• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Shortage of drivers on GWR

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
If a driver phones in to say he's got to self-isolate for ten days as a contact has tested positive but *he's asymptomatic do GWR arrange for him to be tested so he can return if the result is negative?


You can only get a free NHS test if at least one of the following applies:

  • you have a high temperature
  • you have a new, continuous cough
  • you’ve lost your sense of smell or taste or it’s changed
  • you’ve been asked to get a test by a local council
  • you’re taking part in a government pilot project
  • you’ve been asked to get a test to confirm a positive result

You can also get a test for someone you live with if they have symptoms.


Also if your app tells you to isolate you have to isolate for the entire period. Even if you then test negative.

*or she
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,998
You can only get a free NHS test if at least one of the following applies:

  • you have a high temperature
  • you have a new, continuous cough
  • you’ve lost your sense of smell or taste or it’s changed
  • you’ve been asked to get a test by a local council
  • you’re taking part in a government pilot project
  • you’ve been asked to get a test to confirm a positive result

You can also get a test for someone you live with if they have symptoms.


Also if your app tells you to isolate you have to isolate for the entire period. Even if you then test negative.

*or she
Ah. Ok. I'm in Wales and here you can end your self-isolation if you get a negative test result apparently


Ending self-isolation for those who have received a negative test result​

If you have had a negative test, then you may end your self-isolation when you are notified of the negative result even if you still have symptoms.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,562
Location
UK
Ah. Ok. I'm in Wales and here you can end your self-isolation if you get a negative test result apparently


I think you are reading the guide wrong. This paragraph is taken from the guide.

Ending self-isolation if you have been contacted by Test, Trace, Protect (TTP) to confirm you have been in close contact with someone who has been tested positive for COVID-19​


You must self-isolate for 10 days. Even if you have a test and the result of that test is negative, you must still self-isolate for the full 10 days as advised. This is because you are a close contact of someone who has COVID-19 and the virus can take up to 10 days to show in your system.

From the way I read it the guide clearly states :

Who this guide is for​


This advice is intended for:
  • people who have received a positive test result for COVID-19
  • people with symptoms of COVID-19 who are waiting for a test result, or who have not been tested and do not require hospital treatment, who must remain at home for the appropriate self-isolation period (further details below)
  • people living in households with someone who shows symptoms that may be caused by COVID-19 or who has received a positive test result for COVID-19
  • people of all ages incluing children.

So if you have symptoms and are isolating because you have symptoms but then test negative, you can then end your isolation. If you are in contact with someone displaying symptomes you have to SELF isolate. The self isolation process is different from being told specifically to isolate because the app has told you to. The person who is displaying symptoms is the key here. They will need to prove a negative test to allow others around them to stop isolating.

My TOC has a whole bundle of testing kits and are regularly testing staff members for various reasons. Being tested whilst asymptomatic isn't an effective way to detect if you have the virus or not. This is why people should only get tested when they show symptoms. We use ours to put people into "bubbles" so the risks or infection are mitigated against and isolations can be kept to a minimum.
 

father_jack

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2010
Messages
1,557
To be honest this is sensible providing the journey between Gloucester and Cheltenham (and beyond) can be made easily by other operators.
The poor old Golden Valley is always the bridesmaid. There have been trains caped all week. What other operators could you suggest for Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse ?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,036
Location
London
The poor old Golden Valley is always the bridesmaid. There have been trains caped all week. What other operators could you suggest for Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse ?

Referring to the section between Gloucester - Cheltenham ONLY was the commentators aim I believe. The shuttle is all stops Swindon <-> Gloucester, albeit still a low frequency. Earlier on in GWR's Covid timetable there wasn't a through service from Paddington at all 7 days a week.
 

deep south

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
87
Could they not be more flexible with annual leave and allow it to be carried over. I appreciate there might be issues next year but it might help a little. Anything is better than nothing.
Accountants don't like this, as it creates a financial accrual on the books, and has an impact on the profit/loss account.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
Either that (or Manchester, both depots have drivers working to Holyhead) or it's being done as a night turn with a few hours break in Holyhead. I've not seen the timings to work out if that's possible. Avanti are always going to need taxis to some degree though, Polmadie is their only maintenance depot within walking distance of a traincrew depot.
Thank you.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,892
Accountants don't like this, as it creates a financial accrual on the books, and has an impact on the profit/loss account.
So what? There's plenty of other reasons for payroll accruals, yet they get done. In many businesses staff are salaried anyway so the cost is the same each month regardless of what leave they take, which makes it more of an operational management issue than anything else.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,025
Location
here to eternity
The poor old Golden Valley is always the bridesmaid. There have been trains caped all week. What other operators could you suggest for Kemble, Stroud and Stonehouse ?

Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?
 

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
3,199
So what? There's plenty of other reasons for payroll accruals, yet they get done. In many businesses staff are salaried anyway so the cost is the same each month regardless of what leave they take, which makes it more of an operational management issue than anything else.

I guess to the pedant it could affect an operators compliance with the terms of their Emergency Measures Agreements?
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,531
Location
Plymouth
Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?
Too be fair until now the railway (certainly the Western region) hasn't struggled with crew shortages. But now there are several outbreaks and the south is being far harder hit than the North and inevitably it is now affecting the traincrew depots at TOCs like GWR in the same way depots at places like Liverpool and Manchester where adversely affected in the first covid wave.
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?


The current shortages are due to exceptional circumstances
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,240
Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?
Arriva Bus has driver shortages on Merseyside to the degree that three services (at least) are currently being operated by other companies.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,025
Location
here to eternity
The current shortages are due to exceptional circumstances
Arriva Bus has driver shortages on Merseyside to the degree that three services (at least) are currently being operated by other companies.

I was thinking more generally as even pre COVID the Swindon-Cheltenham line was always first in line for services being cancelled due to staff shortages.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?
I'm pondering if other transport sectors don't have as much reliance on transporting their staff (by taxi) between locations which (in the context of the railway)
a) means less productive time per duty and;​
b) increases their exposure risk​
Could they not be more flexible with annual leave and allow it to be carried over. I appreciate there might be issues next year but it might help a little. Anything is better than nothing.
So what? There's plenty of other reasons for payroll accruals, yet they get done. In many businesses staff are salaried anyway so the cost is the same each month regardless of what leave they take, which makes it more of an operational management issue than anything else.
Not wishing to be a killjoy but I guess this is the crux of the issue - if you permit leave to be carried over then there comes a point when you will not have enough staff available to operate the service at some future point.
Yes it is harsh and I'd be livid if I lost my annual leave but I can't really see a way around the problem.

I wish a speedy recovery to all who are currently affected.
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
I'm pondering if other transport sectors don't have as much reliance on transporting their staff (by taxi) between locations which (in the context of the railway)
a) means less productive time per duty and;​
b) increases their exposure risk​

Another factor could be that in many places bus drivers seem to be expected to have breaks at the road side rather than have access to proper messroom facilities. Under these circumstances alone, that may be advantageous. But as I've said, I have been very dubious about the taxiing we do.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,453
Accountants don't like this, as it creates a financial accrual on the books, and has an impact on the profit/loss account.
May be but then telling people not to travel has an even bigger impact on the profit / loss account.

These are unusual times that surely call for different measures

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm pondering if other transport sectors don't have as much reliance on transporting their staff (by taxi) between locations which (in the context of the railway)
a) means less productive time per duty and;​
b) increases their exposure risk​


Not wishing to be a killjoy but I guess this is the crux of the issue - if you permit leave to be carried over then there comes a point when you will not have enough staff available to operate the service at some future point.
Yes it is harsh and I'd be livid if I lost my annual leave but I can't really see a way around the problem.

I wish a speedy recovery to all who are currently affected.
I have been allowed to take up to 2 years to use up my leave. My leave year runs 4 June to 3June the following year as it is based on the date I started. I prefer that ti January to December and I've been under that scheme in the past too.
 
Last edited:

Lancs

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2017
Messages
49
Yes it is harsh and I'd be livid if I lost my annual leave but I can't really see a way around the problem.
The solution is to pay the employee for untaken leave (ie. buy the holiday allowance from them). However, the accountants like this even less!
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,559
We need to learn from Australia where you can roll over all your leave for years then take a three month sabbatical.

No doubt their isolated geographic position lies behind this, but their businesses are able to cope fine with offering this flexibility.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,036
Location
London
Cancelled until 4/1/21. Customer hosts isolating due to alleged mess room transmissions.

There are also some issues with loco drivers - again they're being utilised to do other jobs.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?

Well there's several reasons - as stated above its easier to cancel one line of route rather than ad--hoc cancellations on all routes which can have an even wider impact. Additionally, I doubt the route learning requirements for bus drivers are the same as train drivers; not all depots sign all routes so that can compound the issue on specific routes. And also it hasn't been that much of a "big thing"; up to now throughout Covid, GWR have had no crew issues whatsoever.

When you have a local outbreak, a shortage of trained drivers due to Covid delays and a timetable increase all at the same time, the result is entirely expected - cancelled trains.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
3,278
I the “use it or lose it” method for leave is just lazy management in my book. As a former BR Area Finance Manager, I had no difficulty in accruing for leave carried forward. I used to book a proportion of it to be taken in the following year, with the appropriate cover built into the establishment/hours worked for that depot. My AM&EE and me would then give all the Depot Engineers specific targets to sort it out. Some did, some were hopeless at it.

You have to be a bit careful about letting staff go on long periods of leave when you have a leave roster, on grounds of fairness. Done right, it can get rid of accrued leave. But in every depot I’ve worked at (in a technical capacity), there are always those who just won’t go on leave!

Getting back to the subject, don’t forget the rail industry also has a high proportion of partners working in public facing public service roles, such as in health or education, as well as working in private roles such as retail. The risks of rail staff being put off for 10 days by the App therefore get magnified, especially in a local hotspot.
 

tiptoptaff

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2013
Messages
3,228
GWR has a policy for allowing us to carry leave over, but we have to apply to do it. We get 4 days automatically granted (I think) and the rest needs approval at director level. Rostered leave still had to be taken during the year, regardless of the situation, so many crew took their annual leave in lockdown.

It would be impractical to carry over a years worth of leave for a whole depot, as it would be fairly difficult to fit it all in the year after without allowing extra quotas of ad-hoc leave per day, and the associated coverage issues that things. Now amplify that across the business.

Can quite image the thread on here next summer because GWR had to cancel a load of services because they've got a load of crew on holiday burning their 2020 leave!!
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,559
"Plenty of Stagecoach service buses in evidence between Swindon and Cheltenham today. I wonder why staff shortages seem to be such a big thing in the railway industry compared to other transport sectors?"

They possibly don't get sick pay for the first three days and have strict attendence regimes that see them fired if they go sick too often. No year long training for replacement bus drivers.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,470
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
The solution is to pay the employee for untaken leave (ie. buy the holiday allowance from them). However, the accountants like this even less!
Well it financially compensates for the lost leave but doesn't allow for the need for a proper break from work which in a safety critical role is actually pretty f*#%ing important! <(
Can quite image the thread on here next summer because GWR had to cancel a load of services because they've got a load of crew on holiday burning their 2020 leave!!
Exactly!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top