• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Passenger numbers after the holiday period

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
11 Jan 2015
Messages
972
The high peak London commuter trains I regularly use are very definitely NOT full. If anyone can turn them into diesel services for those places which are busy in the week and turn them back to EMUs for the increasingly busy Saturdays in the south east then I’m sure the laws of physics and engineering will welcome your ability to move the sum of human knowledge forward.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,030
Location
London
Is 'reform of rail fares' a euphemism here for making them cheaper? Reforming rail fares on a neutral basis could easily backfire if they got it wrong.

I note that the flexi-season was a step towards fare reform that some people suggest is one of the reasons people haven't returned to their office in large numbers, but suspect the reality is that people just have to take whatever the offer is.

It was more that the government have evidently found the money to subsidise bus fares and extend it, whilst not looking at rail fares really at all besides the flexi-season which isn’t beneficial for most people.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,988
Location
Airedale
It was more that the government have evidently found the money to subsidise bus fares and extend it,
As bus fares are not AFAIK subsidised by Central Government (except via ENCTS), and local authorities are not exactly flush with cash, the alternative (given the still-suppressed demand) would have been massive cuts to services.
Even with the flat fare scheme, the routes local to me in Saltaire are still operating at 2/3 of pre-Covid levels..
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,612
Location
Wales
The high peak London commuter trains I regularly use are very definitely NOT full. If anyone can turn them into diesel services for those places which are busy in the week and turn them back to EMUs for the increasingly busy Saturdays in the south east then I’m sure the laws of physics and engineering will welcome your ability to move the sum of human knowledge forward.
You can't have them back on Saturdays, that's the busiest day of the week around here.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
My other half works from home. She can drink on work nights and can even lie in thanks to flexible working hours.

Personally I'd hate to work from home but I can see it's a big draw for some who in many cases are still getting pay rises without the costs of travelling to work.

I think a lot of it depends on your commute.

If you have a long tiring commute then WFH is more attractive (and this is perhaps the railway's problem, though by all accounts the effect on peak travel is exaggerated, given the constant reports on here of crowded peak trains - perhaps for political purposes, to give an excuse for railway funding cuts).

If you have a short commute then the benefits of the office (getting out of the house/change of scene, social interaction with colleagues) begin to trump the disadvantages.

I wonder also if it depends on season? WFH is, IMO, better in the spring and summer, when it's light for many hours after 5pm and when you can get out of the house and go for a walk (assuming you live somewhere reasonably pleasant). On the other hand in Nov-Jan in particular where it's dark before 5pm and gloomy and dismal even during the short hours of daylight before that, it feels to me quite claustrophobic being stuck in the house. So in the winter months I actually tend to go into the office more, even if I don't have to. (FWIW my mode of commute is a short bus journey, and sometimes walking in spring and summer).

The area in which you live is another factor. If you live somewhere pleasant again WFH has its benefits. If you don't, and you can't go out for a local walk easily (for example) then again the benefits of the office begin to trump the disadvantages.
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,414
Location
Yorks
The high peak London commuter trains I regularly use are very definitely NOT full. If anyone can turn them into diesel services for those places which are busy in the week and turn them back to EMUs for the increasingly busy Saturdays in the south east then I’m sure the laws of physics and engineering will welcome your ability to move the sum of human knowledge forward.
Is 'reform of rail fares' a euphemism here for making them cheaper? Reforming rail fares on a neutral basis could easily backfire if they got it wrong.

I note that the flexi-season was a step towards fare reform that some people suggest is one of the reasons people haven't returned to their office in large numbers, but suspect the reality is that people just have to take whatever the offer is.

It certainly should be. It's about time our shambolic and overpriced fares system was brought closer into line with sensible countries.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The high peak London commuter trains I regularly use are very definitely NOT full. If anyone can turn them into diesel services for those places which are busy in the week and turn them back to EMUs for the increasingly busy Saturdays in the south east then I’m sure the laws of physics and engineering will welcome your ability to move the sum of human knowledge forward.

The more likely outcome at present is that the units enabling more intense peak/weekend services to meet demand will be scrapped regardless.
 
Joined
11 Jan 2015
Messages
972
You can't have them back on Saturdays, that's the busiest day of the week around here.
Indeed. That’s the problem. Elizabeth line into London from Slough decently busy on BH Monday at 4pm: Thameslink southwards also busy; local train to Purley Oaks pretty empty.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,030
Location
London
As bus fares are not AFAIK subsidised by Central Government (except via ENCTS), and local authorities are not exactly flush with cash, the alternative (given the still-suppressed demand) would have been massive cuts to services.
Even with the flat fare scheme, the routes local to me in Saltaire are still operating at 2/3 of pre-Covid levels..

But they’ve been fine with cuts to rail services. It’s just an observation that one mode of public transport has been seen worthy of extra subsidy whilst another hasn’t, even if obviously the economics are different.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

My other half works from home. She can drink on work nights and can even lie in thanks to flexible working hours.

Personally I'd hate to work from home but I can see it's a big draw for some who in many cases are still getting pay rises without the costs of travelling to work.

I wouldn’t mind it now and again (and have on occasion) but I wouldn’t want to constantly either. I think there’s definitely an element of personality as to whether you do or not.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

If you have a long tiring commute then WFH is more attractive (and this is perhaps the railway's problem, though by all accounts the effect on peak travel is exaggerated, given the constant reports on here of crowded peak trains - perhaps for political purposes, to give an excuse for railway funding cuts).

If you have a short commute then the benefits of the office (getting out of the house/change of scene, social interaction with colleagues) begin to trump the disadvantages.

Also if you have a short commute you are likely commuting from a suburb or the urban part of the city, whereas a longer commute is probably from a smaller town or a drive to the local station. People with shorter commutes would generally have smaller homes (particularly in London) and have a more cramped WFH set up which might not be so desirable than a nice open plan, air conditioned office with the potential to meet colleagues (truer for younger staff).
 
Last edited:

higthomas

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2012
Messages
1,227
It was more that the government have evidently found the money to subsidise bus fares and extend it, whilst not looking at rail fares really at all besides the flexi-season which isn’t beneficial for most people.
IIRC I once heard it would cost about £3billion a year to make all buses in the UK (or perhaps England) free all the time. Given that, I suspect their current £2 max fare (which I suspect only cover perhaps 20% of non-ENTCS bus given journeys) is a relative drop in the ocean compared to what the treasury fear rail reform might cost.
 

WoodHillsian

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2019
Messages
19
Location
South Wales Valleys
I was shocked travelling on the 0723 Cardiff to London back on Friday 11 August - about 90 seats in my carriage, 4 occupied - a couple more people got on at Bristol Parkway, then 2 more at Swindon. But coming back on an off-peak on that evening it was standing room only. Looks like a lot of people are doing the shprt week, and not travelling for work on Fridays.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
Is 'reform of rail fares' a euphemism here for making them cheaper? Reforming rail fares on a neutral basis could easily backfire if they got it wrong.
In today's world if any politician promises "reform of rail fares", you can absolutely bet they mean making them more expensive. ;)

Certainly in my experience "reform" or "revise" is usually a euphemism for making something worse (usually more expensive and/or more difficult) for the customer/employee (delete as applicable).
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,368
I think your example at Stockport is spot on. The imbalance of what services are actually being used and those that are not is now completely skewed to where we where 10 years ago. In my view, it further undermines the need for HS2.
The railways being in a weaker financial position strengthens the position of HS2 because it will allow major reductions in operating costs on the money pit that is the WCML
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,728
The railways being in a weaker financial position strengthens the position of HS2 because it will allow major reductions in operating costs on the money pit that is the WCML
Why is the WCML a money pit?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,888
Location
East Anglia
I was shocked travelling on the 0723 Cardiff to London back on Friday 11 August - about 90 seats in my carriage, 4 occupied - a couple more people got on at Bristol Parkway, then 2 more at Swindon. But coming back on an off-peak on that evening it was standing room only. Looks like a lot of people are doing the shprt week, and not travelling for work on Fridays.

That’s quite normal for a Friday morning & often was before the pandemic.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,722
Location
Leeds
As bus fares are not AFAIK subsidised by Central Government (except via ENCTS), and local authorities are not exactly flush with cash, the alternative (given the still-suppressed demand) would have been massive cuts to services.
Even with the flat fare scheme, the routes local to me in Saltaire are still operating at 2/3 of pre-Covid levels..
Unless it changed post-Covid, Local Transport Authorities were responsible for reimbursing ENCTS (rather like social care - a policy the government can claim it came up with, but which is funded locally). WYCA, for example, used to negotiate multi-year deals. LTAs could extend the validity period outside of the core 0930-2300 s they saw fit and were able to afford - it West Yorkshire it's until the last bus, South Yorkshire used to be from 0900, trams can be included if you have them.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,612
Location
Wales
In today's world if any politician promises "reform of rail fares", you can absolutely bet they mean making them more expensive. ;)
Or more complicated. Or both.

Certainly in my experience "reform" or "revise" is usually a euphemism for making something worse (usually more expensive and/or more difficult) for the customer/employee (delete as applicable).
See also: "modernisation".
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,338
Location
Bolton
But new flexiseason tickets are being purchased by hybrid workers and they generate more revenue per journey than traditional season tickets.
These aren't really that relevant anyway because the volume of Flexi Seasons sold is tiny, only a little over a tenth of all season sales.
 

Adrian1980uk

Member
Joined
24 May 2016
Messages
843
These aren't really that relevant anyway because the volume of Flexi Seasons sold is tiny, only a little over a tenth of all season sales.
Flexi season tickets don't work for me, as I'm sure for a lot of people, I know I'm rare by working in different offices so I'm once a week London and once a week Milton Keynes but I sure hybrid workers are also struggling as you buy 8 trips a month but have a day off and you're losing.. full season tickets were different as you were daily so always gaining even with annual leave
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,338
Location
Bolton
Flexi season tickets don't work for me, as I'm sure for a lot of people, I know I'm rare by working in different offices so I'm once a week London and once a week Milton Keynes but I sure hybrid workers are also struggling as you buy 8 trips a month but have a day off and you're losing.. full season tickets were different as you were daily so always gaining even with annual leave
The problem is 28 days is far too short. If you don't use your days up within 28 days you lose their value, and can't claim credit or money back in respect of them. This more than wipes out the slim (roughly) 10% saving on offer.

Stagecoach's bus flexi tickets come, in general, in bundles of 5 or 10 and you have 365 days to use them. At minimum for an 8 day bundle they should allow 64 days. If you buy the bundle of 10 you get a 30% discount on Stagecoach too, which is sensible. If you only buy 5, you get a 20% discount.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,612
Location
Wales
The problem is 28 days is far too short. If you don't use your days up within 28 days you lose their value, and can't claim credit or money back in respect of them. This more than wipes out the slim (roughly) 10% saving on offer.

Stagecoach's bus flexi tickets come, in general, in bundles of 5 or 10 and you have 365 days to use them. At minimum for an 8 day bundle they should allow 64 days. If you buy the bundle of 10 you get a 30% discount on Stagecoach too, which is sensible. If you only buy 5, you get a 20% discount.
TfW have a Multiflex carnet that offers 12 singles for the price of 5 returns. You've got 3 months to use them up in which means that you only need to make one return journey a fortnight. It also means that night shift workers who go out today and come back tomorrow don't lose out, as they would if using a flexi season, ditto anyone who only gets the train in one direction (say they return by bus or get a lift).
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,338
Location
Bolton
TfW have a Multiflex carnet that offers 12 singles for the price of 5 returns. You've got 3 months to use them up in which means that you only need to make one return journey a fortnight. It also means that night shift workers who go out today and come back tomorrow don't lose out, as they would if using a flexi season, ditto anyone who only gets the train in one direction (say they return by bus or get a lift).
Indeed - the TfW product is much more flexible on time and terms. The ScotRail one is also a very slightly better discount percentage at 15% rather than around 10%. Both are better than their counterpart in England. I think they're both quite long-standing too.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
6,612
Location
Wales
The TfW one was introduced under ATW, then it was 6 returns rather than 12 singles
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,224
Location
West Wiltshire
The DfT has updated the usage spreadsheet since start of pandemic, rail data is column G compared to 2019

12-24 Aug between 96-99%
25 Aug (Fri before bank hol) 102%
26 Aug 97%
27 Aug 97%
28 Aug (Bank hol) 101%
29 Aug 100%
30 Aug 94%
31 Aug 96%
1 -3 Sept all 89% (strike weekend)

So looks like holiday usage is back to normal, too early for figures for Sept

 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,988
Location
Airedale
The DfT has updated the usage spreadsheet since start of pandemic, rail data is column G compared to 2019
Thanks.
So in August, when commuters are disproportionately on holiday and business travel was (consequently) always low, things are pretty much back to normal (by numbers, perhaps not by revenue).
That confirms what we already knew or at least surmised.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,946
Location
UK
It seems that more and more businesses are getting people back in to the office 3 or 4 days a week, perhaps even every day with days at home now being something you'd ask for occasionally and not the norm, so I wonder if monthly and annual season ticket sales are rising again as people are at the level where they're the best value again?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,888
Location
East Anglia
It seems that more and more businesses are getting people back in to the office 3 or 4 days a week, perhaps even every day with days at home now being something you'd ask for occasionally and not the norm, so I wonder if monthly and annual season ticket sales are rising again as people are at the level where they're the best value again?
Good to hear.
 

Taplowgreen

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2019
Messages
52
It seems that more and more businesses are getting people back in to the office 3 or 4 days a week, perhaps even every day with days at home now being something you'd ask for occasionally and not the norm, so I wonder if monthly and annual season ticket sales are rising again as people are at the level where they're the best value again?
I'd be interested in your evidence that this is the pattern for businesses?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top