• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Restrictions on 180s and more

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Spoke to a Hull Trains guard this morning while dispatching it and she mentioned that they're not allowed to run with just 2 engines - I don't know if they can run ECS on 2 engines though but anyway is there a similiar restriction in place for GC/Northern 180s, Virgin/XC 220s, 221s etc...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,563
When a 180 engine shuts down the next vehicle cross feeds the electrics for the shut down car. When down to 2 engines the auxiliary supply cannot be maintained as there isn't enough cross feed to go round, and with only two electrically powered compressors the set would also struggle to maintain air. Actually moving a 180 on 2 engines is a painfully slow process too. If a 180 would be down to 2 engines then it would only be run to a location where it could be dumped. Our 180s are taken out of traffic on 3 engines if possible.
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
Surely it's pretty dire straights when less than half of the engines on board are operational?
 

Eng274

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2010
Messages
796
TransPennine Express services from Manchester Airport to Scotland run on 2 out of 3 engines as part of their ISO 14001 environmental awareness certification. Each engine is 750hp (similar to 220/221 i think). Each coach weighs in at a hefty ~52 tonnes, but such measures probably suit the long-distance routes compared to the start-stop nature of other TPE routes.

I was on a 185 from Liverpool LS - Manchester Oxford Road once, with 3 engines they really can shift! Only ever been on them with 2 engines down the WCML any other time.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,103
Location
Redcar
similar to 220/221 i think

Nope exactly the same, 220/221/222/185/180 all use the same engine, Cummins something or other, can't remember exactly.

Eco-mode is quite good, when your in a carriage that has the engine turned off the ride given by a 185 is just as good as any other loco-hauled rolling stock.
 

Eng274

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2010
Messages
796
Nope exactly the same, 220/221/222/185/180 all use the same engine, Cummins something or other, can't remember exactly.

Eco-mode is quite good, when your in a carriage that has the engine turned off the ride given by a 185 is just as good as any other loco-hauled rolling stock.

Cummins QSK-19, 19litre 4-stroke 6cyl horizontal turbocharged diesel i believe. Sounds best with the 3-circuit Voith hydraulic transmission, rather than the rev-the-nuts-off diesel electric system.

A set-up like this could encourage lazy maintenance though, in a 10 years there could be a few units where only 2 engines actually work, since the 3rd isnt 'necessary'.. Hopefully Keolis have a share of the TPE pie big enough to prevent them falling to Firstbus SE Scotland standards of 'maintenance'.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
while were on the subject on 180s, while i was changing trains at Doncaster a few years back, i saw a hull trains operated 180 alighting, and the guard was closing the doors (i think) and nearly locked himself out his own train! he had to wrestle them to stay open while he scrambled on.. did this catch out HT guards frequently?
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,292
I was on a 185 from Liverpool LS - Manchester Oxford Road once, with 3 engines they really can shift! Only ever been on them with 2 engines down the WCML any other time.

You may also be suprised to hear that they can be faster, as they have two power notches locked out of use :)
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,103
Location
Redcar
You may also be suprised to hear that they can be faster, as they have two power notches locked out of use

Interesting, I've often thought that they must be overpowered what with having engines designed to power 125mph trains rather than 100mph. Wonder what would have to be done to modify them for faster running? (Not that I'm suggesting it would be worthwhile, just curious.)
 

Eng274

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2010
Messages
796
Interesting, I've often thought that they must be overpowered what with having engines designed to power 125mph trains rather than 100mph. Wonder what would have to be done to modify them for faster running? (Not that I'm suggesting it would be worthwhile, just curious.)

The 185 weighs around 52t per car, which even compared to lesser DMUs is still rather high horsepower/tonne; although at the end of the day Torque is what really counts! Maybe siemens designed them to be retrofittable for higher speed running. Adjustment/replacement of the transmission and possibly uprated braking system and engine cooling could see the 185 good for 125mph (purely speculation though..)
 

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
I prefer the 'rev-the-nuts-off' diesel-electric transmission - corking noise!
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
220s/221s are 2 engines max as well. 185s have to have 2 as well, can limp to next major station if just 1.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
220s/221s are 2 engines max as well. 185s have to have 2 as well, can limp to next major station if just 1.

Well I don't know what the driver did but he manage to coax the third engine back into life - far too complicated with all these modern electrics etc...!

That's the good thing about the Multiple Units with more then one engine, if one fails then the remaining engine/engines can be used to move the train clear of the line.

Anyway with no luck on Google, have seating plans for the Hull Trains 180s been released?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,103
Location
Redcar
far too complicated with all these modern electrics etc...!

Indeed, back in the good old days you simply took a large hammer or spanner and hit the damn thing till it started working again!

;)
 

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
while were on the subject on 180s, while i was changing trains at Doncaster a few years back, i saw a hull trains operated 180 alighting, and the guard was closing the doors (i think) and nearly locked himself out his own train! he had to wrestle them to stay open while he scrambled on.. did this catch out HT guards frequently?

shouldn't be a huge problem. There's a handle at platform level for opening these doors.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
Indeed, back in the good old days you simply took a large hammer or spanner and hit the damn thing till it started working again!

;)

Don't joke - last September I saw staff at Lime Street hitting the belly of the Pacer I was sitting on ready to depart with large objects in an attempt to coax the engine back to life.

It worked. After 10 mins of repeated bashing!!
 
Joined
7 Jan 2010
Messages
254
shouldn't be a huge problem. There's a handle at platform level for opening these doors.

Only on the A2 and B1 doors ;)
Plus it's not ideal to pull the access handle and put the emergency brake in, then pull the egress handle so the doors don't close while you reset the access handle. Driver's tend to get a little upset.
 

Sir_Clagalot

Member
Joined
9 Aug 2007
Messages
853
With regards to the 185s and 125mph running, the seating in coach C (ie, not FC/Dis toilet) would need to be removed to allow a space between the front of the train and the punters should the worst happen
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,668
With regards to the 185s and 125mph running, the seating in coach C (ie, not FC/Dis toilet) would need to be removed to allow a space between the front of the train and the punters should the worst happen

There has to be a certain distance between front seats and fron of train for high speed? hence the massive gaps at front of pendilino's etc?
 

323235

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2007
Messages
2,127
Location
North East Cheshire
Don't joke - last September I saw staff at Lime Street hitting the belly of the Pacer I was sitting on ready to depart with large objects in an attempt to coax the engine back to life.

It worked. After 10 mins of repeated bashing!!

and they were doing that even after the more recent incident pacer falling to bits whilst in service. :lol:
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,103
Location
Redcar
There has to be a certain distance between front seats and fron of train for high speed? hence the massive gaps at front of pendilino's etc?

Yep all modern unit stock that travels at 125mph needs space for crumple zones in order to preserve the integrity of the passenger inhabited part of the train in the event of a head on collision.

On locos of course the loco provides the crumple zone.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,668
Yep all modern unit stock that travels at 125mph needs space for crumple zones in order to preserve the integrity of the passenger inhabited part of the train in the event of a head on collision.

On locos of course the loco provides the crumple zone.

Thanks, didn't know that but it makes sense

poor driver though hes not got a chance
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,777
Location
South London
Yes, it used to be that passengers couldn't travel in the leading vehicles of a 125mph train, hence HSTs/91+DVT. Now I believe it's the front third of the leading vehicles, hence the enormous kitchen and luggage area on Pendos.
 

cyclebytrain

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2009
Messages
311
Yes, it used to be that passengers couldn't travel in the leading vehicles of a 125mph train, hence HSTs/91+DVT. Now I believe it's the front third of the leading vehicles, hence the enormous kitchen and luggage area on Pendos.

Where is that space on a 395? The seats get pretty close to the cab, certainly nothing like the space on a 390 (is it the nose?)
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,668
Where is that space on a 395? The seats get pretty close to the cab, certainly nothing like the space on a 390 (is it the nose?)

When you look seats actually start quite far back and the door takes alot fo scape too, it does look like a third just. And being new they may have much better crumple zones.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
Also seating in the leading vehicles has to be mostly unidirectional, hence virtually no tables in Pendo A+K.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
Indeed, back in the good old days you simply took a large hammer or spanner and hit the damn thing till it started working again!
. . . last September I saw staff at Lime Street hitting the belly of the Pacer I was sitting on ready to depart with large objects in an attempt to coax the engine back to life.

It worked. After 10 mins of repeated bashing!!
The leading edge of a steel-toe-capped boot has its uses in the absence of a hammer.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,058
Location
Reston City Centre
There has to be a certain distance between front seats and fron of train for high speed? hence the massive gaps at front of pendilino's etc?

...hence Voyagers only really having two or three coaches (plus two "half" coaches at either end), which is why a five car voyager seems much bigger than a four car (more than the additional 25% of coaches, I mean)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top