The Middle
Member
Good to see a common sense approach being taken by EMR to bring them back out for some crowd busting
I used the 180 with Hull Trains all the time. They had long been held together with proverbial spit and chewing gum, and more than a little hope. They were absolutely wrecked inside and out when they left Hull. You used to see them at Hull sidings with the fitter onboard all night, desperately trying to get the set to work well enough to get to London even with an engine or two out. Corrosion was obvious even to the casual observer let alone an eagle eyes engineer like myself.There is an inspection and the returning TOC has to pay for any shortcomings, unless the ROSCO waives the charges.
I didn’t think the HT units were returned in that bad a state. There was a discussion about the corrosion, which has been evident for a few years now.
What have the poor Yorkies done to deserve that? Hope that they actually get to the game! Given how unreliable the "Ronson's" are that isn't a given.....Not quite dead yet! Apparently being brought back out on Monday to help shift the Wednesday and Barnsley fans
When do they go off lease? I presume too soon for even more common sense to be applied to the Skegness trains.Good to see a common sense approach being taken by EMR to bring them back out for some crowd busting
GC can barely run the services they have let alone apply for more. A few, even more clapped out 180's from EMR aren't going to help them.Do we know if GC are chasing any additional paths, or have sufficient paths to run more services? Or is this just to double up their diagrams?
Off topic for this thread but it has been reported elsewhere on the forum that GC will be taking 10x221GC can barely run the services they have let alone apply for more. A few, even more clapped out 180's from EMR aren't going to help them.
Grand Central's operating license is up for renewal in December 2026. Now I see one of two thing happening. Most likely, DB will refuse to finance GC further, and Grand Central will dissappear in December 2026, and they'll simply carry on and rag the 180's to pieces until then. Very, very unlikely is that DB applies to extend their license this year, and orders bi-mode 80X's giving a 3 year lead time to the December 2026 timetable change.
I think the former is far more likely. I get the definite impression that DB wants Arriva out of open access. GC is just a moneypit to DB. They'll carry on with XC because they get government subsidies there, but they'll continue to contract XC services onto the core. Perhaps even divest XC regional services in a year or two.
GC can barely run the services they have let alone apply for more. A few, even more clapped out 180's from EMR aren't going to help them.
Grand Central's operating license is up for renewal in December 2026. Now I see one of two thing happening. Most likely, DB will refuse to finance GC further, and Grand Central will dissappear in December 2026, and they'll simply carry on and rag the 180's to pieces until then. Very, very unlikely is that DB applies to extend their license this year, and orders bi-mode 80X's giving a 3 year lead time to the December 2026 timetable change.
I think the former is far more likely. I get the definite impression that DB wants Arriva out of open access. GC is just a moneypit to DB. They'll carry on with XC because they get government subsidies there, but they'll continue to contract XC services onto the core. Perhaps even divest XC regional services in a year or two.
Off topic for this thread but it has been reported elsewhere on the forum that GC will be taking 10x221
is this personal opinion from someone whos against OAO or is there any factual evidence to back up your 2 so called opinions. No one knows where GC will end up in the comming years nor any other TOC be that matter. GC are currently doing better in leisure travel in particular on weekends. Better that LNER, XC are currently struggling to get back to pre pandemic levels come an article i read a few months ago.Grand Central's operating license is up for renewal in December 2026. Now I see one of two thing happening. Most likely, DB will refuse to finance GC further, and Grand Central will dissappear in December 2026, and they'll simply carry on and rag the 180's to pieces until then. Very, very unlikely is that DB applies to extend their license this year, and orders bi-mode 80X's giving a 3 year lead time to the December 2026 timetable change.
Impression to how, please elaborate. DB, as mentioned are seeking to sell Arriva where Arriva are running GC to a certain degree. Money pit that may well be especially in terms of the cost of the maintenance of the 180s however, as mentioned the income they have made post pandemic is at the top of many TOCs in the UK.I think the former is far more likely. I get the definite impression that DB wants Arriva out of open access. GC is just a moneypit to DB. They'll carry on with XC because they get government subsidies there, but they'll continue to contract XC services onto the core. Perhaps even divest XC regional services in a year or two.
On that subject, when did DB announce its intention to sell Arriva?Please feel free to post any substantial information that may back up your claims.
Here.On that subject, when did DB announce its intention to sell Arriva?
Surely if the company wasn't making any money, then they wouldn't need to wait for the ops licence renewal you speak of to close down?Grand Central's operating license is up for renewal in December 2026. Now I see one of two thing happening. Most likely, DB will refuse to finance GC further, and Grand Central will dissappear in December 2026, and they'll simply carry on and rag the 180's to pieces until then. Very, very unlikely is that DB applies to extend their license this year, and orders bi-mode 80X's giving a 3 year lead time to the December 2026 timetable change.
I think the former is far more likely. I get the definite impression that DB wants Arriva out of open access. GC is just a moneypit to DB. They'll carry on with XC because they get government subsidies there, but they'll continue to contract XC services onto the core. Perhaps even divest XC regional services in a year or two.
WSMR was certainly pulled before track access agreement was up.Surely if the company wasn't making any money, then they wouldn't need to wait for the ops licence renewal you speak of to close down?
Did Wrexham & Shropshire have to wait until their licence/track access was up for renewal?
If GC didn't make money then surely the logical thing to do would have been to never bring the company back after COVID?
The fact that they did, says to me that the company is profitable. I've never been on an empty GC train and I use them pretty often.
Indeed. I believe they need to renew it every ten years so have already gone through the process once!WSMR was certainly pulled before track access agreement was up.
Arriva have always been committed to GC and it can make them money. GC taking on 221's ex AWC shows they are willing to find a suitable replacement even if there current licence expires in 2026.
That’s probably best for a speculative thread, but realistically why would the government fund XC taking on 180s when it is reducing the HST diagrams at the same time? Seems unlikelyAnyone know what is to become of the 180s now they’ve been withdrawn by EMR and looks like the GC ones are to be replaced by AWC 221s? I highly doubt it but Maybe XC to provide some extra capacity for now or maybe wishful thinking as we could do with the capacity?
I suspect the answer will involve Wilkinson Sword or Gillette...Anyone know what is to become of the 180s now they’ve been withdrawn by EMR and looks like the GC ones are to be replaced by AWC 221s? I highly doubt it but Maybe XC to provide some extra capacity for now or maybe wishful thinking as we could do with the capacity?
Unreliable, prone to catching fire and allegedly suffering badly from corrosion....I suspect the answer will involve Wilkinson Sword or Gillette...
The DfT signals are that the franchised railway is reducing capacity so I am guessing that if DfT wanted to allow XC to increase capacity they would have authorised the lease of 221142 and 221143 with tilt removal.That’s probably best for a speculative thread, but realistically why would the government fund XC taking on 180s when it is reducing the HST diagrams at the same time? Seems unlikely
Like I say it’s possible but highly unlikely. Should just keep the HSTs as DaFT obviously don’t know or care about how dire XC capacity is!That’s probably best for a speculative thread, but realistically why would the government fund XC taking on 180s when it is reducing the HST diagrams at the same time? Seems unlikely
Seen it mentioned elsewhere that an EMR unit was left in a bit of a sorry state by Sheffield Wednesday fans this morning, don't know if it was a 180 or a 222 though.3 of the 4 180s out today - one of them is not on the extra diagrams - e.g. 180110 is on https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G69912/2023-05-29/detailed#allox_id=0 and https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:G69847/2023-05-29/detailed
It seems like there are a few cancellations due to faults on 222s today according to EMRs status checker.
How the tables have turnedIt seems like there are a few cancellations due to faults on 222s today according to EMRs status checker.
GC can barely run the services they have let alone apply for more. A few, even more clapped out 180's from EMR aren't going to help them.
Grand Central's operating license is up for renewal in December 2026. Now I see one of two thing happening. Most likely, DB will refuse to finance GC further, and Grand Central will dissappear in December 2026, and they'll simply carry on and rag the 180's to pieces until then. Very, very unlikely is that DB applies to extend their license this year, and orders bi-mode 80X's giving a 3 year lead time to the December 2026 timetable change.
I think the former is far more likely. I get the definite impression that DB wants Arriva out of open access. GC is just a moneypit to DB. They'll carry on with XC because they get government subsidies there, but they'll continue to contract XC services onto the core. Perhaps even divest XC regional services in a year or two.
The 222s are worked very hard so this isn't surprisingHow the tables have turned![]()
I heard somewhere that 222103 is running on 1/5 engines, is this true?