I thought there was more than that. 3 each way at least, I'm sure.
Sorry, you are right! There are three, the 1556, 1721 and the 1935 to London. Plus the 1316, 1514 and 1721 to Carmarthen.
Still not much use for a trip to Swansea though!
I thought there was more than that. 3 each way at least, I'm sure.
Good point!To get out of Llanelli![]()
No, ASLEF have banned all non-contractual overtme, including Sunday and Restday working.
It is industrial action. They are official sanctions, authorised by ASLEF.
Can anyone confirm that ATW are nit working this Saturday (12th)? It said yes on the BBC, but I have spoken to ATW staff who say it is not confirmed yet.
No worries Bob, here is a link to the article on the ASLEF website:
http://www.aslef.org.uk/information/100012/100039/122407/arriva_trains_wales_strikes_announced/
Can anyone confirm that ATW are nit working this Saturday (12th)? It said yes on the BBC, but I have spoken to ATW staff who say it is not confirmed yet.
Current word is that the strike and ALL work to rule is off pending talks a week tomorrow. Apparently ATW have something new to discuss and ASLEF have called off the action as an act of good faith whilst waiting for this 'news.'
The thing is, aslef has handled this whole thing terribly. There is ATW on one side giving great spin with the 12% malarky.... 'we cant offer any more' etc. Aslef know full well their members are more than willing to take considerably less, but to keep conditions, so why arent they going into more details to the press.
I see where you're coming from, but I have to say: just because the media haven't published ASLEF's 'more details' doesn't mean they haven't been given it. Take the RMT's excellent press release which came out a few days ago, breaking down exactly what the problems are. How many newspapers have you seen that published in?
My point is: I don't think it makes the slightest difference what union is involved, there is a distinct anti-union bias in most of the media which means they will always publish the company stance in full and the union stance in brief, using selective quoting. Which then makes members feel they are not being represented properly. I have no doubt there is room for improvement, but in this country, in this economic climate, the press just are not going to publish the union 'propaganda'. Only have to look at the Royal Mail and BA strikes to see that - I bet their workers had a similar feeling.
To get out of Llanelli![]()
Yes, true. I did think that maybe the media put their own bias across. If thats the case, maybe aslef shouldnt talk to the press at all, unless they can be assured they will put both arguments across. The press would soon change their tune I think if they are not getting a story due to their selective editing.
As for the difference in what union is involved. At least RMT have a backbone. They only withdrew the last six nations strike because they knew they would lose the high court battle, not because they were due to talk next week.
I'm telling you, there must be something going on. Drivers were on the verge of getting a fair 'no Sundays' deal had aslef stood their ground.
For some reason aslef want ATW drivers to have a commitment to Sundays. Its not the subscriptions, as committed sundays require no extra drivers, but even if it was...... how bad is that. This whole thing stinks.
Aslef vs ATW are right back to square one now. People have striked, passengers have been inconvenienced, for nothing.
These latest developments, while seem good for the average public, they are not. If aslef stood strong, the dispute would have been settled this week. As it is, it is far more likely that this dispute will be ongoing, with further strikes proposed and more disruption.
It is ironic, but the worst thing aslef could do for the general public is to back down on the six nations strike, and they have done just that.
I heard they've go eelctric light in Swansea now, wanted to see if its true!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Not talking to the media at all would be even worse than the media not putting the union message across correctly.
The stirke being caleld off is a good thing. No one will lose any pay, and no passengers will be inconvenienced. Perhaps the strike was in danger of weakening?
I am confident that the issues can now be resolved without the need for any further action.
Still ATW could take the whole offer off the table and spend the £2 million plus on something else. Leasing more trains or recruiting more staff. To put the offer in perspective the sum is equivalent to leasing every year another eight Class 158's or recruiting 100 extra Platform staff.
ATW spend in excess of £30 million per annum on Drivers salary's alone on a income of £225 million.
True. But why would you want to go to Swansea on a Sunday?![]()

There was mention of it, but the Chapel soon put a stop to the idea.There is a rumour going around that Swansea may be screening talking pictures at the Cinema on Sundays.![]()
There was mention of it, but the Chapel soon put a stop to the idea.![]()
Wonder if my friend Greenback as seen talkies yet,Dunno where you get that from, we have 650 odd drivers at the mo so 650 multiplied by 34 grand is 22million
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
To be honest im shocked at some of the pro RMT comments on here. The last strike they did was a disaster from start to finish, the picket line wasn't fully manned at all hours so as a result aslef drivers didnt have an excuse not to come in. They balloted members who had left and gone to aslef so had retired and have not re-balloted or done anything meaningful since the aborted strike day. The general consensus between the drivers is one of disapointment at the moment, if obviously the aslef deal is good then its a load of hot air but aslef are doing themselves no favours by not publishing whats been discussed. it's just fostering ill feeling towards the union.
So now you have balanced the books by giving a anti RMT stance.