As a uni student myself, I think that this would be a terrible idea if implemented across the board for all students. If we're being real, part of the attraction of university for the school leavers is potentially living away from home (in halls or other accommodation), meeting new people, clubbing etc. It's been part of the university life for decades. Whilst that may be temporarily paused just now, it cannot be a long-term measure otherwise numbers will probably decrease. One would also pick up a lot of life skills at university, but that just doesn't happen if doing it through a computer screen and likely from their bedroom.
This would also be far more complicated for the uni staff. They are busy as it is - some of them teach several hours of classes in a row whilst others are in the research field so they wouldn't have the time to be doing Q&A's afterwards. Recording lectures could also potentially be time consuming.
Finally, it would be a total waste of campus space.
I may not have been clear, the suggestion was that it was something which was done primarily for students from overseas.
That said it could be useful for mature students and for some modules for everyone.
Whilst recording lectures would be time consuming to do initially over time it could reduce the amount of time which staff spend lecturing. In that rather than lecturing for (say) an hour they could do a 30 minute Q&A, freeing up time to then do other stuff.
As an example current timetable:
09:00 - 10:00 - first year lecture a
10:00 - 11:00 - second year lecture a
11:00 - 12:00 - third year lecture a
13:00 - 14:00 - first year lecture b
14:00- 15:00 - second year lecture b
15:00- 16:00 - third year lecture c
16:00 - 16:30 - admin
16:30 - 17:30 - research
Future timetable:
09:00 - 9:50 - admin
09:50 - 10:30 - Q&A first year a
10:40 - 11:10 - Q&A second year a
11:15 - 1145 - Q&A third year a
11:50 - 12:30 - Q&A first year b
13:30 - 14-10 - Q&A second year b
14:15 - 1455 - Q&A third year c
15:00 - 17:30 - research
Therefore by having 45 minutes set for a 30 minute period of Q&A (5 minute break between, 10 minutes to review questions which have been asked during the online lecture & 30 minutes of contact time) that provides then with an extra 1:30 of research time on that day which they otherwise wouldn't have.
They also have time between Q&A's to go to the loo, grab a coffee, look at emails, etc. Which they wouldn't have had before.
Now that's an extreme example of what could happen (assuming full change over to online lectures), however it does show that it frees up their time. They can also decide which questions to answer in which order and so could have a (say) 10 minute section for answers which go beyond what's needed to pass the course, with titbits and testers of what to expect in future years and in other modules.
From a student's side they have the flexibility to watch the 60 minutes of lectures when they like, as long as they have done so by the time of the Q&A. They also can not attend the Q&A if they so wish. However at the very least they could drop out of the Q&A when the lecturer started on the stuff which wasn't needed for the course.
Clearly a reduction in use of lecture theatres would result in a need to look at it that asset could be used in other ways. However with a new normal it could result in campuses changing how they look over time (i.e. as there's redevelopment the number of lecture theaters are reduced and replaced with other facilities).
One thing which could change, is that with fewer foreign students in any given academic year it would be possible to provide university accommodation to more of the students rather than them having to live throughout the city. This could result in fewer student areas within cities and the problems that can cause. It would also free up more houses for more general living, reducing the need to build quite so many new houses.
If we assume that out of 10,000 students that 3,000 are foreign students, with therefore only 1,000 being at university for their final year. That frees up 2,000 university halls spaces for others to use. Putting (say) 400 homes back into the general housing stock. Repeat that over 50 universities (there's 106, so a not unreasonable number work to, it also results in an assumption of a total of 150,000 foreign students, when the actual number is about 450,000) and you bring 20,000 homes back into general use.
That's enough to reduce the house building target by 1% for a 10 year period. Which may not sound much, but does ease the pressure on the housing market. Again not by much, but probably enough to reduce house price inflation a little. Even doing so by 0.5% a year could result in house prices being £15,000 cheaper a 10 year period (assuming a £250,000 home increases in value by 2%/year compared to 2.5%/year).
Last edited by a moderator: