• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WCML after HS2 opens

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,522
Location
Northampton
So if you were designing a railway service, your two biggest markets are Milton Keynes and Northampton, so why would you provide Northampton with the same service level as Wolverton or Long Buckby which are barely a small fraction of the size, it makes no economic sense.
Wolverton and Long Buckby have wider catchment areas than just the settlements of the same name - Wolverton is MK north and Long Buckby is essentially a parkway station. However the bigger part of it is operational - you are travelling through those stations, stopping costs 2 minutes. Not stopping on the Slow lines reduces capacity as freight then needs to avoid delaying the passenger trains, so the cost of the stop is offset slightly as the journey time penalty would be there anyway.
If you're going to be penalised 2-3 minutes stuck behind a freight, you may as well take the opportunity for a bit of extra revenue, especially at Long Buckby which being the far side of Northampton from London is less costly to delay Northampton passengers at.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
2,158
Location
Reading
Wolverton and Long Buckby have wider catchment areas than just the settlements of the same name - Wolverton is MK north and Long Buckby is essentially a parkway station. However the bigger part of it is operational - you are travelling through those stations, stopping costs 2 minutes. Not stopping on the Slow lines reduces capacity as freight then needs to avoid delaying the passenger trains, so the cost of the stop is offset slightly as the journey time penalty would be there anyway.
If you're going to be penalised 2-3 minutes stuck behind a freight, you may as well take the opportunity for a bit of extra revenue, especially at Long Buckby which being the far side of Northampton from London is less costly to delay Northampton passengers at.

Most trains stop at Northampton for a good 10-15 minutes anyway, so no end-to-end journey time gains to be had.
 

JW4

Member
Joined
14 Feb 2023
Messages
311
Location
Birmingham
Not the first thread on this,


== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Them being both closed for replies is probably why this one opened up
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
5,078
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
I don’t know why we have this debate so often with speculation.

The indicative plan (which of course is subject to change) is as below. This is published in the HS2 full business case, which is a public document. Variations are being worked on, but they are variations of this, and not a complete rehash


View attachment 140986View attachment 140987

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



No, it wouldn’t add capacity.

And the driver of maintenance on the line on future will be freight, not the linespeed of the fastest trains.
The slow line/LNR patterns shown there are pre-Covid and have already been entirely rehashed, so going back to that as base to vary seems most odd if that’s still the base as you say.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
2,131
When is (was?) HS2 due to open, where from and where to?? There is So much can and will change between now and then, but interesting to speculate ;)
A new government, or two, or four? Howevermany ministers, departments, franchises or whatever TOCs, fright, stock, Covids 2 and 3, Commuting, WFH, and WTx ...
Maybe a new MK or two?
From Not in my Backyard to Not in my Lifetime. No platforming at Euston and Cancel Culture- enjoy watching Abandoned Engineering. Hoping to be wrong.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,759
The slow line/LNR patterns shown there are pre-Covid and have already been entirely rehashed, so going back to that as base to vary seems most odd if that’s still the base as you say.

Well, admittedly that’s quite a large variation, but the principle still stands in terms of what the ‘Avanti’ service will look like, and (broadly) service patterns South of Rugby even if country origin points are different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top