• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Camp Hill Line, Birmingham

Status
Not open for further replies.

newtownmgr

On Moderation
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
737
Its a political service, it will end up at Kings Norton.
Then potentially shortsighted & might not last long given the dft’s current campaign of managed decline. Which again is political.

The West Midlands route strategy eventually has additional Hereford services with at least half, if not all using Moor St. Honestly can’t see a half hour service using 4 car sets just between New St & Kings Norton only being viable.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

trundlewagon

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Messages
189
Location
Birmingham
A bit disappointing that the plans for the 'rebuild' at Kings Norton are to just stick a bay in the island platform, meaning that will always be the end of the line for Camp Hill services.

If they re-opened the island properly that would've allowed for services to continue to Longbridge (or further) but doing other than the bare minimum just doesn't happen does it.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
A bit disappointing that the plans for the 'rebuild' at Kings Norton are to just stick a bay in the island platform, meaning that will always be the end of the line for Camp Hill services.

If they re-opened the island properly that would've allowed for services to continue to Longbridge (or further) but doing other than the bare minimum just doesn't happen does it.
Depends if you are looking at a bigger picture? If the Midlands Rail Hub kicks off, which puts in the bay, would you need 8tph from New St to Northfield and Longbridge? Kings Norton is a lucky beneficiary as it would get them by default. You would struggle to turn them around if you are back to 3tph Redditch and 3tph Bromsgrove using the turnback siding as well as XC and the extras that MRH is proposing, unless you turn them at Barnt Green as the proposal is to extend the Down Gloucester Goods. Even that wouldn't be easy. Is there a demand from Kings Heath etc to go south? You are always going to have to make trade offs, especially as its a diesel railway service.
 

jhy44

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2008
Messages
202
Location
Marylebone (London)
Was the plan not to route the Birmingham - Herefords via Camp Hill and have them make the stops? Something about there not being enough capacity at New Street for any additional services?

I wasn't aware that this had changed.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Was the plan not to route the Birmingham - Herefords via Camp Hill and have them make the stops? Something about there not being enough capacity at New Street for any additional services?

I wasn't aware that this had changed.
Was never going to happen.
 

Liam L

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2020
Messages
1,421
Location
Birmingham
Cross City will be staying at 4 tph. As regards the Camp Hill services, I’m not 100% certain that it will just be a New St - Kings Norton shuttle as that will not be financially viable, especially in the current climate without a massive subsidy. I suspect that it may involve an additional Worcester service for one of the services. Will be interesting to see what actually happens. At present only Worcester sign the Camp Hill line & only a limited number of New St drivers are being trained on the 196’s. Obviously like everything that can change.
Our Local Mp (Which serves Longbridge and Kings Norton) put something through the letterbox a couple months back that he was campaigning to get the service up towards Longbridge, However I haven't heard anything since and I believe the leaflet was binned sadly so I can't look back over it.
 

Baz2000

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2023
Messages
24
Location
Birmingham
Our Local Mp (Which serves Longbridge and Kings Norton) put something through the letterbox a couple months back that he was campaigning to get the service up towards Longbridge, However I haven't heard anything since and I believe the leaflet was binned sadly so I can't look back over it.
Hi i read about that to, the service going to longbridge, i think it was on the local tv news but it was a while back not !00% what was said at the time, anyway its sounds like a good idea it they do it, i think the idea was to make longbridge an interchange station.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,892
Location
West Country
Our Local Mp (Which serves Longbridge and Kings Norton) put something through the letterbox a couple months back that he was campaigning to get the service up towards Longbridge, However I haven't heard anything since and I believe the leaflet was binned sadly so I can't look back over it.
Using the turnback siding at Longbridge? It doesn’t seem particularly plausible to me as I imagine that would eat the two paths available that allow the Cross-City to return to 6tph in future, plus adding in an additional conflicting move from the up slow to Camp Hill at the west end of Kings Norton (also requiring the reinstatement of the currently out-of-use island platform). That’s just my hunch however based on my limited knowledge of the pathing in that area; someone like The Planner would be better qualified to comment.

As an aside, have any tentative timings been published for the new services yet?
 

Baz2000

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2023
Messages
24
Location
Birmingham
Using the turnback siding at Longbridge? It doesn’t seem particularly plausible to me as I imagine that would eat the two paths available that allow the Cross-City to return to 6tph in future, plus adding in an additional conflicting move from the up slow to Camp Hill at the west end of Kings Norton (also requiring the reinstatement of the currently out-of-use island platform). That’s just my hunch however based on my limited knowledge of the pathing in that area; someone like The Planner would be better qualified to comment.

As an aside, have any tentative timings been published for the new services yet?
HI, i havnt heard of anything yet regarding timing , apart from the service will be 2 trains per hour each way i guess maybe every 30 mins monday to saturday, but nothing as to yet regarding sundays. my guess is it will probably be hourly sundays.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Was the line to Rubery (the remains of the Halesowen branch) lifted?
Donkeys years ago, before the Rover plant closed.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Using the turnback siding at Longbridge? It doesn’t seem particularly plausible to me as I imagine that would eat the two paths available that allow the Cross-City to return to 6tph in future, plus adding in an additional conflicting move from the up slow to Camp Hill at the west end of Kings Norton (also requiring the reinstatement of the currently out-of-use island platform). That’s just my hunch however based on my limited knowledge of the pathing in that area; someone like The Planner would be better qualified to comment.

As an aside, have any tentative timings been published for the new services yet?
You have explained it well enough. You would need a gap between 4tph Cross City plus the XC and the Herefords. I doubt you would find a reliable gap. As for timings, it will sit in the bigger gaps in the cross city schedules.
 

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,137
Depends if you are looking at a bigger picture? If the Midlands Rail Hub kicks off, which puts in the bay, would you need 8tph from New St to Northfield and Longbridge? Kings Norton is a lucky beneficiary as it would get them by default. You would struggle to turn them around if you are back to 3tph Redditch and 3tph Bromsgrove using the turnback siding as well as XC and the extras that MRH is proposing, unless you turn them at Barnt Green as the proposal is to extend the Down Gloucester Goods. Even that wouldn't be easy. Is there a demand from Kings Heath etc to go south? You are always going to have to make trade offs, especially as its a diesel railway service.
Its a real shame they don’t electrify the camp hill lines, especially before they reopen stations on there.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,459
Location
Despond
If they're just sticking a bay in the old island platform at Kings Norton, how is the platform numbering going to work? Will it be 1, 2, 4? Just intrigued given I can understand why the present platforms are numbered one and four but sticking a fifth track in the layout there for the bay makes it a great deal less logical.
Of course, in an ideal world with flowerbeds of money trees, the junction where the local services cross over to the outer tracks could be moved to the Longbridge side of the station, leaving platforms 1 and 2 for Cross-City Line trains, and platforms 3 and 4 for Camp Hill Line trains with no conflicting moves (assuming I've remembered the layout correctly) - but that's impossible, sadly.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,892
Location
West Country
If they're just sticking a bay in the old island platform at Kings Norton, how is the platform numbering going to work? Will it be 1, 2, 4? Just intrigued given I can understand why the present platforms are numbered one and four but sticking a fifth track in the layout there for the bay makes it a great deal less logical.
Of course, in an ideal world with flowerbeds of money trees, the junction where the local services cross over to the outer tracks could be moved to the Longbridge side of the station, leaving platforms 1 and 2 for Cross-City Line trains, and platforms 3 and 4 for Camp Hill Line trains with no conflicting moves (assuming I've remembered the layout correctly) - but that's impossible, sadly.
The trackwork at the west end of the station already allows movements from what would be platform 2 (on the island) onto the down slow towards Northfield, however it's not electrified.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Still a shame, even if there's good reasons for it.
Its only cleared for W7 freight and is also wonky like Old Hill where its worse in the up direction I believe.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The trackwork at the west end of the station already allows movements from what would be platform 2 (on the island) onto the down slow towards Northfield, however it's not electrified.
It would be as part of this, as will all the fast lines down to Barnt Green.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,524
Location
Northampton
Its only cleared for W7 freight and is also wonky like Old Hill where its worse in the up direction I believe.
Good reasons, but it's still a shame for a suburban line operating at 2tph or higher not to be electrified. How much container traffic is there coming up from the Severn through Birmingham that could go onto trains if Camp Hill was clear through to the Derby lines?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Good reasons, but it's still a shame for a suburban line operating at 2tph or higher not to be electrified. How much container traffic is there coming up from the Severn through Birmingham that could go onto trains if Camp Hill was clear through to the Derby lines?
Probably not a lot, you have the Daventry Wentloog traffic. You could possibly divert Felixstowe traffic that way if there is a block on.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,423
I don't know the area (well, I know the Cross-City route, but not Camp Hill). However, would a short-distance suburban shuttle on a half-hourly frequency like this pay its way, so to speak, and does it have good enough social justification for existence (like some less-profitable rural lines do)? Does it offer significant advantages to local buses? Are a lot of people in this area likely to commute to Wolverhampton, Coventry etc (which I can see would be a good justification as this sort of distance is arguably better done by train) or travel to more distant places such as London or Manchester (likewise)?

Not saying it wouldn't, and I'm certainly not against reopening - just questioning why the service pattern isn't integrated into something from further south such as the Hereford service.

Are there any long-term plans e.g. electrification and diverting some Cross-City services that way?
 
Last edited:

Fidelis

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2020
Messages
86
Location
Worcester
I don't know the area (well, I know the Cross-City route, but not Camp Hill). However, would a short-distance suburban shuttle on a half-hourly frequency like this pay its way, so to speak, and does it have good enough social justification for existence (like some less-profitable rural lines do)? Does it offer significant advantages to local buses? Are a lot of people in this area likely to commute to Wolverhampton, Coventry etc (which I can see would be a good justification as this sort of distance is arguably better done by train) or travel to more distant places such as London or Manchester (likewise)?

Not saying it wouldn't, and I'm certainly not against reopening - just questioning why the service pattern isn't integrated into something from further south such as the Hereford service.

Are there any long-term plans e.g. electrification and diverting some Cross-City services that way?
I have the same reservations on how profitable this service will be.
However the A435 running past these stations is notoriously jammed with traffic throughout the day and the journey time by train will be significantly quicker, quoted in the initial 2018 proposal at 15 minutes compared to 30 by bus.
The Midlands Rail Hub proposals include a service from Moor Street to Hereford along the Camphill Line, but probably will not include stops until Bromsgrove.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
As part of the Camp Hill improvements? Certainly a positive development regardless.
No, as part of Midlands Rail hub. The Camp Hill stations are clearly an Andy Street thing.
Of course they could always drop the track & do some modifications to the tunnel as they have done on other lines.
What is going to use it? diversions don't count.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I have the same reservations on how profitable this service will be.
However the A435 running past these stations is notoriously jammed with traffic throughout the day and the journey time by train will be significantly quicker, quoted in the initial 2018 proposal at 15 minutes compared to 30 by bus.
The Midlands Rail Hub proposals include a service from Moor Street to Hereford along the Camphill Line, but probably will not include stops until Bromsgrove.
How often are the buses? Travel West Midlands seems to show a shed load to and from Kings Heath etc?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,524
Location
Northampton
What is going to use it? diversions don't count.
2tph suburban stopper, if you extend the electrification to Nuneaton you'd also have potential for Birmingham/South Wales freight to put electrics on at Bromsgrove for runs up the Lickey and onto Daventry. not really a case on it's own but at the same time we really need to be building something otherwise we end up in the present stagnant mess.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
2tph suburban stopper, if you extend the electrification to Nuneaton you'd also have potential for Birmingham/South Wales freight to put electrics on at Bromsgrove for runs up the Lickey and onto Daventry. not really a case on it's own but at the same time we really need to be building something otherwise we end up in the present stagnant mess.
It would start to stack up more if Bromsgrove to Westerleigh was a serious proposition, but as it is I don't see it. There isn't enough freight that would use it. You would still have Herefords on diesel.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,524
Location
Northampton
It would start to stack up more if Bromsgrove to Westerleigh was a serious proposition, but as it is I don't see it. There isn't enough freight that would use it. You would still have Herefords on diesel.
And that's part of the issue. A-B, B-C, and C-D don't stack up on their own, and A-D is unaffordable as a single project even. Although passing up the opportunity to get WMT bi-modes is maddening, as that would make piecemeal electrification a far more worthwhile project. As it is I agree with you, it will need something like Swindon-Gloucester/Cheltenham to come first to make Bromsgrove-Westerleigh worthwhile, and as you'll need 88s, 93s or 99s anyway in the meantime there's no rush to get Camp hill done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top