• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine Industrial Relations

Status
Not open for further replies.

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
It is. But they all seemed to be fine doing it 3 months ago!

Overtime is often based on goodwill. If a company treats their staff poorly then goodwill evaporates.

There was a lot of goodwill around during covid. Many people came to work and did a little extra because they understood the importance of keeping the railway running. When you are constantly belittled by the very people you came to work to help then again, good will dries up.

Overtime is also decided on circumstance. 3 months ago I was out working hard. A little burned out tbh and now I'm taking a back seat and enjoying football weekends away.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,666
Overtime is often based on goodwill. If a company treats their staff poorly then goodwill evaporates.

There was a lot of goodwill around during covid. Many people came to work and did a little extra because they understood the importance of keeping the railway running. When you are constantly belittled by the very people you came to work to help then again, good will dries up.

Overtime is also decided on circumstance. 3 months ago I was out working hard. A little burned out tbh and now I'm taking a back seat and enjoying football weekends away.
But that is during normal times which I understand. But everyone not doing any isn't the same because we also hear of people kicking off about not having any overtime and losing money...

Ultimately it boils down to the industry should have zero overtime, it should be avaliable only to cover exceptional circumstances and high levels of sickness. Which I appreciate is nothing to do with the drivers, or to be honest the TOCs anymore. It isn't even the DfT it's the treasury.

Like I say my views are strong because whatever is going on at the moment, it isn't TPE managers who are suffering. It's people who commute and my commute is currently a nightmare, so much so I've changed my job.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,867
Location
East Anglia
Drivers aren't working rest days as there is no agreement in place between company and union.
Aslef stance is that company haven't approached them to discuss it so don't expect things to change anytime soon.
Nothing about it in the ASLEF journals either. Used to announce whenever a RDW agreement had been sanctioned with each TOC so been expecting to see something about the reason for not renewing.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
Ultimately it boils down to the industry should have zero overtime, it should be avaliable only to cover exceptional circumstances and high levels of sickness.

Tell that to the TOCs They see it differently.

Like I say my views are strong because whatever is going on at the moment, it isn't TPE managers who are suffering. It's people who commute and my commute is currently a nightmare, so much so I've changed my job.


Yes the railway is very important to those who use it. I'd say it's pretty Key to everyone....

So why don't we support it instead of continually bashing it. Tickets prices are propped up from the very subsidy people moan about.

The staff everyone likes to bash are critical to the day to day running.

The doesn't need or want a fight and nobody should automatically get whatever they demand but the constant knives out dialogue is detrimental to the industry overall. Those who seem to revel in the fight or froth at the mouth when the union says anything are ruining the industry. Strikes and cancellations cost everyone. Working together is the way forward.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,666
Tell that to the TOCs They see it differently.




Yes the railway is very important to those who use it. I'd say it's pretty Key to everyone....

So why don't we support it instead of continually bashing it. Tickets prices are propped up from the very subsidy people moan about.

The staff everyone likes to bash are critical to the day to day running.

The doesn't need or want a fight and nobody should automatically get whatever they demand but the constant knives out dialogue is detrimental to the industry overall. Those who seem to revel in the fight or froth at the mouth when the union says anything are ruining the industry. Strikes and cancellations cost everyone. Working together is the way forward.
You are of course right. However all sides have the knives out and until that stops and unions and companies alike stop aggravating people intentionally the industry will continue to be unable to present a united front and will continue to be unattractive for any real investment.

Maybe I've fallen for the divide and conquer, hook line and sinker. Maybe I just woke up on the wrong side of the bed, or maybe I just need a pint
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
Teacher here. My annual pay rise last September was zero (and unless the Government changes things it will be zero this September as well).

My pay has dropped 7% in real terms since 2010. If you include the changes to pension contributions that rises to 10%.
Exactly. Many of those working on the railway don't know how lucky they are compared to many in the public sector.
 

Fokx

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2019
Messages
1,613
Location
Liverpool
3 months ago I was out working hard. A little burned out tbh and now I'm taking a back seat and enjoying football weekends away.

Completely agree with this.

Not to long a go I was one of the lucky few Conductors who never (knowingly) contracted Covid since March 2020. But what this meant was that I was covering my colleagues who were either vulnerable (and told by the government to stay at home) or were isolating (as was required at the time).

This meant my working week suddenly shot up from an average of 35 hours to around 45 every week. Every spare turn became a full job with compulsory overtime and I had no option to opt out. There was even one week where I almost fell foul of the legal continuous working hours due to being on a 10 day run, but luckily due to a train cancellation this never came about. I was also bombarded with emails and phone calls to try and cover trains on my rest days

My moral was at all time low and is much much better now. Thanks to industrial action I don’t do overtime, I don’t do Sundays, and my financial situation isn’t much worse off due to the current tax bands, but I guess I’m just selfish at the end of the day and lucky to have a job
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
Do you realise just how self-entitled that comes across as?

There’s been plenty of people been furloughed for much of the last two years, not knowing if they’ll have a job to go back to. Train crew have been lucky to carry on with full pay throughout (although go and ask your open access colleagues).

And please stop playing the “key worker” card, it doesn’t sit well. There’s been plenty of others who have been massively more important in keeping the country running and have also had at least the same level of risk, such as shop workers and nurses.
The "key worker" card is hilarious. Those who have worked massive hours of overtime (some of it unpaid) within the NHS, education and social care sectors whilst those on the railway rode around on near empty trains.

Meanwhile in the airline sector jobs have been lost massively due to the drop in demand.

Yes the railway will grow back but one of its main cash cows (the Anytime business market and season tickets) is way down on what it should be. I can see ticket offices closing and more DOO happening over the next few years.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
It's worth pointing out that Northern Drivers ballot result will be announced next week. Expect more strike action in random with TPE. Unfortunately, that's the reality.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,520
Location
Plymouth
Teacher here. My annual pay rise last September was zero (and unless the Government changes things it will be zero this September as well).

My pay has dropped 7% in real terms since 2010. If you include the changes to pension contributions that rises to 10%.
So you know exactly how crazy it is that government can inflict these real terms pay cuts. How can one negotiate a mortgage etc when one doesn't know what one will earn in the future. Nobody should be suffering realterm pay cuts over a prolonged period of time, whatever their profession, and I find it bizarre some on here are egging the government on. But I guess that's the selfish post brexit world we live in in this country. Amazing how 12 years of Tory rule has turned so many attitudes.
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
TPE conductors are in dispute and refusing to work overtime , rest days or Sundays because the work isn't financially viable. For once tax, NI, pension, travel to and from work, food etc are all takin into account a 5 hour shift is worth barely £60 while 8 hours 110.now that may sound a lot but is it worth losing a day that could be spent with family? People are understandably reluctant to come in so shifts go uncovered and rosters appeal for staff and incentives them by paying 12 hours for a 5 hour shift because it's cheaper than a cancellation. However this cherry picking demoralises the rostered workers for obvious reasons.

By offering a Sunday or rest day working agreement staff receive a more suitable renumeration that incentives them to want to come in on their days off, jobs get covered and cherry picking stops. It is better for the company as well as the staff and ultimately the passengers who can rely on the trains running.

It is important to point out Sundays for TPE guards are not part of the working week, however it is rostered overtime. Staff have to work the shift if there is no cover available and so therefore it is forced overtime as a result. Losing a day with family for £60 you can understand why staff don't want to come in
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,914
TPE conductors are in dispute and refusing to work overtime , rest days or Sundays because the work isn't financially viable. For once tax, NI, pension, travel to and from work, food etc are all takin into account a 5 hour shift is worth barely £60 while 8 hours 110.now that may sound a lot but is it worth losing a day that could be spent with family? People are understandably reluctant to come in so shifts go uncovered and rosters appeal for staff and incentives them by paying 12 hours for a 5 hour shift because it's cheaper than a cancellation. However this cherry picking demoralises the rostered workers for obvious reasons.

By offering a Sunday or rest day working agreement staff receive a more suitable renumeration that incentives them to want to come in on their days off, jobs get covered and cherry picking stops. It is better for the company as well as the staff and ultimately the passengers who can rely on the trains running.

It is important to point out Sundays for TPE guards are not part of the working week, however it is rostered overtime. Staff have to work the shift if there is no cover available and so therefore it is forced overtime as a result. Losing a day with family for £60 you can understand why staff don't want to come in
Ultimately the DfT want Sunday in the week, either for everyone or new hires. If you don't agree to that you're unlikely to get anything out of them.
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
So you know exactly how crazy it is that government can inflict these real terms pay cuts. How can one negotiate a mortgage etc when one doesn't know what one will earn in the future. Nobody should be suffering realterm pay cuts over a prolonged period of time, whatever their profession, and I find it bizarre some on here are egging the government on. But I guess that's the selfish post brexit world we live in in this country. Amazing how 12 years of Tory rule has turned so many attitudes.

I am not egging the Government on merely pointing out that a Government with a 80 seat majority with a treasury hell bent on cuts is going to look for places where cuts can be made.

The rail unions have long been on the Governments radar and some industrial action may just poke the hornets nest.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Ultimately the DfT want Sunday in the week, either for everyone or new hires. If you don't agree to that you're unlikely to get anything out of them.

I actually think hiring in new staff under new agreements is the way forward. It’s standard practice in other industries to hire in new staff on different T&Cs.
 
Last edited:

LittleAH

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2018
Messages
1,211
It is important to point out Sundays for TPE guards are not part of the working week, however it is rostered overtime. Staff have to work the shift if there is no cover available and so therefore it is forced overtime as a result. Losing a day with family for £60 you can understand why staff don't want to come in
It's also important to point out that RMT rejected the offer to bring Sunday pre-covid in the working week with a considerable increase in basic pay.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,520
Location
Plymouth
I am not egging the Government on merely pointing out that a Government with a 80 seat majority with a treasurers hell bent on cuts is going to look for places where cuts can be made.

The rail unions have long been on the Governments radar and some industrial action may just poke the hornets nest.
Yes but my point is the government will be looking for easy targets. Train crew are not an easy target. Hell of a lot of grief comes with redundancies and let's not forget trains are busy again so strikes would be disruptive to everyone. Trains are the future hence why it would seem a strange area to target when there are so many parts of the economy that are flabby and not really useful going forward that cuts could be made in. This government isn't in as stronger position as you think, infact if there were a general election tomorrow id bet on the Tories losing (although admittedly this war goes in Johnsons favour with a certain section of electorate) , and that is why I don't think they've the balls for a damaging fight with the rail unions.
The time to do it (staff cuts) was 12 months ago and they missed it. And thankfully they did, as re hiring and re training staff is an expensive and wasteful exercise!
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,679
Location
UK
It's also important to point out that RMT rejected the offer to bring Sunday pre-covid in the working week with a considerable increase in basic pay.
Indeed. Now, lo and behold, the RMT are fishing for an agreement better than what they rejected in pre-Covid circumstances.

I don't think that anyone is holding a grudge as a result, but I would be surprised if the outcome is as favourable as that proposal.
 

Fokx

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2019
Messages
1,613
Location
Liverpool
It's also important to point out that RMT rejected the offer to bring Sunday pre-covid in the working week with a considerable increase in basic pay.
Because it also came at a cost of increased working hours for the week
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
It's also important to point out that RMT rejected the offer to bring Sunday pre-covid in the working week with a considerable increase in basic pay.
Its the membership who rejected it .......and rightly so. What you fail to point out is the increase in pay came with some extra unpalatable bells and whistles in the form of a productivity deal. No doubt there will be a deal done eventually however..... probably in the summer.
 

LittleAH

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2018
Messages
1,211
Its the membership who rejected it .......and rightly so. What you fail to point out is the increase in pay came with some extra unpalatable bells and whistles in the form of a productivity deal. No doubt there will be a deal done eventually however..... probably in the summer.
Yes they did. But it also covered off the issues that have cropped up again. And some who are deflecting from the facts of previous events to try and shape/justify their argument. This isn't a case of work force versus management anymore and I really wish fellow rail workers actually understood that.

The government pay our wages, their increased subsidy has kept it afloat and continues to do so, therefore they hold the cards. If this continues, I fully expect them to go public with previous offers and watch as public support wains and more people ditch travelling on the railways. And then what?
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
Yes they did. But it also covered off the issues that have cropped up again. And some who are deflecting from the facts of previous events to try and shape/justify their argument. This isn't a case of work force versus management anymore and I really wish fellow rail workers actually understood that.

The government pay our wages, their increased subsidy has kept it afloat and continues to do so, therefore they hold the cards. If this continues, I fully expect them to go public with previous offers and watch as public support wains and more people ditch travelling on the railways. And then what?
Rail in the north has always been subsidised. No matter what the public think, rail staff are perfectly entitled to use strike action as a tool for better terms and conditions. The ballot paper is a very powerful method of doing this.
 

nedchester

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2008
Messages
2,093
Yes but my point is the government will be looking for easy targets. Train crew are not an easy target. Hell of a lot of grief comes with redundancies and let's not forget trains are busy again so strikes would be disruptive to everyone. Trains are the future hence why it would seem a strange area to target when there are so many parts of the economy that are flabby and not really useful going forward that cuts could be made in. This government isn't in as stronger position as you think, infact if there were a general election tomorrow id bet on the Tories losing (although admittedly this war goes in Johnsons favour with a certain section of electorate) , and that is why I don't think they've the balls for a damaging fight with the rail unions.
The time to do it (staff cuts) was 12 months ago and they missed it. And thankfully they did, as re hiring and re training staff is an expensive and wasteful exercise!
They didn’t do it 12 months ago as Covid was still a thing.

Remember the rail unions were in the Tory manifesto in Dec 2019 where they were talking about legislating minimum service levels even during times of industrial action.

Trains are indeed the future but I strong suspect the Government’s plans are about a more “efficient” railway…….interpret that how you like……
 

wobman

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
1,233
They didn’t do it 12 months ago as Covid was still a thing.

Remember the rail unions were in the Tory manifesto in Dec 2019 where they were talking about legislating minimum service levels even during times of industrial action.

Trains are indeed the future but I strong suspect the Government’s plans are about a more “efficient” railway…….interpret that how you like……
Hasn't the railways ran throughout the pandemic ? Haven't traincrew kept the key workers able to get to their workplaces ?

Trains and an efficient integrated public transport system is the future, but the traincrew are always looked upon as the bad guys. Imagine if the govt engaged with the people that actually work on the railways and have vast experience of the industry. Instead they choose consultants that have no clue how that railways actually work day to day, then members of the public unfortunately side with the consultants & politicians over traincrew.
 

muz379

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2014
Messages
2,501
I think the Government is up for a fight on this
And im sure they will get a fight back , not sure really who has anything to gain out of that situation staff , passengers or the government .
It is. But they all seemed to be fine doing it 3 months ago!
When there is a RDW sanction apetites for overtime always fluctuate anyway , 3/4 months ago pre christmas is probably when the apetite is at its highest as people look to get a few extra pennies for christmas , heck I dont usually do any but even I have picked up a few extras in the lead up to christmas before .

But that is during normal times which I understand. But everyone not doing any isn't the same because we also hear of people kicking off about not having any overtime and losing money...

Ultimately it boils down to the industry should have zero overtime, it should be avaliable only to cover exceptional circumstances and high levels of sickness. Which I appreciate is nothing to do with the drivers, or to be honest the TOCs anymore. It isn't even the DfT it's the treasury.

Like I say my views are strong because whatever is going on at the moment, it isn't TPE managers who are suffering. It's people who commute and my commute is currently a nightmare, so much so I've changed my job.
There are always some who kick off about losing RDW , but they are not "losing money" because the RDW is never guranteed . Some as with all groups of employees live beyond their means and have set themselves up into financial situations where they rely on their OT , that in my view is not very sensible .

I seriously doubt there will ever be a situation when the industry can completely eliminate RDW and it has its place for things like training so you can run a 5 day traction course for example with grades that are only contracted to 4 day weeks . But my perception is that many TOC's simply lived it up when they had unlimited appetite for overtime and used it to cover the cracks in their crew numbers and training deficits . Much of this is an issue of the operators and to some extend whitehalls own making with the poor operational understanding exhibited by the DFT .
Exactly. Many of those working on the railway don't know how lucky they are compared to many in the public sector.
Maybe they do and that is why they have chosen to work in that industry . But look comparing industries is moot , pre covid traincrew always reieved above inflation payrises . Broadly the same people work in the industry and will no doubt want to return to that .
Ultimately the DfT want Sunday in the week, either for everyone or new hires. If you don't agree to that you're unlikely to get anything out of them.
I dont think the unions actually have an issue with Sunday in the working week , it is in the ASLEF charter and the RMT policy has always been to look for full employment , a clean salary and no overtime as well . Some individual members might have an issue but overall if sensible proposals are made from both sides to bring Sundays inside the working week I can see them being accepted by staff . Again referring to the DFT's poor operational understanding I think for years they have udnerestimated or been unable to account for the number of extra staff required to provide a reliable sunday service instead looking for unpalatable options like increasing the working week with very little compensation as was the case with the last TPE deal .
I actually think hiring in new staff under new agreements is the way forward. It’s standard practice in other industries to hire in new staff on different T&Cs.
To provide a meaningful sunday service you would have to hire many new staff on these new agreements , but Northern and TPE have already hired loads of new traincrew over the past 4 years in anticipation of new sunday timetables connected to the franchise commitments of the now void franchise agreements .Obviously those franchises are consigned to history but a sensible sunday service has got to be part of the recovery of rail in the North as its a huge untapped leisure market .

Of course you could try and hire sunday only traincrew and tbh with the DFT's lack of operational understanding it would not suprise me if this was attempted . But that would be doomed to failure .
It's also important to point out that RMT rejected the offer to bring Sunday pre-covid in the working week with a considerable increase in basic pay.
the RMT members rejected the offer , important nuanced distinction , the union actually put the offer out to the members .
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,806
As pointed out above , all train crew realise that Sundays inside the working week will eventually happen. But it comes with a price......
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,277
Location
Bolton
I don't think anyone disagrees with the idea that people deserve a pay rise at least in line with CPIH. I would say that goes for just about every worker in the economy. The difficulty arises when we consider the cost of providing above inflation pay rises to all public sector paid workers (including now almost all railway staff). The implications for that are significant in terms of the tax revenues we can raise. I'm even up for large rises in public sector borrowing short term to fund this. More importantly by far than debating on the internet is the question of how you convince the Treasury and Ministers that doing that extra bit of tax and spending is sensible. Bluntly if you were eligible to vote but didn't choose to vote for an opposition party you've now got no business complaining about public sector pay. You get exactly what you wanted.
 
Last edited:

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
6,476
Location
Sheffield
Department for Transport statistics show National Rail passenger levels for the most recent period 7th - 21st February are still as low as 57% and 74% of pre-Covid. The average is creeping up very slowly towards 65%. It will take a lot to recover the missing 35% when most were regular commuters now working from home. Some routes are more impacted than others and times of day are very relevant.

Loss of revenue isn't quite as much because leisure users and those commuting a few days a week tend to pay more, but there's a massive gap between income and outgoings to be filled, maybe 30% more than pre-Covid. No sane business manager will readily take on more expenditure in such a scenario. That means everything, but everything, has to be considered. Things like restoring long closed railways must be questioned when we can't afford to run the ones we have.

Any extra expenditure should only be considered if it can reasonably guarantee an increase in income that's greater than the extra spend. Alternatively, demonstrate how greater efficiencies can reduce costs to offset extra expenditure. Avoid anything that may alienate customers. Get them onside to buy more tickets.

Far too simple? Getting passengers back in numbers, and soon, is more likely to encourage any loosening of the financial shackles.

I could make a long list of desirable items that might help the customer/passenger experience but they're well recorded in many other threads! Restored and improved timetables, longer trains where needed, refurbished tatty trains, train catering, better shelter and toilets on smaller stations, we all have our favourites. The big one is the train being there when it should be.

When in dispute avoid the ultimate strike action, or anything that adversely impacts the customer. The difficulty here is that on the railway the ultimate weapon has become the normal weapon.

But it's now 25 years since I was actively involved in my union.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top