Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Penalty Fares, then?
Problem is they would have to staff it. And Central isn't the most pleasant of stations to be at.Or Barriers at Central?
Or just install them at Gwersyllt. Have it all remotely managed by the booking office in Wrexham. I’ve seen ticket inspectors on the service but they never do anything between general and gwersyllt. They just ask everyone if they have a ticket, when 95% of the train says no, they just send them to the guard, whos new ticket machine can only issue about 2 tickets in the time it takes to get to gwersyllt. The old machines were great, they could get about 10-15 tickets done. So this new ticket machine is costing them revenue.Problem is they would have to staff it. And Central isn't the most pleasant of stations to be at.
If they put barriers at central, then i guess they would have to install them at General too.
In my experience, the old barrow crossing at Shotton was really good and shouldn't have been taken away. Shotton isn't the easiest station to navigate so the barrow crossing was very useful.I agree that Shotton is a complete mess. On my most recent visit I encountered a distressed individual (not a regular user) who had just watched their planned train to Wrexham depart from the opposite platform as they were confused by the layout. They were on their way for a job interview and set to become a regular commuter. Fortunately I was able to identify an option via the low-level platforms and changing at Chester into a late-running Holyhead-Cardiff service so they should have just made their appointment. But it did make me wonder how much other business has been lost over the years by the inadequate arrangements.
That is coming but I can't see it making a huge difference. I know a few people who are more than happy to fare dodge on this line because in their words 'the guard doesn't care'.Or a single carriage train!
Or a single carriage train!
On the contrary, the 153s coming to the line will operate in pairs, because they've proved to be unreliable at getting up Hawarden Bank on their own.That is coming but I can't see it making a huge difference.
I didn't know that. In which case, we are no better or worse off than current.On the contrary, the 153s coming to the line will operate in pairs, because they've proved to be unreliable at getting up Hawarden Bank on their own.
The most common one on this line to avoid paying which I have noticed the past few times I have used the service, is to hide in the toilet. A few months ago I was on a service where somebody boarded at Shotton and went straight to the toilet, a woman pointed this out to the conductor who replied with "The state of that toilet is good enough punishment for not paying he can stay there" which I thought rather amusing
On the subject of tickets, I caught the last service from Bidston to Neston the other night, no sign of the conductor at any point on the journey on this occasion either.
For context, the reason for sending pairs of 153s to relapce 150s is that as 23m stock, they can't work the valleys north of Radyr (which is where Pacers need to be replaced pretty sharpish).I didn't know that. In which case, we are no better or worse off than current.
The lack of guard is rarely down to the guard being lazy. I know no one has said this, but it reads as such. Most times it’s because the battery has gone in their machine, it’s logged them out and they can’t log back in or, and this ones a cracker, the lock on the door to where the ticket machines in Chester has broken meaning if a guard finished after 6pm they couldn’t take a machine out with them at all. These machines really are a massive hindrance.
How about extension to Birkenhead North, where there is a third platform not generally used? Wouldn't work with the current timetable but with a half-hourly service and one train an hour maybe missing some of the smaller stations it could be a possibility.If I was doing a full fat job on the line I would be tempted to close Bidston and open a replacement a bit along the Wrexham line, at the old road bridge. Takes a stop and slow conflict out of the West Kirby line and puts the station nearer the housing.
Using a S&B TVM I can buy a walk-up ticket within about 20 to 30 seconds. There really isn't any excuse for the UI of these machines to be any worse.
This could work but 1, you would need some points from Platform 1 onto the westbound track (or the train would be using the slow line though the depot) and also, I don't think it would work in practise as the user group for this line is very proactive and will go ape if they find out any stops are being missed out.How about extension to Birkenhead North, where there is a third platform not generally used? Wouldn't work with the current timetable but with a half-hourly service and one train an hour maybe missing some of the smaller stations it could be a possibility.
The most common one on this line to avoid paying which I have noticed the past few times I have used the service, is to hide in the toilet. A few months ago I was on a service where somebody boarded at Shotton and went straight to the toilet, a woman pointed this out to the conductor who replied with "The state of that toilet is good enough punishment for not paying he can stay there" which I thought rather amusing
On the subject of tickets, I caught the last service from Bidston to Neston the other night, no sign of the conductor at any point on the journey on this occasion either.
The service used to terminate at Birkenhead North (1971 - 8). I believe it used platform 2 then, with Liverpool-bound trains using 1Ideally, it needs a third track between Bidston and Birkenhead North to avoid conflict with Merseyrail services as well.
The service used to terminate at Birkenhead North (1971 - 8). I believe it used platform 2 then, with Liverpool-bound trains using 1
I think it's the point of Birkenhead North being more accessible and having more trains through to Liverpool thus making it easier for connections.I'm unconvinced that there's any benefit in extending it anywhere other than Liverpool as a terminus, as the vast majority of passengers are going to Liverpool and so will need to change anyway.
A non-conflicting junction at Bidston East to remove conflict with New Brighton services would do more to keep things fluid on the Wirral line. It is the main constraint on the line as it stands, and would become even more so if electrification to Shotton brought a Merseyrail frequency of 4 tph.Ideally, it needs a third track between Bidston and Birkenhead North to avoid conflict with Merseyrail services as well.
Interesting to see up until the late 1960s some of the trains from Wrexham used to veer off after Hawarden Bridge and go into Chester.
Pacers now in use In west west instead before the halt for works at least one was doing it back and forth all day had days where only see Pacers here which is abnormalFor context, the reason for sending pairs of 153s to relapce 150s is that as 23m stock, they can't work the valleys north of Radyr (which is where Pacers need to be replaced pretty sharpish).