jonesy3001
Established Member
Depends on what livery the 323 will go back, nobody knows whats happening to the 323s yet.
That or another one of Porterbrook's crazy schemes.
What we see as sensible may not be what Porterbrook want to do with them. Remember they weren't sensible when they tried their first stab at the 323 debacle.I can't see anything more sensible than sending them all to Northern following PRM changes and new seat covers.
Only a tiny handful of 319s are on long-term lease at Northern. I think it's about 6? The remainder will be converted to '769s' or returned to the leasing company.I can't see anything more sensible than sending them all to Northern following PRM changes and new seat covers. They are perfectly suited to Northern's EMU needs as they are, and despite being quite old now still look very modern. Then scrap the 319s, they're old and unreliable anyway.
I can't see anything more sensible than sending them all to Northern following PRM changes and new seat covers.
Or just that they have to be done before the 2020 PRM deadline and the replacement Aventras won't arrive before then.That or another one of Porterbrook's crazy schemes.
siginficantly expand EMU only work?
No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s. If the 323s were operated in 6-car formations to increase capacity, that would be up to 38 323 units. Not far short of the entire fleet of 43.Only a tiny handful of 319s are on long-term lease at Northern. I think it's about 6? The remainder will be converted to '769s' or returned to the leasing company.
Nearly all of Northern's EMU only work will be covered by the 331 and 333 fleets. Unless you are proposing to retire some of those units, or siginficantly expand EMU only work?
The interior of the 769s are certainly an upgrade on the hoards of 150s that are currently operated by Northern.
In what way? The Class 319 interior is basically identical to the Class 150 interior (layout as per /1, seats as per /2). Indeed the seating as supplied (except the small number of /2 sets with Chapman seats) is markedly inferior.
A 769 beats a pair of 150s, but that is only because of the pantograph.
You forgot the extra space compared to a pair of 150d as a result of no intermediate cabs...In what way? The Class 319 interior is basically identical to the Class 150 interior (layout as per /1, seats as per /2). Indeed the seating as supplied (except the small number of /2 sets with Chapman seats) is markedly inferior.
A 769 beats a pair of 150s, but that is only because of the pantograph.
I think it may be a while before EMUs get to Harrogate, no wires.I would suggest if Northern are making Harrogate services 6 carriages with the 331s then the 323s could be utilised in a similar way on the busiest commuter routes west of the Pennines.
I think it may be a while before EMUs get to Harrogate, no wires.
No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s. If the 323s were operated in 6-car formations to increase capacity, that would be up to 38 323 units. Not far short of the entire fleet of 43.
323s would also be an order of magnitude better than 319s on the Liverpool - Wigan stoppers. The fairly tight turnaround at Lime Street can be a problem for the 319s, which struggle to keep on time.
I think it may be a while before EMUs get to Harrogate, no wires.
Or DC rail, as there was a proposal around 10 years ago to electrify Leeds - York via Harrogate with DC rail so as to use former London Underground stock.
I believe the franchise agreement rolling stock plan envisaged that 331s, presumably 3-car units, would replace the 323s on the Hadfield and Macclesfield/Stoke lines, because 319s would be too sluggish to keep to the 323 timings. 319s would work the Crewe and Hazel Grove services.Is that including the manchester lines as well, eg; hadfield, stoke on trent and macclesfield?
I believe the franchise agreement rolling stock plan envisaged that 331s, presumably 3-car units, would replace the 323s on the Hadfield and Macclesfield/Stoke lines, because 319s would be too sluggish to keep to the 323 timings. 319s would work the Crewe and Hazel Grove services.
AFAIK it was not publicly revealed how the 331 order would be split between the North West and North East.
7 years ago actually back in 2011.Or DC rail, as there was a proposal around 10 years ago to electrify Leeds - York via Harrogate with DC rail so as to use former London Underground stock.
It may be more than 5 going back to Porterbrook in 2020, once the PRM programme for the 323s is fully up and running, although tbh the 'final final' fleet plan has yet to be nailed down internally.....No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s.
That's the current word on the grapevine - Porterbrook see a future for 769s as it looks like there is at least one more customer about to sign up for them.However, if Porterbrook have any business acumen about them the will let Northern exchange the 319s for the 323 fleet if the 769 project goes well.
That still won't be a good indication, considering the mess of the refurb program.only way to find out if the northern 323s are staying or going is when northern start sending them for C6 and see which colours it comes back in old or new.
That still won't be a good indication, considering the mess of the refurb program.