• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Trivia: Fewest passengers per station call?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Llandudno

Established Member
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Messages
2,744
Location
Matlock
Recently travelled to Skegness by train, fascinating journey, Victorian infrastructure at its finest!
Train stopped at numerous tiny halts and very few boarding and alighting.
This got me thinking during my two hour journey from Nottingham:

Which stations have the lowest ratio of passengers per station call?


E.g
A station with 10 stopping trains per day may get 50 passengers per day - average 5 pax per train.
There may be a station with over 100 calls per day but possibly only 400 pax - average 4 per train.

I guess a supplementary question would be to include request stop stations such as Roman Bridge, Forsinard etc.

I look forward to the responses!

Only for fun of course!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bussnapperwm

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2014
Messages
1,527
Well based on my visit yesterday, Bordesley is dead when it comes to its parly train.

Not sure what it's like for the football specials
 

Eyersey468

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2018
Messages
2,597
No idea about average passenger numbers but Broomfleet station in Yorkshire seems to be dead whenever it's Parly train stops there.
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,070
Kildonan's average passenger per train figure is 0.03.

If the numbers are correct, that has to be a very serious contender, I'd think. That's an average of 33 trains for one passenger boarding or alighting. Impressive. That can't pay for the cost of putting the stop in the timetable :)
 

Esker-pades

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2015
Messages
3,784
Location
Beds, Bucks, or somewhere else
If the numbers are correct, that has to be a very serious contender, I'd think. That's an average of 33 trains for one passenger boarding or alighting. Impressive. That can't pay for the cost of putting the stop in the timetable :)

76 passengers last year for a timetable with 7 trains per day (Mon-Sat) and 2 (Sun). That's 44 trains per week, or 2,288 per year.
76/2288 is ~0.03.

One has to remember that southbound services have to stop anyway because there is an unprotected crossing just south of the station.
 

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
4,524
I was nearly there a few weeks ago. Had a bit of time to kill after taking a walk around Dunrobin Castle. In the end I bailed at Brora. After spending about an hour there, I can say I’d rather gone to Kildonan. It was a very strange place :lol:
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,912
Recently travelled to Skegness by train, fascinating journey, Victorian infrastructure at its finest!
Train stopped at numerous tiny halts and very few boarding and alighting.
This got me thinking during my two hour journey from Nottingham:

Which stations have the lowest ratio of passengers per station call?


E.g
A station with 10 stopping trains per day may get 50 passengers per day - average 5 pax per train.
There may be a station with over 100 calls per day but possibly only 400 pax - average 4 per train.

I guess a supplementary question would be to include request stop stations such as Roman Bridge, Forsinard etc.

I look forward to the responses!

Only for fun of course!

The Skegness line halts either serve school children, have a limited general flow or are basically historical leftovers.

Netherfield - little appetite for improvement due to poor road access and no disabled access but does have a number of people using it either in the peaks or for leisure flows (it's not unusual to pick up large groups heading for a day out in Skegness in the summer on the 0845 off Nottingham for example.as there's a well timed return train leaving Skegness at 1814).

Radcliffe - has had some improvements but has a comparatively good bus service so usage isn't great.

Elton and Orston - one or two occasional users. Not particularly well located and remote. Nearest feature of interest is an Indian restaurant. One of the few stations I know where it's totally forbidden to stop in the dark if the lighting fails in case you fall and hurt yourself and nobody finds you (I kid you not).

Ancaster - primarily school kids to Sleaford. Some commuters to Grantham and further afield.

Rauceby - school kids to Sleaford.

Swineshead - school kids to Sleaford.

Hubbert's Bridge - limited use to/from Boston and Sleaford, a small handful of school kids (much less than the other stations) and a few regular leisure passengers from Boston.

Thorpe Culvert and Havenhouse - there's very little at either. There's a couple of sporadic users at Thorpe Culvert but often they buy tickets to Wainfleet anyway - they often cycle to one of the other depending on time. Havenhouse has one or two farms nearby. The use can be described as occasional campers or people heading into Skegness if the car is off the road or similar.

Netherfield, Radcliffe, Ancaster and Rauceby could potentially do well out of a decent service (urban traffic issues could see a sensibly priced train picking up traffic at the first two, and there's significant housing growth at the latter two).

Swineshead - everyone drives. Schoolkids are catered for at the appropriate time of day.
Hubbert's Bridge - nothing much to build on. Stopping trains towards Sleaford cause big traffic problems owing to the level crossing.
Thorpe Culvert, Havenhouse, Elton and Orston - nothing much there any more.
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,070
The Skegness line halts either serve school children, have a limited general flow or are basically historical leftovers.

Netherfield - little appetite for improvement due to poor road access and no disabled access but does have a number of people using it either in the peaks or for leisure flows (it's not unusual to pick up large groups heading for a day out in Skegness in the summer on the 0845 off Nottingham for example.as there's a well timed return train leaving Skegness at 1814).

Radcliffe - has had some improvements but has a comparatively good bus service so usage isn't great.

Elton and Orston - one or two occasional users. Not particularly well located and remote. Nearest feature of interest is an Indian restaurant. One of the few stations I know where it's totally forbidden to stop in the dark if the lighting fails in case you fall and hurt yourself and nobody finds you (I kid you not).

Ancaster - primarily school kids to Sleaford. Some commuters to Grantham and further afield.

Rauceby - school kids to Sleaford.

Swineshead - school kids to Sleaford.

Hubbert's Bridge - limited use to/from Boston and Sleaford, a small handful of school kids (much less than the other stations) and a few regular leisure passengers from Boston.

Thorpe Culvert and Havenhouse - there's very little at either. There's a couple of sporadic users at Thorpe Culvert but often they buy tickets to Wainfleet anyway - they often cycle to one of the other depending on time. Havenhouse has one or two farms nearby. The use can be described as occasional campers or people heading into Skegness if the car is off the road or similar.

Netherfield, Radcliffe, Ancaster and Rauceby could potentially do well out of a decent service (urban traffic issues could see a sensibly priced train picking up traffic at the first two, and there's significant housing growth at the latter two).

Swineshead - everyone drives. Schoolkids are catered for at the appropriate time of day.
Hubbert's Bridge - nothing much to build on. Stopping trains towards Sleaford cause big traffic problems owing to the level crossing.
Thorpe Culvert, Havenhouse, Elton and Orston - nothing much there any more.

Thanks. Very interesting analysis of the potential of the lesser-served stations on this route.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,352
Location
Yorkshire
Wondered whether Ravensthorpe might be a contender for this one, but safe to say both Swale and Kildonan knock it into a cocked hat!
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,774
Location
West of Andover
I would expect IBM Halt to feature high on the list next year.

As Felix could probably tell you, the former buildings have been knocked down so the station feels pointless, and it gets a roughly hourly service!
 

Esker-pades

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2015
Messages
3,784
Location
Beds, Bucks, or somewhere else
I would expect IBM Halt to feature high on the list next year.

As Felix could probably tell you, the former buildings have been knocked down so the station feels pointless, and it gets a roughly hourly service!

It is pointless now. Any settlement nearby is served by Inverkip or Branchton. The person who I bought the tickets from at Wemyss Bay said that he never sells tickets there anymore.

It gets 249 trains per week, or ~12950 trains per year. That's just under half a person per train on average using the most recent statistics (6032). That should have declined substantially again when the next set comes out, both based on my observations whilst at the station and the statistical trend: over the past 5 years, patronage has at least halved every year.

Here's what IBM now serves (all my pictures):
IMG_20180504_155937.jpg
IMG_20180504_161054.jpg
IMG_20180504_181424.jpg

More detail.
 

Esker-pades

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2015
Messages
3,784
Location
Beds, Bucks, or somewhere else
Looking at the top 5 least used stations overall, there is quite a variation in number of passengers per train.
Barry Links: 24 people and 624 trains - 0.04 passengers per train
Teesside Airport: 30 people and 52 trains - 0.58 passengers per train (IE: it is more likely to pick up/set down a person at Teesside Airport than not)
Breich: 48 people and 624 trains - 0.08 passengers per train
British Steel Redcar: 50 people and 624 trains - 0.08 passengers per train
Kildonan: 76 people and 2288 trains - 0.03 passengers per train

Other stations of interest are:
IBM - 0.47 passengers per train, although I think that is inflated.
Duncraig - 0.12
Swale - 0.18
Llandecwyn (least used on the Cambrian Coast) - 0.35
Sugar Loaf - 0.08
Beasdale - 0.11
Thornton Abbey - 0.18
Gilfach Fargoed - 0.27
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,352
Location
Yorkshire
It is pointless now. Any settlement nearby is served by Inverkip or Branchton. The person who I bought the tickets from at Wemyss Bay said that he never sells tickets there anymore.

It gets 249 trains per week, or ~12950 trains per year. That's just under half a person per train on average using the most recent statistics (6032). That should have declined substantially again when the next set comes out, both based on my observations whilst at the station and the statistical trend: over the past 5 years, patronage has at least halved every year.

Here's what IBM now serves (all my pictures):
View attachment 53117
View attachment 53118
View attachment 53119

More detail.
All that land with a railway station they don't have to fund as part of the planning process will have property developers quite excited, I'd have thought...
 

thenorthern

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2013
Messages
4,714
Swale I think as its half hourly but only gets around 4000 passengers per year.
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
Looks like the site is only recently cleared though... saves them having to do it themselves now.
Also question of land use restriction, though I'd have suspected the council would have been all too keen to have something there!
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
If the numbers are correct, that has to be a very serious contender, I'd think. That's an average of 33 trains for one passenger boarding or alighting. Impressive. That can't pay for the cost of putting the stop in the timetable :)
Id say that some of the numbers arent that accurate. I quite regularly travelled on one of the 3 trains a day that stops at Doleham Station on Marshlink and over 10 years went past without me seeing anybody get on or off. The station useage figures have in the past been as high as 28,000 and are now around 4000 but even that's wildly optimistic.
The other Marshlink halts have regular passengers but I think that Doleham only has the occasional walker that gets off there and walks in to Rye or possibly an enthusiast or two. Bizarrely as its a Southern station it has a TVM with full TOD facilities and a PIS built in to the help point which is linked to the outside world by a satelite link as their are no telephone lines at the station.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,405
All these figures are for tickets sold to the destination. In other words they won't include passengers using rovers or tickets to other destinations and taking a break of journey. So at least some will really be higher. I doubt IBM Halt falls into that category though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top