However, we need exposure to pathogens to keep our immune system active
Indeed we do - except exposure to COVID for some reason.
However, we need exposure to pathogens to keep our immune system active
No, I’m not being stubborn, I’m exercising my choice of where I want to shop.And I'd inform you that you were unwelcome to ever return to my store. Large stores will not suffer from the loss of one customer. Ryanair has made a successful business of telling people who are awkward that they aren't worth their while catering for.
Unless you have an allergy, in which case (a) say so, and (b) use whatever you've brought yourself as a non-allergic alternative in front of them, you are just being stubborn for the sake of being stubborn and just making the shop's job hard for no particular reason.
- Clean more often. Increase how often you clean surfaces, especially those that are being touched a lot. Ask your staff and your customers to use hand sanitiser and wash their hands frequently.
I'm allergic to the cheap alcohol based stuff. That's what two decades in the health service sanitising a gazillion times a day does to your skin. I carry my own foaming sanitiser, which I'm happy to show anyone on a store entrance and use in front of them, but I've still encountered silly sods insisting I use theirs, even when I've mentioned to them politely that some of my professional background is in infection control. Staff need to be better trained.Is it permitted for a shop to mandate sanitising upon entry, given that some people may have allergies to the substances used in the sanitiser?
However, we need exposure to pathogens to keep our immune system active, what effect is all this sanitising having? As an aside most shops I've been in don't insist on sanitising hands, is it's requirement? I don't know so is an honest question.
However, we need exposure to pathogens to keep our immune system active, what effect is all this sanitising having? As an aside most shops I've been in don't insist on sanitising hands, is it's requirement? I don't know so is an honest question.
Well here's an example of COSHH assessment of on alcohol based gel:
So maybe we do want to assess this a bit more. It also begs the question, do all places have a valid COSHH assessment for the types of sanitisers they are using? If they are a requirement of entry, should they be making this information available? I'm actually going to randomly ask when next I am advised to apply some.
And this is another concern. Short term it shouldn't be a problem, longer term definitely something we need to think about. As you say, we need exposure to keep our immune systems functioning.
So don't sniff your fingers, lick your fingers or rub your eyes after applying it. Seems a bit obvious to me.
Before you do, think about the effect this stubborn, picky and petty argumentativeness is having on low-wage staff monitoring these sorts of thing who didn't come up with the rules and have had a bad enough day already so far having been argued with about all sorts of things.
Just use it. If you hate it that much, stay at home and shop wholly online.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Long-term, yes. The couple of years or so at most this is likely to last (as every pandemic in history has, pretty much) is a spit in the ocean of a typical 70+ year life.
In the meantime, getting argumentative about this is just going to make a low-paid member of staff even less happy in their jobs than they already are. If you want to argue about it, writing to the head office would take the issue closer to the people whose rule it is.
Before you do, think about the effect this stubborn, picky and petty argumentativeness is having on low-wage staff monitoring these sorts of thing who didn't come up with the rules and have had a bad enough day already so far having been argued with about all sorts of things.
Well you are going to hate me for this, but the COSHH regulations are there for a reason. It is not unreasonable to ask a company for sight of the COSHH assessment, particularly where use of chemicals may be mandatory. So asking a member of staff if they know if such an assessment has been undertaken (technically their company should have informed them) & if they do not, who I might be able to enquire with. Look at it this way, you arrive at a store with say an automatic but unbranded dispenser. How do you know that what is inside it is actually sanitiser at all, or worse still some cheap crap that is poorly made? How do you know that this gel or liquid isn't actually going to be harmful to you? That's why COSHH assessments exist, and why they have to be made available.
Just use it. If you hate it that much, stay at home and shop wholly online.
I'm allergic to the cheap alcohol based stuff. That's what two decades in the health service sanitising a gazillion times a day does to your skin. I carry my own foaming sanitiser, which I'm happy to show anyone on a store entrance and use in front of them, but I've still encountered silly sods insisting I use theirs, even when I've mentioned to them politely that some of my professional background is in infection control. Staff need to be better trained.
I'm with @Bletchleyite on this. While I see no point in blanket hand sanitising please do not take out your objection to it on shop staff. They have a very, very difficult job at the moment and putting up with harassment, verbal and increasingly physical abuse from the public is not part of their job. By all means take up your objections with the Head Office of the appropriate retailer but please, do not take it out on the staff of the store.
So It's apparently 'immoral' to ask the vulnerable to stay at home, but okay to ask those who have difficulty with needless regulations to be forced into a life of hermitage?
Hold on a second here, who said I was going to object with the staff? I merely said I might ask them if a COSHH assessment was available & if they did not know whom I might ask.
That's still going to;
1. cause them unnecessary faff
2. delay others entering
If you want a copy of the COSHH assessment for the sanitiser used at ASDA, say, write to ASDA head office.
I've never been asked to use hand sanitiser at any food shops.Is it permitted for a shop to mandate sanitising upon entry, given that some people may have allergies to the substances used in the sanitiser?
Hand sanitiser isn't subject to COSHH anyway. Hand washes that happen to sanitise as well are governed by the relevant cosmetics regulations, dedicated biocidal hand gels are classed as medicines and are regulated by the MHRA. In both of these cases the onus is on the manufacturer to comply before a product is licenced to go on the market, any company like Asda that is using them on the door as a consumer has no requirement to go through any sort of regulatory approval.I will go out of my way to help "can'ts", I will not give a moment of the day to "won'ts".
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
That's still going to;
1. cause them unnecessary faff
2. delay others entering
If you want a copy of the COSHH assessment for the sanitiser used at ASDA, say, write to ASDA head office.
When I was at Tesco this morning (and indeed other branches previously) they didn't appear to have any hand sanitiser, only a spray thing for cleaning trolley/basket handles - which they should really give you to use when you get them not on entry after you've wheeled it across the car park (though this is only at a large store, not an Express that only has baskets in the entry, which works)I've never been asked to use hand sanitiser at any food shops.
Isn't that hand soap in a hand sanitiser dispenser instead of using proper sanitiser?Some places seem to use such thin watery "gel" that I'm sure it is being diluted. TK Maxx is an example of this - all their stores that I've been in it just runs through your fingers.
Isn't that hand soap in a hand sanitiser dispenser instead of using proper sanitiser?
Some places seem to use such thin watery "gel" that I'm sure it is being diluted. TK Maxx is an example of this - all their stores that I've been in it just runs through your fingers.
Isn't that hand soap in a hand sanitiser dispenser instead of using proper sanitiser?
They shouldn't give it to you at all. It's theatre, nothing more. That disinfectant needs about 10 minutes contact to work, and should be left to evaporate, and not be wiped off. Sanitise your hands afterwards, rather than the trolley and don't touch your face in the mean time.When I was at Tesco this morning (and indeed other branches previously) they didn't appear to have any hand sanitiser, only a spray thing for cleaning trolley/basket handles - which they should really give you to use when you get them not on entry after you've wheeled it across the car park (though this is only at a large store, not an Express that only has baskets in the entry, which works)
Yes. I would expect them to accept customers producing their own sanitiser and using that in front of the staff member, in case of serious allergies. Customers finding it objectionable may wish to shop online or elsewhere.Is it permitted for a shop to mandate sanitising upon entry, given that some people may have allergies to the substances used in the sanitiser?
Staying at a hotel in Eastbourne. On Friday we were asked what slot we would ant for breakfast.
On the second morning I called down to say we were sorry we hadn’t let them know what slot we wanted that morning. Only to be told it’s the same slot every morning and we were 20 mins into our slot.
They said it was clear in the email instructions about our stay. It wasn’t and it wasn’t made clear when we made our first breakfast booking.
I can see nothing on gov.uk about breakfast slots.
I’m fuming and I will not be returning. I was about to ask about staying a third night, not now
They shouldn't give it to you at all. It's theatre, nothing more. That disinfectant needs about 10 minutes contact to work, and should be left to evaporate, and not be wiped off. Sanitise your hands afterwards, rather than the trolley and don't touch your face in the mean time.
Before you do, think about the effect this stubborn, picky and petty argumentativeness is having on low-wage staff monitoring these sorts of thing who didn't come up with the rules and have had a bad enough day already so far having been argued with about all sorts of things.
Just use it. If you hate it that much, stay at home and shop wholly online.
Why can’t people just be left to their own devices?
To be honest, in current times I'd probably use it if it was offered to me. Once. E.g. if a shop had sanisitier at the entrance, and also dotted around the store, I'd only use it at the entrance. That seems sensible to me.Observe how many people use sanitiser if it's just placed there with nobody watching it.
Yes, that. That's why.
(Clue: it's not about protecting the individual, it's about protecting others)
Likewise in Geordie NightclubsFrance. The segregation between male and female bogs seems to only be an advisory too.
Just been told at Starbucks that I now have a 1 hour limit on how long I can sit in their store.
No real reason given - is this government guidelines?
Regardless - I'm fuming, I now can't do my university work. WTH am I supposed to do now????