• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 365 scrap movements + preservation discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

W

warwickshire

On Moderation
Joined
6 Feb 2020
Messages
2,304
Location
leamingtonspa
Mag_seven said:
Reported as just one unit - 365524.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much.
Interesting thought that one might have been one off the units involved.
So looking like part off it as discussed will go by road onwards to ekr from Newport.
However quite interesting though as the Belmont units appear to be going one by one. However thanking you all for the information.
 
D365

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
All four carriages of 524 are going to EKR? Or are they mix-and-matching with 530 540?
 
Last edited:
bramling

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,391
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
D365 said:
All four carriages of 524 are going to EKR? Or are they mix-and-matching with 530?
Click to expand...

From what I gather, the plan is two vehicles from 365524 (presumably the trailer vehicles?), plus a driving car from 365540 which has already been moved.
 
Last edited:
Y

YSTrains

On Moderation
Joined
13 Dec 2021
Messages
157
Location
London
As of 28th January 2022:
Stored: 504, 506, 510, 516, 520, 522, 525, 528, 530, 536

Preserved: 524 (two carriages), 540 (carriage no. 65974)

Scrapped: 501, 502, 503, 505, 507, 508, 509, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 517, 518, 519, 521, 523, 524(other two carriages), 526, 527, 529, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 537, 538, 539, 540(the other 3), 541
 
43096

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,835
YSTrains said:
As of 28th January 2022:
Stored: 504, 506, 510, 516, 520, 522, 525, 528, 530, 536

Preserved: 524 (two carriages), 540 (carriage no. 65974)

Scrapped: 501, 502, 503, 505, 507, 508, 509, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 517, 518, 519, 521, 523, 524(other two carriages), 526, 527, 529, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 537, 538, 539, 540(the other 3), 541
Click to expand...
65917 and 72287 are reported as the two vehicles from 365524 saved.
 
D

Dave91131

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2018
Messages
671
43096 said:
65917 and 72287 are reported as the two vehicles from 365524 saved.
Click to expand...

I *think* 72287 is the non-pantograph trailer but does have the big loo - whether that is stripped out or retained remains to be seen.
 
4SubAsociation

4SubAsociation

Verified Rep
Joined
4 Dec 2020
Messages
300
Location
Ashford, Kent
Ok. Some video have been shared of the Class 365 arriving at the EKR.

It is on TikTok (you have been warned). 1st and 3rd video are of the 365. 2nd video is of the SERA Class 457 being rotated (how you turn a train without a turntable).

TikTok - Make Your Day

www.tiktok.com
 
The_Train

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
Anyone seen any confirmation anywhere that it is 65917 and 72287 which have been saved and delivered to the EKR?
 
Fuzzytop

Fuzzytop

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
306
That looks like at Belmont, with the 91 next to it.

Wonder why they are ripping out the seats - for use by EKR, perhaps?
 
C

CDM

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2012
Messages
72
bramling said:
From what I gather it's a driving car from 365540 which has arrived at Shepherdswell. This would seem to suggest that only two cars from 365524 are to be preserved, I think the plan was only ever for three cars. So not a complete unit, sadly.
Click to expand...
I just don't get this... What even is the point of preserving 3 coaches of what have always been a 4 coach unit? What possible good reason if there for not adding a fourth vehicle (the extra driving vehicle).
 
Class 466

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
2,139
Location
Atherton, UK
CDM said:
I just don't get this... What even is the point of preserving 3 coaches of what have always been a 4 coach unit? What possible good reason if there for not adding a fourth vehicle (the extra driving vehicle).
Click to expand...
Space on the railway prevented it.
 
bramling

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,391
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
CDM said:
I just don't get this... What even is the point of preserving 3 coaches of what have always been a 4 coach unit? What possible good reason if there for not adding a fourth vehicle (the extra driving vehicle).
Click to expand...

I think it's a case that three is better than zero, especially if three is what there's space for. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good and all that. I believe complications over the logistics resulted in the driving car from 365540 creeping in.

Of course, these units should have been in frontline service for a good 10 or so years.
 
C

CDM

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2012
Messages
72
bramling said:
I think it's a case that three is better than zero, especially if three is what there's space for. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good and all that.
Click to expand...
That certainly a pragmatic and practical way of look at it, for sure.
Another would be a few track panels in the car park for the fourth vehicle, pending future developments. Once it's gone, it's gone.

bramling said:
Of course, these units should have been in frontline service for a good 10 or so years.
Click to expand...
Quite. Plenty of good rolling stock going to waste at the moment, rather than cascading out older stuff.
Lack of any central coherent rolling stock strategy, resulting in wasted cash (again). But we can disappear down that rabbit hole forever.
 
D365

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
CDM said:
I just don't get this... What even is the point of preserving 3 coaches of what have always been a 4 coach unit? What possible good reason if there for not adding a fourth vehicle (the extra driving vehicle).
Click to expand...
Siemens only ”preserved” three coaches from a four car 332. So it’s not even the first time that this has happened.
 
D

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,927
Location
First Class
D365 said:
Siemens only ”preserved” three coaches from a four car 332. So it’s not even the first time that this has happened.
Click to expand...

There are only two DMBTs from 4DD unit 4002 preserved so it’s definitely not the first time it’s happened!
 
43102EMR

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,372
Location
UK
D365 said:
Siemens only ”preserved” three coaches from a four car 332. So it’s not even the first time that this has happened.
Click to expand...
Only two DMSOs from 317345 preserved as well!
 
4SubAsociation

4SubAsociation

Verified Rep
Joined
4 Dec 2020
Messages
300
Location
Ashford, Kent
I will create a thread in the Railtours and Preservation thread. There is way more than those listed and i will try and fill the gaps on why some EMUs are incomplete.

Link -https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/incomplete-preserved-emus.227873/#post-5522910
 
Last edited:
W

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,631
Location
South Staffordshire
CDM said:
I just don't get this... What even is the point of preserving 3 coaches of what have always been a 4 coach unit? What possible good reason if there for not adding a fourth vehicle (the extra driving vehicle).
Click to expand...
As the unit is highly unlikely ever to be anything more than a static display it doesn't really matter too much, particularly if the host is acutely short of siding space
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top