• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Camp Hill Line Reopening

Status
Not open for further replies.

Stephen Lee

On Moderation
Joined
7 Jul 2019
Messages
682
i wondered what rolling stock they will use for the Birmingham MS-Kings Norton Camp Hill Line Shuttle......But will Class 230s be a good idea......Or they will use 196s instead?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,950
Location
Airedale
I imagine it will depend on the eventual service pattern, but (NOT a criticism of 230s) I can't see WMT wanting a microfleet of any sort.
 

Stephen Lee

On Moderation
Joined
7 Jul 2019
Messages
682
But they have that already on Bedford to Bletchley?
Yes i know they already have that in Bletchley to Bedford, but looks like you misunderstood what i mean, what i mean is that WMT can order extra 230s for Camp Hill Line as well as NUneaton-Coventry-Kenilworth-LEamington line to free up 172s from the latter to SHL for extra capacity
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,466
Location
Llandudno
Yes i know they already have that in Bletchley to Bedford, but looks like you misunderstood what i mean, what i mean is that WMT can order extra 230s for Camp Hill Line as well as NUneaton-Coventry-Kenilworth-LEamington line to free up 172s from the latter to SHL for extra capacity
That makes more sense
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,682
Yes i know they already have that in Bletchley to Bedford, but looks like you misunderstood what i mean, what i mean is that WMT can order extra 230s for Camp Hill Line as well as NUneaton-Coventry-Kenilworth-LEamington line to free up 172s from the latter to SHL for extra capacity
Camp Hill services won't be self contained, they will likely be extensions of Shrewsbury services so 230s would be useless.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,637
Camp Hill services won't be self contained, they will likely be extensions of Shrewsbury services so 230s would be useless.
Shrewsbury? I thought these would begin at Moor St?

Would this line be wired? Or pointless given it ends at Bromsgrove?

And the chords towards Nuneaton don't need wires either, which I know is mentioned for relocating services from New St.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,529
I can't see how you'd get from Moor Street to the Camp Hill lines?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,682
Shrewsbury? I thought these would begin at Moor St?

Would this line be wired? Or pointless given it ends at Bromsgrove?

And the chords towards Nuneaton don't need wires either, which I know is mentioned for relocating services from New St.
How can they get to Moor St? The Camp Hill line doesnt connect to it, the proposed chords are years away. The line isnt electrified either.
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,892
Location
South Wales
Divert Hereford to New Street services into Moor street and perhaps extend TFWs maesteg to Cheltenham service through to Birmingham moor street
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,682
The chords arent off the drawing board but the stations are no more than 2 or 3 years away, therefore whatever serves them is going to come from and end up at New St.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,637
Ahh, my bad then, I thought the chords were in package with the new stations. Shrewsbury makes sense of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top