Surely the consultation on the upcoming timetable was evidence that cuts are being considered? When it talks about seats being empty 77% of the time there’s a clear narrative of over-provision that needs trimming.Given the SG investment, and even UKG investment in Rail, at this time its difficult to find evidence to support the theory that anyone wants to see cuts to the rail network.
There are absolutely ongoing discussions around cost, subsidy, public patronage etc, but I dont think we are quite at the stage where cuts are being actively promoted or pursued.