• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern 323s refurbishment and cascade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,357
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
That or another one of Porterbrook's crazy schemes.

I can't see anything more sensible than sending them all to Northern following PRM changes and new seat covers. They are perfectly suited to Northern's EMU needs as they are, and despite being quite old now still look very modern. Then scrap the 319s, they're old and unreliable anyway.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,277
Location
Bolton
I can't see anything more sensible than sending them all to Northern following PRM changes and new seat covers. They are perfectly suited to Northern's EMU needs as they are, and despite being quite old now still look very modern. Then scrap the 319s, they're old and unreliable anyway.
Only a tiny handful of 319s are on long-term lease at Northern. I think it's about 6? The remainder will be converted to '769s' or returned to the leasing company.

Nearly all of Northern's EMU only work will be covered by the 331 and 333 fleets. Unless you are proposing to retire some of those units, or siginficantly expand EMU only work?
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
If you're competing to keep a product in service, then it probably makes sense to give it an advantage by fitting the PRM stuff. After all, other newer units that may be getting touted around and being far more suitable won't have the advantage of already being signed by existing staff, therefore reducing training costs. I thought many of the posters on here like competition? ;)
 

4-SUB 4732

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2018
Messages
2,150
Wouldn't surprise me if they have been given the money by the Government to keep them legal because the units will be late on West Mids and/or Northern.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
Only a tiny handful of 319s are on long-term lease at Northern. I think it's about 6? The remainder will be converted to '769s' or returned to the leasing company.

Nearly all of Northern's EMU only work will be covered by the 331 and 333 fleets. Unless you are proposing to retire some of those units, or siginficantly expand EMU only work?
No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s. If the 323s were operated in 6-car formations to increase capacity, that would be up to 38 323 units. Not far short of the entire fleet of 43.
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,022
Some observations on this:

- Porterbrook will let Northern keep the 323s for until end of 2019 at a peppercorn rate as no one else wants them. It's an apology for the delays to the 769s project while at the same time removes the need for Porterbrook to find increasingly expensive space to store surplus EMUs. Not to mention keeps Northern in their good books as realistically they are the only takers of the spare 323s post-2020.

- Some routes could just about - and I mean just about given their long carriage size - accommodate 6 car 323s. A busy commuter route such as Bolton to Alderley Edge (once electrified) route would certainly suit that. I would suggest if Northern are making Harrogate services 6 carriages with the 331s then the 323s could be utilised in a similar way on the busiest commuter routes west of the Pennines.

- Northern will not take the West Midlands 323s as they will not be required given Northern will have enough 319s and 331s until the end of the franchise in 2025 as others have already said.

- However, if Porterbrook have any business acumen about them the will let Northern exchange the 319s for the 323 fleet if the 769 project goes well. PB can convert 35-50 of the 319s to 769s while the older life expired sets can be scrapped for spare parts. Most of the 323s were built in 1996, are well-built and have got another 20 years left in them.

Letting Northern keep the 35 year+ 319s until the end of the franchise 2025 is a big gamble - it allows any new franchise and ROSCO to (most probably) make a new EMU order to replace the dated 319s. If this happened then Porterbrook would be in a position of having to write-off relatively modern sets in the 323s to increase leasing costs as there would be an over-supply in the EMU market. If Porterbrook are prudent, they would upgrade the 323s to 'Renatus' standard and secure the 323s long-term future on the Northern network, whilst the same time looking to convert more 319s assuming the 769 will be a success. The interior of the 769s are certainly an upgrade on the hoards of 150s that are currently operated by Northern.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,357
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The interior of the 769s are certainly an upgrade on the hoards of 150s that are currently operated by Northern.

In what way? The Class 319 interior is basically identical to the Class 150 interior (layout as per /1, seats as per /2). Indeed the seating as supplied (except the small number of /2 sets with Chapman seats) is markedly inferior.

A 769 beats a pair of 150s, but that is only because of the pantograph.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,370
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
In what way? The Class 319 interior is basically identical to the Class 150 interior (layout as per /1, seats as per /2). Indeed the seating as supplied (except the small number of /2 sets with Chapman seats) is markedly inferior.

A 769 beats a pair of 150s, but that is only because of the pantograph.

The big advantage a 319 has over a 150 from a passenger point of view is that it won’t be 2 carriages.

Apart from that the 319 is likely to be cleaner. However compared to something like a FNW-interior 150/1 (an interior which personally I rather like) there’s not much difference.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,408
In what way? The Class 319 interior is basically identical to the Class 150 interior (layout as per /1, seats as per /2). Indeed the seating as supplied (except the small number of /2 sets with Chapman seats) is markedly inferior.

A 769 beats a pair of 150s, but that is only because of the pantograph.
You forgot the extra space compared to a pair of 150d as a result of no intermediate cabs...
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
1,014
I would suggest if Northern are making Harrogate services 6 carriages with the 331s then the 323s could be utilised in a similar way on the busiest commuter routes west of the Pennines.
I think it may be a while before EMUs get to Harrogate, no wires.
 

jonesy3001

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2009
Messages
3,317
Location
Otley, West Yorkshire
No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s. If the 323s were operated in 6-car formations to increase capacity, that would be up to 38 323 units. Not far short of the entire fleet of 43.

Is that including the manchester lines as well, eg; hadfield, stoke on trent and macclesfield?
 

prod_pep

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2010
Messages
1,711
Location
Liverpool
323s would also be an order of magnitude better than 319s on the Liverpool - Wigan stoppers. The fairly tight turnaround at Lime Street can be a problem for the 319s, which struggle to keep on time.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
10,499
Location
Cheshire
323s would also be an order of magnitude better than 319s on the Liverpool - Wigan stoppers. The fairly tight turnaround at Lime Street can be a problem for the 319s, which struggle to keep on time.

Turnaround times seem to be a problem in a lot of areas. If Northern do keep / acquire the 323s, they should be allowed to keep enough spare capacity (319s) to allow longer turnaround times (assuming there is platform capacity). A lot of the problems around the region as a whole originate from Northern simply not having the capacity to allow anything more than a handful of minutes for these purposes.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
10,499
Location
Cheshire
Or DC rail, as there was a proposal around 10 years ago to electrify Leeds - York via Harrogate with DC rail so as to use former London Underground stock.

I remember that one, quite an odd proposal to say the least. Frankly Leeds SuperTram had more chance than that!
 

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,577
Mind you, there are a load of newer EMUs likely to come off-lease soon, particularly Desiro types, that could out-pace a 323 and hit 100mph to boot. I hope that both Northern Railway and their supervisory bodies are contemplating taking some on...
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,335
Location
Greater Manchester
Is that including the manchester lines as well, eg; hadfield, stoke on trent and macclesfield?
I believe the franchise agreement rolling stock plan envisaged that 331s, presumably 3-car units, would replace the 323s on the Hadfield and Macclesfield/Stoke lines, because 319s would be too sluggish to keep to the 323 timings. 319s would work the Crewe and Hazel Grove services.

AFAIK it was not publicly revealed how the 331 order would be split between the North West and North East.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
I believe the franchise agreement rolling stock plan envisaged that 331s, presumably 3-car units, would replace the 323s on the Hadfield and Macclesfield/Stoke lines, because 319s would be too sluggish to keep to the 323 timings. 319s would work the Crewe and Hazel Grove services.

AFAIK it was not publicly revealed how the 331 order would be split between the North West and North East.

The 331/1s are to be based at Allerton, but I don't know how many 331/0s are to be based at Allerton and Neville Hill respectively.
 

AMD

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
772
No, the franchise agreement specified a total of 32 319s, with Arriva intending to return 5 of them in 2020, after all 331s were in service. So 27 to be retained for the remainder of the franchise. With 8 converted to 769s, that still leaves 19 319s that could potentially be replaced by 323s.
It may be more than 5 going back to Porterbrook in 2020, once the PRM programme for the 323s is fully up and running, although tbh the 'final final' fleet plan has yet to be nailed down internally.....

However, if Porterbrook have any business acumen about them the will let Northern exchange the 319s for the 323 fleet if the 769 project goes well.
That's the current word on the grapevine - Porterbrook see a future for 769s as it looks like there is at least one more customer about to sign up for them.
 

jonesy3001

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2009
Messages
3,317
Location
Otley, West Yorkshire
only way to find out if the northern 323s are staying or going is when northern start sending them for C6 and see which colours it comes back in old or new.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top