I believe it was RETB that drove that change as it made shunting easier at some locations with the self-acting (hydraulic?, often incorrectly referred to as 'sprung') points for access to sidings.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,465
Location
Despond
AFAIK yes, although I believe it was RETB that drove that change as it made shunting easier at some locations with the self-acting (hydraulic?, often incorrectly referred to as 'sprung') points for access to sidings.
Sorry, I was misremembering how (relatively) far back RETB was introduced. I think I was mixing it up with the time of introduction of ERTMS on the Cambrian :lol: Wasn't it an 80s thing?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,560
Location
Northampton
Sorry, I was misremembering how (relatively) far back RETB was introduced. I think I was mixing it up with the time of introduction of ERTMS on the Cambrian :lol: Wasn't it an 80s thing?

It was indeed. Cambrian ETCS was 2008, the East Suffolk lines went to TCB a couple of years ago. RETB is sometimes mentioned in various proposals for getting rid of manual signal boxes or token block working on lines that don't justify full TCB, but so far I don't think any of them got anywhere.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,465
Location
Despond

It was indeed. Cambrian ETCS was 2008, the East Suffolk lines went to TCB a couple of years ago. RETB is sometimes mentioned in various proposals for getting rid of manual signal boxes or token block working on lines that don't justify full TCB, but so far I don't think any of them got anywhere.
Thanks for the link, I haven't come across that site before - very interesting!
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Always surprised me that. Done it a few times over the down but alas it’s not a signalled move except for the position light at the London end. Wonder why it wasn’t incorporated back in the 80s? Reminds of the day the duty traincrew manager agreed to the Thunderbird leaving Norwich later than the booked 04:45 to sit at Colchester. The 05:30 decided to sit down at Manningtree with delays racking up and Anglia getting a £38k bill. Costly mistake that lol.
Yes, unsignalled move from Up Main to Down Main, then back to Up Main, although covered by the GPL's from the CCTV onwards!
In theory SLW needed to get around a failure etc, but if I was on duty, and Driver happy, would allow one train to get past the problem.
always told Control, if you dont ask any questions on 'how' ... I wont tell you a lie ! but everyone was always happy that the train behind didnt meet with an hour+ of delay !
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Yes, unsignalled move from Up Main to Down Main, then back to Up Main, although covered by the GPL's from the CCTV onwards!
In theory SLW needed to get around a failure etc, but if I was on duty, and Driver happy, would allow one train to get past the problem.
always told Control, if you dont ask any questions on 'how' ... I wont tell you a lie ! but everyone was always happy that the train behind didnt meet with an hour+ of delay !

You know me mate, always happy work through such issues & was a pleasure when you were on duty.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
You know me mate, always happy work through such issues & was a pleasure when you were on duty.
Thankyou for that, appreciated :) The PSB is a different place now I fear.
 

gazr

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2014
Messages
561
As far as Manningtree goes, there was SLW through P3 last Sunday (24th September) all day whilst P1 was being relayed. Believe it caused some delays to start with.
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,810
Location
West is best
Best use of bidirectional signalling I ever saw, was during a cable fault. The fault caused a loss of the normal directional signalling on both the up line and the down line on part of the GWML.

Hence it was gently suggested that the reversible signalling be used (as this was operational). Hence for a large part of the day up trains used the down line and down trains used the up line…

I’ve also seen both lines of a bidirectional signalled route used to ease congestion when extra (diverted) traffic is using the route due to another line being closed.

Some years ago, one particular signaller liked to use the maximum capacity of routes and junctions, and in the process occasionally discovered faults that were either design issues or which were normal failures that no one else had reported. Made life rather interesting.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
As far as Manningtree goes, there was SLW through P3 last Sunday (24th September) all day whilst P1 was being relayed. Believe it caused some delays to start with.
Around 15-20 minutes to many trains.
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,050
Location
Bristol
On a similar note, does the West Highland still use right-hand running at passing loops, or has that been changed with RETB? I'm fairly sure it used to be the case at Rannoch, for instance.
It actually uses a mix of left and right hand running I think unless it's changed.
Crianlarich was LHS last time I was there, long after RETB came in.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,465
Location
Despond
It actually uses a mix of left and right hand running I think unless it's changed.
Crianlarich was LHS last time I was there, long after RETB came in.
Now you mention it, I think it's left-hand at Glenfinnan also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top