However, it does mean, effectively, a break of journey from a direct train that would have taken me to York anyway.
No it doesn't.
NCoC said:
you will be treated as breaking your journey if you leave a Train Company’s or Rail Service Company’s stations after you start
your journey other than:
(i) to join a train at another station, or
(ii) to stay in overnight accommodation when you cannot reasonably
complete your journey within one day, or
(iii) to follow any instructions given by a member of a Train Company’s staff
So unless you leave the station you are NOT breaking your journey. And even then you are not breaking your journey if you are getting a train from another station (e.g. Moor St to New St, Hertford East to Hertford North, etc..)
But what does it matter anyway? Break of journey is permitted on ALL walk-on tickets that I am aware of, with the exception of
some Off Peak (
not Day)
outward portions where an unenforceable (IMO) validity code restricts it.
I could, of course, get an earlier train to Eaglescliffe (there is one) but I'm always reluctant to do that given there are no indicator boards there (the last time I looked, anyway) and I would be stranded if the GC train didn't turn up.
I recommend using Live Departure Boards (LDB). If you have a 'phone but no internet access, you could ask a friend to text/call you.
Sorry if I have hijacked the thread.
No, not at all, it's the same flow after all!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If you are referring to the fact that the ticket was route direct, then it no longer is. It was recently altered to be route 'not Darlington' and so there is no question as to whether this would be allowed.
There never was a question about whether BOJ was allowed on a "Route Direct" ticket as the conditions clearly state it is permitted.
Regarding it's former status as route direct, there has always been a lot of debate as to what this actually means. Most though would say it doesn't refer to direct trains, but the most direct route, mainly because some route direct tickets existed between stations where there were no direct services! That opens a whole other can of worms though - what is defined as direct route? From what I know, this has never been comprehensively defined, and is probably partly the reason why most route direct tickets have now been phased out and replaced with other routes (for example, Hull-York, formerly route direct, now route 'not Doncaster' - this change has, debateably, increased the validity of the ticket by allowing travel via Leeds without any question!).
The debate centers on whether only direct trains are valid (ludicrous suggestion) or whether it is only the direct route that is valid (plausible) or, the only logical explanation is that the route(s) considered to be among the shortest within 3 miles (as per the RG rule that the shortest route, plus any route no longer than 3 miles further than the shortest route, is valid) plus direct trains. In other words, ignore mapped routes. It would only be invalid to change to GC in the first, ludicrous, interpretation of only allowing direct trains. This interpretation is ludicrous and ridiculous because it would have made many journeys completely impossible on tickets routed Direct. Therefore it can be ruled out as totally implausible.
It has been confirmed that ATOC are slowly removing "Route Direct", presumably they cannot be bothered to define it as direct trains and the shortest route(s) over which scheduled services operate.
The classic one was Carlisle to London "Route Direct", with question marks over whether it would be valid via Birmingham or Northampton, and indeed it could be interpreted to only be valid on the S&C and ECML via Leeds unless you got a direct train. It has now been renamed "Any Permitted" as the former "Any Permitted" has been renamed "Newcastle" as Newcastle is no longer a permitted route. Route Newcastle is valid for avoiding Newcastle as it's more expensive. Simple. Of course, the alternative of leaving the Any Permitted as it was and renaming Route Direct as "Not Newcastle" would have been too complicated for the people at ATOC
