• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Signalling staff shortages at Paddington

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrmartin

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,296
This has been going on for weeks and apparently will continue for months. They are about 10 signallers short at TVSC. Will take ages to train that many people n the routes they need to know.
Absolutely crazy that left being short ~10 staff (total cost of £1-2million a year with NI, benefits etc taken into account) is shutting down one of Europe's busiest railways, that was recently upgraded at the cost of £billions and probably ruining trips for tens/hundreds of thousands of ppl. Absolutely ridiculous.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,581
I'm surprised NR approved the tfl rail extension to Heathrow if they are 10 signallers short that apparently required the Heathrow branch to have a dedicated signaller
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,043
Absolutely crazy that left being short ~10 staff (total cost of £1-2million a year with NI, benefits etc taken into account) is shutting down one of Europe's busiest railways, that was recently upgraded at the cost of £billions and probably ruining trips for tens/hundreds of thousands of ppl. Absolutely ridiculous.

Fairly easy to get a high number of vacancies.
The notice period is 4 weeks plus a week for each year of service. My guess is that for a grade 9 the training for a replacement off the street will be a year or so, plus the recruitment process itself.
There's a training backlog in many areas following nearly 2 years of covid hysteria, a reluctance of many existing signallers to train up new people, and other issues like the fact that TVSC recruited a number of people from the airline industry when covid kicked off and many have returned now that the airline industry is quickly recovering. Add to that the current industrial relations issues and you can see why some areas are struggling.
 

t_packer

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2017
Messages
18
That’s really i
This has been going on since Covid sporadically but is very acute right now. Most days there are not enough staff in TVSC for Link 1 (Paddington - West Drayton), Link 2 (Slough - Reading) or Link 3 (Newbury / Didcot / Oxford) [feel free to correct the link locations]. Normally there’s no meal break available which means 30 minute closure all at once than different desks shutting 30 mins at a time. The preferred times on nights are 0200-0230 but occasionally it’s 2200-2230 and in the day it’s usually around 1000-1030 but obviously there’s no ideal time and in the day that sort of closure will knock on for ~2 hours and trains are cancelled / held down the line in a platform or terminated short.

They are desperately short or signallers this is due to sickness, vacancies (both ongoing and repeat due to people starting and leaving); they’re looking for Grade 7/8/9 signallers right now which correspond to Link 3/2/1 respectively I believe).

I believe it is being explained by “a shortage of signalling staff” but obviously on board it might be more sporadic - no doubt because if the driver hasn’t been informed beforehand there’s no signaller to call to ask why delayed! There’s only so much GWR/TfL Rail can do other than plan for the disruption.

Thanks for your explanation, it’s really interesting and it’s amazing how some detail makes the whole thing feel a (little) less frustrating. I guess that’s all I’m asking of GWR/TfL Rail. Acknowledge that it’s a recurring problem, that they know it’s inconvenient, and what they’re doing about it.

There’s more disruption tonight due to a “broken rail(?)” turning my usual turn-up-and-go commute out of Paddington into a long wait nightmare again…
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
3,035
Location
81D & 81E
I guess that’s all I’m asking of GWR/TfL Rail. Acknowledge that it’s a recurring problem, that they know it’s inconvenient, and what they’re doing about it.

I think you need to be asking that question to Network Rail, they employ the Signallers. There’s not a lot GWR/TfL can do about it.
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
3,014
Location
UK
MTR must be pissed they get fined £10000-£50000 per cancellation regardless of reason
Even if it's due to infrastructure issues that they cannot conceivably have any control over whatsoever?! o_O

If they signed up to that then it would seem a reasonable price for foolishness!
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,581
Even if it's due to infrastructure issues that they cannot conceivably have any control over whatsoever?! o_O

If they signed up to that then it would seem a reasonable price for foolishness!

Yes although they will only pay 10% of the fine which is £1000-£3600 per cancellation 10% of the baseline figure.
 

t_packer

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2017
Messages
18
I think you need to be asking that question to Network Rail, they employ the Signallers. There’s not a lot GWR/TfL can do about it.
I guess GWR/TfL Rail still have an obligation to inform passengers, even if they’re not to blame. But point taken, I shall lay my frustrations at the door of Network Rail! I guess this is another example of the longstanding need to have one body which is responsible for the railway and accountable to passengers. Though there’s always going to be TfL/National Rail crossover.
 

Craig1122

Member
Joined
14 May 2021
Messages
374
Location
UK
I've known (and at times offered) enhancements over and above the official rate for the job in every role I've done where there's an absolute requirement for a 'bum on a seat'.

That's both inside and outside the railway so have no difficulty believing it goes on. Most people will keep what they've been given quiet so as not to upset others so there's the scope for amounts to get exaggerated on the rumour mill.
 

TFN

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2017
Messages
464
Location
London
I saw a poster at Heathrow Central from TfL about this issue (around Easter).

I'm not sure about other stations but the publicity really should be better from TfL, GWR, NR and HEX.

771B1086-59A4-4E60-9F51-AFC12DDA4B93.jpeg
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,199
They can also now train themselves up on the recently released Slough Simulation :D [/plug]

Im still trying to get to grips with Swin-Did.

”I’m qualified but can we run the 2004 summer timetable please as that’s all I know?” :D:lol:
 
Joined
9 Jan 2012
Messages
24
This is still an issue. I’m currently sitting at Paddington on 1C37, the 22:32 for Bristol, but we’ve been told it’s not going to leave until after 23:00 due to a lack of signallers, and nor is anything else.

A look at the open train times signalling map does indeed show every single train at a stand between Paddington and Reading. Seems quite a remarkable issue to have to deal with on such a major main line!

Can anyone with inside knowledge give an indication of how long it might take to resolve this staffing issue? I appreciate it takes months (years?) to train new signallers but even a “not before [date]” would be interesting to know.
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,664
Can anyone with inside knowledge give an indication of how long it might take to resolve this staffing issue? I appreciate it takes months (years?) to train new signallers but even a “not before [date]” would be interesting to know.
When the dispute between the RMT and NR (or perhaps more appropriately the DfT / Treasury) is resolved which I doubt will be quick.
 

Basil Jet

On Moderation
Joined
23 Apr 2022
Messages
1,090
Location
London
On Saturday night nothing was moving in or out of Paddington for some time, due to "lack of staff". Including the newly renamed Elizabeth Line (west).
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,474
Location
London
Logic presumably being that a full closure for 30 minutes is less worse than spreading it out across several hours by closing one or two workstations at a time.
 
Joined
9 Jan 2012
Messages
24
When the dispute between the RMT and NR (or perhaps more appropriately the DfT / Treasury) is resolved which I doubt will be quick.
Do feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but I was under the impression that the problem here is due to a large number of vacancies and higher than normal staff absence at TVSC, rather than industrial action that might arise from RMTs current ballot.

Is there already a work to rule taking place at TVSC? Or is there less willingness to volunteer for rest day working as a result of industrial bad feeling? Presumably the dispute doesn’t prevent NR from recruiting and training new staff, or does it?

It does however give a small glimpse of the torrid time we might have if signallers imposed a work to rule across the country. It would cripple the network.
 

Class 170101

On Moderation
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,664
Do feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but I was under the impression that the problem here is due to a large number of vacancies and higher than normal staff absence at TVSC, rather than industrial action that might arise from RMTs current ballot.
Currently not related to the industrial action - at least officially. However the second and third paragraphs below would be suggestive.
Is there already a work to rule taking place at TVSC? Or is there less willingness to volunteer for rest day working as a result of industrial bad feeling? Presumably the dispute doesn’t prevent NR from recruiting and training new staff, or does it?

It does however give a small glimpse of the torrid time we might have if signallers imposed a work to rule across the country. It would cripple the network.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top