TheGrandWazoo
Veteran Member
It doesn't, but is that offset, to some extent, by the fact that many people don't like buses very much?
So they wouldn't get a feeder bus anyway?
It doesn't, but is that offset, to some extent, by the fact that many people don't like buses very much?
The cost quoted was for an Arriva sole operator ticket versus a subsidised ticket by Merseytravel, the PTE. You'll be taking money from bus operators and putting it into fares so you end up no better or worse off until passengers give up on the network as they don't like changing modes and then you end up worse off than you were before. I really don't get what you are trying to achieve here as everything suggested just leads to money being moved elsewhere and it all leads to a negative effect on the publics usage.
Berlin is extremely different to Birkenhead in many ways and I think as TGW said, you are looking at this in a very narrow minded way. What works in Berlin is extremely different to what works in the UK.
So they wouldn't get a feeder bus anyway?
Integrated fares are kind of already there. Merseytravel fares are the multi operator, multi modal fares. They work. What doesn't work however is forcing people onto certain transport modes and as I have said, you are taking money from one area to give it to another. No actual financial benefit. It does however upset passengers being forced to change modes. If people want to change, they can and no one would stop them but as soon as you take choice away from people, they end up going to their cars. The Covid Bus Grant Funding will likely not be around forever and in which case, this discussion flies out of the window (for Liverpool at least). Bus usage is around 60% now and so the grant funding isn't topping up as much as it was. When covid goes back to a manageable level and life returns to a form of normal (new or old normal), the grant will likely go and bus operators left to deal with the frequencies.Even TGW, despite his reservations, seems open to the concept of changing modes and integrated fares in some circumstances. How can you be so sure that integrated fares wouldn't work in the Liverpool area?
Integrated fares are kind of already there. Merseytravel fares are the multi operator, multi modal fares. They work.
Child tickets are 95% Merseytravel MyTickets, not the operator specific ones. Operators have but don't really sell their own child tickets anymore (unless someone is travelling out of the area) because the MyTicket is subsidised so cheaply, there is no demand for normal tickets.They do, but bus only fares (including the Merseytravel Solo) exist and are cheaper (and in the case of operator specific seasons are easier to buy as the bus driver sells them). That skews demand. Those tickets should not exist at all; there should be one set of fares for all modes and all operators in a city area (ideally zonal; Merseytravel has an established plan for this). If there is a need for certain groups to have discounted tickets due to e.g. low income, those should be discounted for that demographic across all modes rather than buses being for poor people and trains for rich people as happens in London.
Even TGW, despite his reservations, seems open to the concept of changing modes and integrated fares in some circumstances. How can you be so sure that integrated fares wouldn't work in the Liverpool area?
They might put up with a short journey by bus to connect with the trunk journey by train, but wouldn't want to sit half an hour on the bus. That doesn't really apply in the Birkenhead example, though.
I do agree that the bus industry does need to raise itself above being perceived as a poor relation. That's not to say every bus should be an air conditioned Citaro but Transdev and Go Ahead (in the main) are showing that it should be more than a mode reserved for the socio economic D/E.