• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Scotland not keen on GBR

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,692
Location
Hope Valley
Have the individual TOCs absorbed into GBR all been amalgamated into one party in ORCATS yet? It would mean an awful lot less "clearing".
This sort of comment always misses the point that ORCATS was developed by BR for 'Allocation of Tickets to Services' well before privatisation.

Otherwise you just end up with GBR sitting in front of a multi-billion-£££ cash 'lake' without the faintest idea of how much was earned by the ECML, Whitby branch, Island Line, Hallam Line, etc.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
4,289
Other wise you just end up with GBR sitting in front of a multi-billion-£££ cash 'lake' without the faintest idea of how much was earned by the ECML, Whitby branch, Island Line, Hallam Line, etc.
They know what tickets have been sold, and always have done. That won't be changing.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,692
Location
Hope Valley
They know what tickets have been sold, and always have done. That won't be changing.
I am well aware of that. But that is not the same as having a good idea of which services are being used (by route, time of day and so on). As a former BR Service Group Manager I can assure you that the extra detail provided by ORCATS was always extremely valuable. Obviously it is complemented by other revenue management and business planning tools as it was by things like CAPRI and MOIRA in BR days.
 

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,884
Location
Central Scotland
I don't think it was intended to be an exhaustive list? Otherwise Lockerbie, Dunbar, Motherwell etc etc needed to be mentioned, and also even Bridge of Allan, Dunkeld & Birnam and Carrbridge with their weekly stops.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


What does Dumfries have to do with anything? It was never served by Northern.
Stirling is however an LNER terminus. The others are not.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,010
Location
London
If they're "not keen", then why did so many Scottish cities want to become the HQ?! - https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2022/03/42-towns-and-cities-bid-to-host-great-british-railways-hq.html

The list of submissions are Barrow in Furness, Birmingham, Bishops Stortford, Bolton, Camborne, Carlisle, Carnforth, Coventry, Crewe, Darlington, Derby, Didcot, Doncaster, Dundee, Durham, Eastleigh, Edinburgh ,Fife, Gloucester, Grantham, Greater Manchester, Heywood, Hull, Liverpool, Milton Keynes, Motherwell, Newcastle, Northampton, Nuneaton, Perth, Peterborough, Preston (Lancs), Southampton, Stockton-on-Tees, Swindon, Tamworth, Tonbridge, Wakefield, Wellingborough, West of England combined authority (including Bristol and Bath), Worcester, York
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,586
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
I would be most surprised if a Scottish location is chosen for GBR's HQ, as apart from being remote from the majority of UK rail operations, what would happen in the event of Scottish independence - The whole thing would surely have to be relocated !
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,010
Location
London
I would be most surprised if a Scottish location is chosen for GBR's HQ, as apart from being remote from the majority of UK rail operations, what would happen in the event of Scottish independence - The whole thing would surely have to be relocated !

Yes I find it quite unlikely, just found it interesting that Sturgeon was apparently 'speaking for Scotland' when evidently a fair few cities and towns have no doubt hyped up their credentials and lauded praise on GBR in their bids. I am of course evidently aware of the differences between national governments and local government priorities and desires, it just amused me a little.
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
If they're "not keen", then why did so many Scottish cities want to become the HQ?! - https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2022/03/42-towns-and-cities-bid-to-host-great-british-railways-hq.html

Whoever the author was, they have made an error regarding geography of one of the places in Scotland.

Fife is not a town or city, but a former Kingdom of which Dunfermline once served as the capital of the whole of Scotland, most towns having a KY postcode (centred around Kirkcaldy - Newport on Tay has a DD postcode centred around Dundee). Fife Regional Council and the present day Fife Council has its administrative headquarters in the New Town of Glenrothes (established 1948 - the second in Scotland after East Kilbride in 1947, and before Cumbernauld in 1955).

With sloppiness in standards of journalism when it comes to matters relating to Scotland, I can understand that it is no wonder that locals get ratty especially if the reporter has not bothered to take the time or effort to read up on some brief background info.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,010
Location
London
Whoever the author was, they have made an error regarding geography of one of the places in Scotland.

Fife is not a town or city, but a former Kingdom of which Dunfermline once served as the capital of the whole of Scotland, most towns having a KY postcode (centred around Kirkcaldy - Newport on Tay has a DD postcode centred around Dundee). Fife Regional Council and the present day Fife Council has its administrative headquarters in the New Town of Glenrothes (established 1948 - the second in Scotland after East Kilbride in 1947, and before Cumbernauld in 1955).

With sloppiness in standards of journalism when it comes to matters relating to Scotland, I can understand that it is no wonder that locals get ratty especially if the reporter has not bothered to take the time or effort to read up on some brief background info.

I think Fife is a generalised bid, like West of England.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,515
, what would happen in the event of Scottish independence
Nobody knows unless another referendum’s agreed, so unlikely to affect any location decision given any coloured UK government’s desire to preserve the Union unless a 2nd votes lost .
 
Last edited:

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,431
Sadly I think that the Telegraph will always make time to have a go at the Scottish or Welsh governments.
Indeed, how dare they have the temerity to not vote for Johnson's acolytes.....
 

thedbdiboy

Established Member
Joined
10 Sep 2011
Messages
1,210
This sort of comment always misses the point that ORCATS was developed by BR for 'Allocation of Tickets to Services' well before privatisation.

Otherwise you just end up with GBR sitting in front of a multi-billion-£££ cash 'lake' without the faintest idea of how much was earned by the ECML, Whitby branch, Island Line, Hallam Line, etc.

I am well aware of that. But that is not the same as having a good idea of which services are being used (by route, time of day and so on). As a former BR Service Group Manager I can assure you that the extra detail provided by ORCATS was always extremely valuable. Obviously it is complemented by other revenue management and business planning tools as it was by things like CAPRI and MOIRA in BR days.
One of the opportunities within GBR is to develop a much more sophisticated and up to date management information process. ORCATS was great in its time but is unbelievably crude nowadays in a world with Google Analytics, Amazon Web Services etc. Unfortunately, because franchise bids were all predicated on it, there has been no interest in pursuing the 'truth' because of the financial risk to some if it deviated from the ORCATS 'truth'. That issue is now dead, so at last we can focus on better data and insight without some TOC objecting because they will lose money.
 

U-Bahnfreund

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2015
Messages
559
Location
Germany
There are international trains all over Europe and were even before the EU - it's not hard and it's not an issue.
Wouldn't quite be that optimistic, there are plenty of examples where international trains (both local and longer-distance ones) actually don't work well at all. They only do when the respective governments and rail companies involved take the effort and work together in good faith.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
5,692
Location
Hope Valley
One of the opportunities within GBR is to develop a much more sophisticated and up to date management information process. ORCATS was great in its time but is unbelievably crude nowadays in a world with Google Analytics, Amazon Web Services etc. Unfortunately, because franchise bids were all predicated on it, there has been no interest in pursuing the 'truth' because of the financial risk to some if it deviated from the ORCATS 'truth'. That issue is now dead, so at last we can focus on better data and insight without some TOC objecting because they will lose money.
I entirely agree that, 30 years on, ORCATS can no doubt be superseded by even more sophisticated revenue analysis software and so on within GBR.

However, as with 'fares simplification', just don't expect it to be quick, cheaper, involve fewer staff, etc. Any sustainable business in a competitive environment has to understand where its revenue is being earned (and not earned).
 

MattRat

On Moderation
Joined
26 May 2021
Messages
2,128
Location
Liverpool
One of the opportunities within GBR is to develop a much more sophisticated and up to date management information process. ORCATS was great in its time but is unbelievably crude nowadays in a world with Google Analytics, Amazon Web Services etc. Unfortunately, because franchise bids were all predicated on it, there has been no interest in pursuing the 'truth' because of the financial risk to some if it deviated from the ORCATS 'truth'. That issue is now dead, so at last we can focus on better data and insight without some TOC objecting because they will lose money.
I entirely agree that, 30 years on, ORCATS can no doubt be superseded by even more sophisticated revenue analysis software and so on within GBR.

However, as with 'fares simplification', just don't expect it to be quick, cheaper, involve fewer staff, etc. Any sustainable business in a competitive environment has to understand where its revenue is being earned (and not earned).
I worry that in an effort to create something advanced, we'll end up with something that doesn't work. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

thedbdiboy

Established Member
Joined
10 Sep 2011
Messages
1,210
I worry that in an effort to create something advanced, we'll end up with something that doesn't work. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
It doesn't have to be advanced, just equivalent to the standard of management information that is routinely expected in a transport/logistics environment in 2022
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,658
Location
Dundee
Nobody knows unless another referendum’s agreed, so unlikely to affect any location decision given any coloured UK government’s desire to preserve the Union unless a 2nd votes lost .
Quite, and I reckon that increases the chance of the HQ ending up in Scotland. Commitment to the strength of the Union or such like.
 
Joined
6 Jan 2018
Messages
139
Location
Carluke
Also, better tell the Foreign Office that their massive office at East Kilbride may be moving!

There are loads of UK Government offices in Scotland, all of which would require moving in the event of independence, and some of them are relatively new. It’s frankly a ridiculous argument against a Scottish GBR HQ.

Even so, we all know it will be a northern English city. Got to keep the blue wall sweet.
 

Berliner

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2020
Messages
399
Location
Edinburgh
I am not sure why GBR would be based in Scotland when the overwhelming majority of its network, responsibilities, jurisdiction, and services are in England. It would be like putting Scotrail HQ in Carlisle. In any event, I also highly doubt putting the head office of what, in all honesty, should be called Rail England (or something to that effect) is going to change hearts or minds on either side of the independence debate.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,308
Location
Bolton
Also, better tell the Foreign Office that their massive office at East Kilbride may be moving!

There are loads of UK Government offices in Scotland, all of which would require moving in the event of independence, and some of them are relatively new. It’s frankly a ridiculous argument against a Scottish GBR HQ.

Even so, we all know it will be a northern English city. Got to keep the blue wall sweet.
Foreign policy isn't devolved to Scotland though. Passenger rail services however is indeed a devolved policy area.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,013
Location
here to eternity
This thread has run its course.

For discussion as to where you think the new GBR HQ should be please use this thread:


thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top