Even if the next election is delayed until October, it won't be in the 18-24 month bracket.
True, but I think 17.5 months is rather splitting hairs at that point

Even if the next election is delayed until October, it won't be in the 18-24 month bracket.

I suspect a significant chunk of the swing to the Greens will be from Corbyn fans unhappy at Labour's move back to centre.I see that there has been a decent showing for the Greens this time around.
I wonder if this debunks the myth that the electorate aren't interested in issues such as public transport.
I suspect a significant chunk of the swing to the Greens will be from Corbyn fans unhappy at Labour's move back to centre.
Personally I think public transport is something a lot of voters care about anyway, maybe not the majority but a very large minority well in excess of the numbers who vote Green.
Blimey thats a shame isn't it?Either way, they appear to be screwed from both ends.![]()
A lot of seats arn't up for grabs, Birmingham for example.I wonder if the West Midlands is the anomaly because of the Mayor of West Midlands Andy Street who despite being a Conservative managed to increase his vote share in the last Mayoral election and is generally quite popular.
I came within just 46 votes, of adding an extra Labour gain and extra Conservative loss in Penn ward, Wolverhampton.Latest (after 218 of 230 councils)
Conservatives have lost over 1000 councillors (-1013)
Labour up 508
Lib Dem up 403
Greens up 237
Councils :
Conservatives -45
Labour +21
Lib Dem +11
no overall control +11
Poor results for the Conservatives in the south-east continue. Lewes (East Sussex) now has no Conservative councillors - 17 Green, 15 Lib Dem, 9 Labour. They did have a LibDem MP until 2015 but to go to zero must be a bit of a shock, they were the largest party until yesterday.
This sort of detail is missing from the BBC updates where a hung council is a hung council is a hung council - so is interesting to see.
Doesn't seem to be a huge amount of change in the West Midlands as a whole.
Of the 164 seats up for election, Dudley, Walsall, Wolverhampton, Sandwell, Solihull and Coventry combined have seen net changes of Labour -1, Tories +1, Lib Dem +1, Independent -1
My local (Mid-Sussex) has gone to NOC. That's a welcome seismic shift given the Tories often parachute one of their candidates into the very ward I vote in!Poor results for the Conservatives in the south-east continue. Lewes (East Sussex) now has no Conservative councillors - 17 Green, 15 Lib Dem, 9 Labour. They did have a LibDem MP until 2015 but to go to zero must be a bit of a shock, they were the largest party until yesterday.
I've been wondering to myself if Labour are going to do more poorly in future in places where there are various large concentrations of religious groups. Religious Groups are more likely to be socially conservative and may care more about 'what a women is' or something along those lines, than other, non religious, people.So Labour have a net loss of seats in the West Midlands.
This is the sort of area where they need to gain seats if they want to win the next general election.
That looks like straw clutching. The Tories have taken a well deserved beating. Hopefully tactical voting will deliver another one at the next general election. Get 'em out.So Labour have a net loss of seats in the West Midlands.
This is the sort of area where they need to gain seats if they want to win the next general election.
So Labour have a net loss of seats in the West Midlands.
This is the sort of area where they need to gain seats if they want to win the next general election.
So Labour have a net loss of seats in the West Midlands.
This is the sort of area where they need to gain seats if they want to win the next general election.
Task 1 for Wyre Forest Council - massive pay rises for themselves...Task 1 for all those new labour councils - massive pay rises for themselves
Task 2 - buying any shopping centres on life support* for top dollar to try and 'save' them from the evil private sector and other wasteful expenses like £2,000 top end laptops for work.
There will be many disappointed voters that Kiers 'promises' that a vote for him would mean NHS waiting lists get slashed (waiting list to get onto the waiting listand council tax won't rise. He better get some actual policies** ready for the next election other "we are not as bad as the Tories" and "we will tax the rich so much they won't simply decide to move abroad so we get nothing". Although why would anybody believe Sir Kier, for he does change his mind depending which way the bandwagon is moving.
* - the sort which have more empty units than filled, on a death feedback loop.
** Other than bringing back pointless Covid restrictions if that cold bug makes a come back in the winter.
John Curtice (who generally knows his stuff) is saying that the vote share shown yesterday, extrapolated over the country, would make Labour the biggest party at the next General Election - but about 20 seats short of a majority. Which doesn't seem much of an endorsement for Starmer's leadership, given how much the Tories are detested by just about everyone at this point, including most of their own supporters.
Labour vote share appears to be about 8-10% ahead of the Tories. The last two times we were 18-24 months out from a change in government, the gap was much much larger - in 1995 the Labour lead was 22%, and in 2008 the Tories were 20% ahead of Labour.
Not a 1997 type majority though?I'm therefore still thinking a Labour majority is the most likely outcome at the next election.
Task 1 for all those new labour councils - massive pay rises for themselves
Task 2 - buying any shopping centres on life support* for top dollar to try and 'save' them from the evil private sector and other wasteful expenses like £2,000 top end laptops for work.
There will be many disappointed voters that Kiers 'promises' that a vote for him would mean NHS waiting lists get slashed (waiting list to get onto the waiting listand council tax won't rise. He better get some actual policies** ready for the next election other "we are not as bad as the Tories" and "we will tax the rich so much they won't simply decide to move abroad so we get nothing". Although why would anybody believe Sir Kier, for he does change his mind depending which way the bandwagon is moving.
* - the sort which have more empty units than filled, on a death feedback loop.
** Other than bringing back pointless Covid restrictions if that cold bug makes a come back in the winter.
Not a 1997 type majority though?
Not a 1997 type majority though?
So Labour have a net loss of seats in the West Midlands.
This is the sort of area where they need to gain seats if they want to win the next general election.
There are usually odd locations that buck the overall trend in any given local or General Election, the one below from @nw1 in 2019 is one, but also in 2021 Labour made gains in some South-East councils, as well as Andy Burnham winning re-election as Greater Manchester Mayor by a landslide, while the party put in a dire performance nationally.One small area of the country, going against the national trend, and perhaps explained by the West Midlands mayor being unusually popular for a Tory (see posts above).
One could argue conversely that Labour did well in 2019 because they gained Putney.![]()
I doubt that is an issue in those areas at all.I've been wondering to myself if Labour are going to do more poorly in future in places where there are various large concentrations of religious groups. Religious Groups are more likely to be socially conservative and may care more about 'what a women is' or something along those lines, than other, non religious, people.
Obviously the West Midlands is very ethnically diverse
Labour 8-10% ahead is a very significant lead in share of the vote, and you'd normally expect a party that far ahead to easily win a general election outright, so I'm a bit surprised that John Curtice is only predicting Labour to be the largest party, not to have a majority of MPs.