The Reading arrival restriction is intended for journeys toward London in the peak flow.
I agree that was the original intention. But that was in the time of travel by
Any Reasonable Route and in these times where everything is resolved by contract I am not content to recommend travel where the restrictions specifically forbid it. The obverse also applies. I am happy to recommend travel where I think it is not intended to be allowed, but the rules are clear that it is currently actually allowed.
it is always the case for any journey where the origin is outside the Network area and the destination is inside then the journey from London to destination is unrestricted, this is an accross-the-board rule inherited from BR days that applies to all applicable Off Peak (SVR) tickets.
I agree that the rule you state was inherited from BR days. This continued until 1999.
National Fares Manual NFM 71 said:
A Saver ticket from a station outside the Network Area to any station via London is subject only to the validity of the 'TO LONDON' portion of the journey except where outward travel from Swindon, Pewsey, Westbury and Castle Cary via Euston is involved, when the restrictions above also apply.
By 2000, this had changed and the dreaded words
Unless shown otherwise made their first appearance.
National Fares Manual NFM 74 said:
Saver tickets issued for journeys commencing outside the Network Area for travel via London take the restriction from the origin station to London and return. Unless shown otherwise on the following pages, they are unrestricted between London and the destination station and return.
This did not immediately affect the validity of SVRs from the north to Reading via London, because journeys arriving at Reading from the west were still restricted according to the time of departure from the origin rather than time of arrival at Reading.
By NFM 91 (Sep 2005 - Jan 2006) the wording had become almost identical to that quoted by
yorkie above. The effect of this was that when the wording of the restriction at Reading was changed, tickets such as SVR Liverpool - Reading route + London ceased to be valid from Paddington in the morning peak. This had happened by NFM 02 (Jan - May 2009) when the relevant restriction at Reading was
ARRIVE: READING At or after 1012 .
Anything that suggests it is restricted between London & Reading is in conflict with that statement and I'm told that where conflicting statements applies, consumer laws state that the one most benefitial to the customer must prevail.
I would love to be wrong, but I'm afraid I don't see a conflict. The words
Unless shown otherwise cover the position. In addition, none of the internet site selling railway tickets will sell a Liverpool - Reading route + London ticket for the 0906 Paddington - Reading.
I do agree that, where there is a conflict in consumer terms, the
law resolves this in favour of the consumer.
The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 said:
7. - (2) If there is doubt about the meaning of a written term, the interpretation which is most favourable to the consumer shall prevail but this rule shall not apply in proceedings brought under regulation 12.
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19992083.htm
Regulation 12 concerns Injunctions to prevent continued use of unfair terms.