Adrian1980uk
Member
- Joined
- 24 May 2016
- Messages
- 840
The 755s are a real upgrade on the 170s they replace on the Cambridge line, feel much more
Solid and better fit for a regional city link
Solid and better fit for a regional city link
They're fitted with detectors that prevent them striking platform edges.Only worry I'd have would be the ability of the gap fillers and lower level floors to cope with some of Northern's somewhat irregular platform edges - and their serviceability in long term service. Another thing to go wrong?
But how well do they cope with very low platforms set back some way from the track? And how durable will the system be in all weathers over time? I'm all in favour but fear units may be out of service due to retraction faults. Presumably trials have ensured they are reliable.They're fitted with detectors that prevent them striking platform edges.
Well, once they reach the limit of their extension there's nothing more they can do - but that's still better than nothing.But how well do they cope with very low platforms set back some way from the track? And how durable will the system be in all weathers over time? I'm all in favour but fear units may be out of service due to retraction faults. Presumably trials have ensured they are reliable.
Small children have almost fallen down here. I've seen a small dog on lead being dragged back up by it's collar, and one owner dived under the train to rescue hers! We can't get gap fillers fast enough - but another 25 years?Well, once they reach the limit of their extension there's nothing more they can do - but that's still better than nothing.
As to their reliability; they've been in use extensively on the continent for over a decade now, which I have to assume counts for something. I also believe there is a procedure for manually forcing their retraction in the event of a failure, but I can't say for certain exactly what it is.


The lower floor level of a FLIRT will reduce the vertical separation, and the gap filler will mean that the remaining height difference can be handled by a passenger making a small step up, rather a large step up and forward.Small children have almost fallen down here. I've seen a small dog on lead being dragged back up by it's collar, and one owner dived under the train to rescue hers! We can't get gap fillers fast enough - but another 25 years?
Not an EPB
Not an HST
Not a 442
Not a 365
![]()
Probably because it almost certainly is. The Swiss are not known for producing anything but well designed and quality gear (and I'm aware some were built in Poland, but look at what Honda & Toyota did for British car manufacturing quality).195 feels cheap and tacky by comparison.
We should be carefull about such thoughts about Chinese rubbush. Im old enoogh th remember when the same was said about Japanese the then Korean bikes and cars etc and look what happened there.Probably because it almost certainly is. The Swiss are not known for producing anything but well designed and quality gear (and I'm aware some were built in Poland, but look at what Honda & Toyota did for British car manufacturing quality).
You only have to go into a Swiss hardware/tool shop to see they only sell quality Swiss and German gear not like the Chinese rubbish you get in our country, it makes me want to cry.
Well, once they reach the limit of their extension there's nothing more they can do - but that's still better than nothing.
As to their reliability; they've been in use extensively on the continent for over a decade now, which I have to assume counts for something. I also believe there is a procedure for manually forcing their retraction in the event of a failure, but I can't say for certain exactly what it is.
I thought it might be like that. Cheers.If they fail to retract its just a matter of isolating them and pushing them in, then re-energising and locking them in place. Worth noting the door and step need to be locked out together, they are one and the same as far as door interlock is concerned.
The CAFs do the job and bar for the 100mph stretches and 2 hour + hauls, they are fine. I imagine much of the disappointment comes from enthusiasts who wish they had our Anglia Stadlers which I admit I feel we are very lucky to have.
About 30 years ago I did witness a child fall between the gap between train and platform. It was a class 10x and the guard had just done the buzz buzz with the train starting to move. Fortunately guard was on the ball and managed to stop the train in time. Slipped down and retrieved the boy, buzz buzz and they were away. I guess these days the job would be stopped for investigations etc.Small children have almost fallen down here. I've seen a small dog on lead being dragged back up by it's collar, and one owner dived under the train to rescue hers! We can't get gap fillers fast enough - but another 25 years?
Agree.The 755 is the sensible choice given that they eliminate diesel operation 25kV fitted track.
Significant reductions in near term fuel consumption could be achieved using them.
power at every seat
What problems did you have exactly, the seats, the ride quality or something else?Pre-lockdown I was doing a round trip to Manchester on them 5 times a week. 45 minutes each way, never over 70mph, and they are not OK. To paraphrase an old boss of mine, the 195s being lauded as “better than a Pacer or 150” merely makes them the tallest dwarf
What problems did you have exactly, the seats, the ride quality or something else?
Bingo!Not an EPB
Not an HST
Not a 442
Not a 365
![]()
A class 195 is better than a class 150/153/156, after that there is nothing positive to add.
No they don’t however they have greater capacity with the large doorways with stand back areas. They also have air conditioning, are much quieter and have cleaner and more efficient engines with superior acceleration which is a step up from a 156.Does the 2 carriage 195 have as much seating as a 156 ?
If not, then it's not better I'm afraid.
They should have been built as 3 carriage units or not at all as far as I'm concerned.
Adequate seating capacity is the main requirement for the passenger experience. The other things mentioned are pretty subjective.No they don’t however they have greater capacity with the large doorways with stand back areas. They also have air conditioning, are much quieter and have cleaner and more efficient engines with superior acceleration which is a step up from a 156.
I agree that they should have all been built as 3 cars and even some built as 4 car units for busier corridors such as the Calder Valley line and Windermere.
I'm sure I saw somewhere the 156s would be replaced by cascaded 170s, but I can't remember for the life of me where I saw it. I also can't remember what the 170s were supposed to be replaced by, so maybe you should campaign for the 755 to be their replacement.I've yet to experience the joys of a 755, but they look fantastic, and I wonder how they compare in terms of leasing and running costs with other regional trains. I certainly hope we end up with something that good when ScotRail think about replacing the 15x DMUs on their long rural routes, with a thrash pod powered by batteries/hydrogen/bionic duckweed etc.
150 and 153 yes. 156 no.
I always thought the main problem was capacity. Which the 195s sort of sort out with their 3 car units, although for some reason they built some 2 car units too. At least for Northern, 2 car makes no sense, and I always watch in amazement whenever I see the 2 car 150 from Manchester pull in, and enough people get out to fill a 4 car set.Hard disagree there. Although I agree the 156s are a cut above the other 2, every time I get on a 195 now, despite their flaws, I'm thinking about how glad I am that I'm not on anything from the Sprinter family, maybe barring the 158.