HSTEd
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 20,342
They'll send a man with a van to turn your power off for a few hours a day?If you don't have a smart meter they'll send a bloke in a van round instead.
That's not going to be very practical.
They'll send a man with a van to turn your power off for a few hours a day?If you don't have a smart meter they'll send a bloke in a van round instead.
They'll send a man with a van to turn your power off for a few hours a day?
That's not going to be very practical.
As a matter of interest, which app do you use for this? I can view data through my supplier's own app, but it's not great.I had to ask for ages to get a smart meter for electric and it took even longer for gas.
Thankfully I got both eventually and now I share my data with an app that gives me (near) real time monitoring with loads of useful stats - and it even tells me exactly what I'd pay if I had solar/home battery based on the electricity usage time, and how many panels I say that I want to have (and I can change that in real time to see the difference).
It is why I am very keen to invest in some panels and a battery in the future - as on many days I could get over 70% of my electricity off grid.
Anyway, for me there's no conspiracy and only benefits for me in that I can monitor phantom loads and anything out of the ordinary.
In the future, any variable tariff or discounts can be managed more effectively by the meter with more options available.
The free display I got is useful as a running total on the day, but apps can do so much more - and you won't need the display.
Turning the power off to one house would have no effect on reducing load. You would need to do it over wider areas. Rather than switching off individual meters it would be easier to do it at the substations which have suitable switchgear and in many cases these days fitted with a SCADA system.They'll send a man with a van to turn your power off for a few hours a day?
That's not going to be very practical.
That would require you to cut off everyone in the circuit.Turning the power off to one house would have no effect on reducing load. You would need to do it over wider areas. Rather than switching off individual meters it would be easier to do it at the substations which have suitable switchgear and in many cases these days fitted with a SCADA system.
Why don't they just get us to switch of the power ourselves by controlling us using the Covid vaccine nanites and the 5G death beams? That would be more politically palatable.That would require you to cut off everyone in the circuit.
Using the smart meter system you could, for example, cut off most people but leave the "most vulnerable" (selected ofcourse based on voter demographics) with their power on.
Doing that is much more politically palatable and with smart meters in every home, little more difficult.
That would require you to cut off everyone in the circuit.
Using the smart meter system you could, for example, cut off most people but leave the "most vulnerable" (selected ofcourse based on voter demographics) with their power on.
Doing that is much more politically palatable and with smart meters in every home, little more difficult.
In the rather energy wasteful US of A there are widespread schemes where a load control is wired in to interrupt power to their AC systems. These operate on both a radio controlled and preset delay modes in case of power outages. Customers of course obtain varying discounts.This is serious tinfoil hattery of the highest order.
What is proposed long term is that some appliances may be designed to accept a signal asking them to shut down if things are getting tight. An example would be a freezer, which you could unplug overnight without food wastage provided you didn't open the door. But so far as I am aware there are as yet no such appliances in existence.
Suggesting you shouldn't get a smart meter for those reasons is absolutely crazy. If this was what they wanted to do, they could mandate no electricity without fitment of a smart meter.That would require you to cut off everyone in the circuit.
Using the smart meter system you could, for example, cut off most people but leave the "most vulnerable" (selected ofcourse based on voter demographics) with their power on.
Doing that is much more politically palatable and with smart meters in every home, little more difficult.
I think I've established in my own mind (after reading many websites of power companies, government bodies, CAB etc) what may occur in the future after non-smart meters will no longer be available for fitment. Smart meters with the 'smart' function disabled/turned off will be supplied, but no realtime data will be going to the electricity company. In other words, it will just sit there requiring to be read in the time-honoured way, and may solve the problem in high rise flats etc. Whether it makes the smart meter less likely to start a fire I don't know: personally, that's a lot of the reason why I'm reluctant to accept one, as a fire in that location would be very likely to take me with it.Suggesting you shouldn't get a smart meter for those reasons is absolutely crazy. If this was what they wanted to do, they could mandate no electricity without fitment of a smart meter.
What have smart meters got to do with starting fires? And how does a high rise flat make any difference to the meter? Either the meters are all in the basement or in the individual flats at with the fuseboard. Sounds like your reading the wrong kind of websites.Whether it makes the smart meter less likely to start a fire I don't know: personally, that's a lot of the reason why I'm reluctant to accept one, as a fire in that location would be very likely to take me with it.
I think I've established in my own mind (after reading many websites of power companies, government bodies, CAB etc) what may occur in the future after non-smart meters will no longer be available for fitment. Smart meters with the 'smart' function disabled/turned off will be supplied, but no realtime data will be going to the electricity company. In other words, it will just sit there requiring to be read in the time-honoured way, and may solve the problem in high rise flats etc. Whether it makes the smart meter less likely to start a fire I don't know: personally, that's a lot of the reason why I'm reluctant to accept one, as a fire in that location would be very likely to take me with it.
This is the second time such a ridiculous proposal has been made in this thread. My "100% renewable" tariffs have increased in price along with others, reflecting the increase in gas costs. If you want to disconnect me when there is no renewable energy being generated, give me a much cheaper rate!I'd also like to see a 'true renewable' tariff where consumers are disconnected when no renewable electricity is being generated.
Anything "smart" must be good, right?
So a smart meter must be a good idea. But then we have smart motorways...
I don't have a smart meter and I've never been offered one, neither have I asked for one. I just read my meter once a month, when British Gas ask and I enter the numbers on their website.Anything "smart" must be good, right?
So a smart meter must be a good idea. But then we have smart motorways...
There are credible reports. What is less clear is whether the problem is the meters themselves, or dodgy installations. When you are drawing 40/60/100A, all the connections need to be good. There are at least four connections to get right. It only takes one poor connection.I've heard a lot of conspiracy theories about smart meters, but never one involving them catching fire.
There are credible reports. What is less clear is whether the problem is the meters themselves, or dodgy installations. When you are drawing 40/60/100A, all the connections need to be good. There are at least four connections to get right. It only takes one poor connection.
I thought the smart meters were supposed to help us Monitor our energy use.
We can’t even read ours. The old meter had clear numbers that could be read by standing below it but on the smart meter the display is very small and flashes so cannot be read - the meter is above the front door by the ceiling.
So we now have no idea how much electricity we are using until we get the bill through the post.
I didn't mention cutting anybody off, that's your imagined scenario. Pricing based on actual availability of energy is inevitable to ensure that irresponsible use of resources is rewarded with higher costs. When consumers consider others needs they be rewarded with lower prices.Well when the Government inevitably reneges on the "promise" that the remote cut off will never be used to punish people for bill arrears or to ensure that brownouts do not impact the "most vulnerable" - which will obviously be selected to include their chosen voter base.
Or the capability to impose 24 hour continuous time of use charging on the peasantry to rescue the Government from the bad publicity of its insane energy policy.
But my comment was in respect of those who thought that they might be exempted from smart metering because of difficulties in a GSM data channel. There are other methods to deal with them, which may be more costly but if rolled out would likely only be incrementally moreso, compared with the overall benefit of universal smart metering.Power Line Signalling is used extensively for this purpose in France - but obviously the Government went with the radio solution because it was the cheapest, even though it can't reach a significant fraction of metering points
No we didn’t get any display.