• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Concrete vs wooden sleepers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Philip

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2007
Messages
3,734
Location
Manchester
Wooden sleepers tend to lead to noisier rails don't they, because they increase the risk of rail corrugation?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,649
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
All I am after is the actual cost to me of buying one complete new sleeper.
I do realise the other factors come to play but that was not my question.


£18.25 from that supplier.

Edit: Ah, a concrete one. Doubt they are sold to the public TBH, they aren't exactly what you'd want in your garden! :)

20 quid for a used one:

 

Ken H

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,718
Location
N Yorks
Further to the above discussion of the Newark flat crossing, the thread in the "Speculative Ideas" subforum about grade separation of the crossing has been reopened at my request, because of proposals to dual the A46 which may affect any future rail flyover proposal.

in a sensible world, they would put the rail line on the same bridge as the new road. They need to fix the roundabout a bit to the west, as the queue for the level crossing backs up onto the A46.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,910
Pedantically, ‘bearers’ is a term for sleepers that are under S&C, or where there is longitudinal support, usually on bridges or viaducts.

For a relatively easy to understand explanation of steel sleepers, the linked presentation is excellent, albeit in my view a little too ‘steel sleeper happy’. It’s way too large to quote (sorry).

In the old days, we called wood under S & C "timbers", then someone invented concrete "timbers" so the name was changed. Longitudinal wood across bridges etc, we called "waybeams".
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
in a sensible world, they would put the rail line on the same bridge as the new road.
That appears to have been the plan at some stage in history, according to the post by najaB in the linked thread.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,914
Location
Cambridge, UK
The wood versus concrete debate is an interesting one (as an amateur observer).

I've been on a couple of train-watching trips to western Canada over the last decade, and I don't remember seeing any concrete-sleepered track on the CP and CN mainlines - a lot of their track is CWR laid on wood sleepers, busy with 32+ tonne axleload freight trains (I'd estimate between 50 and 100 million gross tonnes per annum on the routes to the west coast).

The US railroads tend to be more mixed - some seem to favour concrete for new/renewed track, others seem to have a preference for wood.

Of course the US and Canada have large forest reserves, so I assume suitable high quality timber is somewhat cheaper than it is in Europe, which doubtless influences the sleeper material choices...
 

billh

Member
Joined
7 Jan 2015
Messages
320

£18.25 from that supplier.

Edit: Ah, a concrete one. Doubt they are sold to the public TBH, they aren't exactly what you'd want in your garden! :)

20 quid for a used one:

We bought 200 concrete sleepers from BR, 40 years ago. 60p a go,shift them yourself....
The logistics of shifting them from a derelict railway to our premises, less than half a mile, not on a public road was daunting. It was also problematic lifting them into position for their intended use (mostly not underneath rails). These sleepers had been used with bullhead rail and fairly conventional chairs,there were 4 7/8in through bolts firmly rusted into the concrete in each unit which we didn't need, that had to be driven out. All those sleepers are still in use and have not deterorated in any way, probably c80 years old by now. Used wooden sleepers last about 15 years before rotting to bits.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,875
No

I just want to know the unit cost of 1 new fully fitted Steel Sleeper and an equivalent new G44.
I do not want to buy used material.

I seem to recall about 10 year back a Steel sleeper as specified was approx £56 - has that changed?

When you say ‘fully fitted’ do you mean pads / clips / nylons? (As opposed to ‘fully installed’).

And the cost being the bulk cost, delivered, per sleeper, as charged by the NR supply chain? (Which is what that approx £56 would have been). As opposed to the cost of trying to buy just one sleeper. Which would be a lot more.
 

furnessvale

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2015
Messages
4,910
That's what I am after.
Fully fited is complete with Pads, clips and insultators.
In which case your only chance is to contact the manufacturer directly and ask them for precisely what you want.

Anyone on here can only guess or possibly be privvy to NR bulk buying prices which, if divided down to one sleeper, would give a hopelessly low price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top