• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

What irritates you?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aussie_Rail

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2008
Messages
560
Location
London, Great Britain!
Like the current 'recession' we're experiencing! :lol:
Well that too, haha, I'm lucky that Australia did not joined that group, but I'm referring to something that was on local TV that was completely blown out of proportion and then it was totally ridiculed by an idiot American who was also on that show. What irritated me was, the stupid American for being so uptight, then later it turns out he was hypocritical then the rival TV networks for blowing it out of proportion and making a mountain out of a mole hill.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
The Conservatives pretending to be the saviours of the UK. Just wait until they're in power, then you'll all realise just what you've done...!
I suspect it'll be more a case of first we'll see what a disaster New Labour has really been. So what irritates me (in this area)? People who are "not going to vote against Labour now when I've voted for them all my life", without thinking and seeing the differences between the party of Brown and that of even Wilson for heaven's sake (and that was bad enough).
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
The Tories aren't going to be great, but they'll do a lot better than Labour. If nothing else, at least they're the ones being honest about cuts in spending.
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
People who are going to blame the Tories for all the cuts and changes they are forced to make to save our country from the awful mess that Blair and Brown dumped us in.

Hmm, what 'awful mess' would that be?
Article

Let's start with a few facts that have been forgotten. Britain went into this recession with one of the lowest debt levels in the developed world. According to the International Monetary Fund, Japan's debt in 2008 was 198 per cent of national GDP, Italy's was 104 per cent, Germany's was 76 per cent, France's was 65 per cent, the US's was 61 per cent, and Britain's was 43 per cent. All countries have rapidly increased borrowing during this recession – for very good reasons we'll get to in a second – and Britain has nudged closer to the middle of the league table. But to claim, as Cameron does, that Gordon Brown had "racked up debts in the good times" so we "can't afford more" is simply untrue.

Cameron and George Osborne say that a national debt at 75 per cent of GDP makes a country "bust." Using this measure, the most successful economies in the world are bankrupt, and have been for a long time. Japan has apparently been trebly "bust" since the 1970s, yet it has just elected a government committed to higher public spending. The US, Germany – "bust" and "bust", yet spending more.

Oh, and Britain has been "bust" for almost its entire history since the 1750s if Cameron's standard is right. There have only been two 40-year periods when we had a debt that dipped below Cameron's supposed catastrophe-level: the end of the 19th century, and from the 1970s to now.

Don't forget the current 'mess' has been forced on us by greedy bankers - Cameron's sort of people. Why should ordinary workers have to pay for the banker's greed?
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
......Don't forget the current 'mess' has been forced on us by greedy bankers - Cameron's sort of people. Why should ordinary workers have to pay for the banker's greed?
a) An alternative view might be that the banking crisis is only a symptom of the country having been run by an economic illiterate - GB (yes, i know he is an intellectual giant and has been absorbing economic theory since before he was born) - for 12 years. b) Those in power for the last 12 years have also been allowing the financial community to do whatever it likes, simple because they have had no idea what is going on. If a banker had approached GB and promised to grow cucumbers from moonbeams, GB would have nodded sagely and agreed. And there is no one in the NL government that understands. At least "Cameron's sort of people" within the Tories will have enough understanding to realise when others are trying to pull the wool over their eyes. Remember, politicians are really only interested in power for themselves (not even "the party"). If they understand that other groups are likely to jeopardise that, they take action to stop it. New Labour obviously didn't
 

BlythPower

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2009
Messages
864
Location
Kenilworth
:D

Priceless! The Tories are (in)famous for ther hatred of regulation. The wealthy bankers are exactly the kind of people that pour money into Tory coffers in exchange for being allowed to rape the country's economy. Tory MPs routinely act as 'consultants' for banks and finance houses and get lucrative directorships when they retire from politics.
 

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
Well, from looking at this forum, it seems alot of people hate buses. However, I only hate buses in the UK for various reasons:

They're so bloody expensive. I'm currently living in Exeter and an all-day pass around Exeter is £3.85. And no, that is a return ticket. Even a single from the city centre to just outside Exeter where my hall of residence (a 25-30 min walk) is £1.90!!!

They stop running at stupidly early hours. I used to live in Romsey and until 2007 the last bus (X66) from Winchester to Romsey was at around 23:00 on weekdays. Now, on a weekday the last bus is at about 19:20 so if you want to go to the theater, go for a meal in Winchester, or if you're a student at Peter Symonds who wants to do some work in the libary then forget it, unless you're willing to take the train. However, that's no use if you live in Hursley or Ampfield (two villages along the way). Ok the inhabitants of these two villages tend to be stupidly rich but just because you have an above-average income doesn't necessarily mean you prefer to drive everywhere, given the price of petrol and the condition of our roads (apparently we have the 2nd worse roads in Europe apart from Albania!)

Buses tend to be very uncomfortable and poor value given the amount you're charged (sorry, mugged at gunpoint for) when you get on. An adult return on the x66 is £5.40 for a 30 min trip and for that you can enjoy the comforts of a Dennis Dart, and be comforted by the relaxing sounds of crying babies and any squeaks and rattles emanating from the bus. Sorry to be sarcastic but for ****'s sake for a similar journey in Europe you'd travel on a coach. Why??

Almost no buses in the UK (apart from TfL ones and I think those in Oxford) have announcements telling you where the next bus stop is. Therefore, if you're not familiar with the area, you either have to a) keep an eye out for any bus stops and hope the one where you get off is yours b) miss your stop or c) ask the bus driver who probably won't speak English and won't give a toss. In the words of Samuel L. Jackson "Speak English mother****er! Do you speak it?"

Right, TfL buses are at least reasonably cheap and have onboard announcements but from what I've read TfLs fare collection policy borders on the obsessive. I read somewhere on the internet (don't ask me for the URL since I've probably forgotten it) about a mother who got on the bus with her baby but forgot to swipe her Oyster card. When an RPI got on board and discovered she hadn't paid she offered to but no, the RPI took down her details, she had to attend court, and was given a fine and a criminal record. All for what!! For a perfectly innocent mistake she was treated like a criminal. If she'd shoplifted a few bottles of wine she'd been given a £60 fixed penalty. This story really ****ed me off since it shows how ****ed up our judiciary system has become. Finally, I can imagine that if she was actually a 18 year old hoody from any rough part of London she wouldn't have been treated the same way, and wouldn't have had to pay the £80 penalty fare on the grounds she was from a deprived background. The judge probably discriminated against her on the grounds she was middle class

However, in Majorca, buses are run properly. I went there in July and a single anywhere in Palma (which has a population of around 600,000) is about 1.25 Euros. Certainly cheaper than Exeter. Also, the buses in Palma are air-conditioned and have visual and audio announcements. There are various discount cards and rover tickets available too though I didn't purchase any of those. One day, I went to Valdemossa to see the monastery where Chopin spent his final months. The return fare there was about 2.90 Euros, and on the outbound leg I went by double-decker coach, and the return was a single-decker. Perfect!

Sorry for the ranting, intemperate tone of this post but it is something I definitely have to get off my chest.
 

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
So? All she did was forget to pay the ****ing bus fare. As you haven't read the post properly I will make it clear that she did offer to pay.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,290
So? All she did was forget to pay the ****ing bus fare. As you haven't read the post properly I will make it clear that she did offer to pay.

But its the principal, the saying 'Give them an inch and they take a mile' or whatever comes to mind.

And its not like everyone else has to pay. :roll:
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,168
Location
0035
People who put sweet wrappers back in the tin!
 

Aussie_Rail

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2008
Messages
560
Location
London, Great Britain!
The wife talking rubbish when we're getting to a good bit in a film of watching the TV. It drives me mad!
Yes! That is so annoying! When I'm watching The Bill of an evening, and my brother comes home from work halfway through and then my dad asks him how work was and he to whinge and whine about it while I'm waving at him to clear off! lol
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,245
Location
Yorks
No that's not right. Just because you like it doesn't mean others will.

If you played Simon and Garfunkel there is bound to be others you don't like it. So it is as irritating to them as Rap is to you. If everyone just used headphones.... :lol:

I always listen to Simon and Garfunkle on headphones anyway - as presumably do most S & G fans hence why I never hear it played loudly :)

On another note:

The fabled "deflation crisis" in which everything mysteriously manages to stay exhorbitantly expensive.
 
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
535
The conservatives never seem to think about working class people, and they seem to be hit the hardest whenever conservatives are in power.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,168
Location
0035
The conservatives never seem to think about working class people, and they seem to be hit the hardest whenever conservatives are in power.
Did you miss Cameron's speech on Thurs then? Every Labour Government since the war has increased unemployment, and the gap between rich & poor has grown under Labour.
 

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
Did you miss Cameron's speech on Thurs then? Every Labour Government since the war has increased unemployment, and the gap between rich & poor has grown under Labour.

To paraphrase Mandy Rice-Davies: 'Well, he would say that, wouldn't he?'

Let's talk about the increase in unemployment under Thatcher shall we?
When unemployment was well over 3m for the first time ever in the country's history?
When interest rates were so high, and property prices increasing so fast that a Kensington 'flat' the size of my spare room was on sale for £90,000?
When she resigned in 1990, 28% of the children in Great Britain were considered to be below the poverty line, a number that kept rising to reach a peak of 30% in 1994 during the government of John Major..
 
Last edited:

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,168
Location
0035
What about the fact that there are 900,000 more people living in severe poverty than there were in 1997, the fact that the gap in infant mortality between the poorest and richest households has actually grown and that educational inequalities are expanding and social mobility is declining?
 

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
What about the fact that there are 900,000 more people living in severe poverty than there were in 1997, the fact that the gap in infant mortality between the poorest and richest households has actually grown and that educational inequalities are expanding and social mobility is declining?
That may all be true but it doesn't mean that this only happens under Labour. Unemployment tripled under Thatcher and I fear that I would happen again.

I have lived under a Labour government, a Conservative government and a New Labour government and as a 40-year-old working-class married man, I would rather live under New Labour than the Tories.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,194
Location
Yorkshire
Can we change the thread title to who irritates you? :lol:
The small minority of railway staff who have a "customer is always wrong" attitude. It's only a minority, but they certainly do exist, they are responsible for a lot of the bad press that the railways get and they also put people off travelling by train. If they worked in a hotel or a shop they'd be sacked instantly!
 
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
535
People who are given a position of power when they shouldn't be; i.e., nearly everyone in said position of power, everything from your friendly forum moderator up to the prime minister.

That's it, I quit. *Throws towel down, walks out*.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,245
Location
Yorks
What really irritates me is the minority of couples who when walking down the pavement seem to think that they have an inaliable right to go around like conjoined twins regardless of who they get in the way of.
Don't get me wrong - if I see a potential pathing conflict with any group of people, I try and get to one side so that we can both pass without any problem. However, in busy environments, one can inevitably get channelled towards the centre of a group of people in which case the group will usually part to allow me through - being that I am in the singular and it is further for me to trek around the group than for them to part. Heaven forbid, however, that I might actually end up having to pass between these lovebirds, some of whom seem to be so pathetically co-dependant that having to spend three minutes and two feet apart seems to unleash a torrent of abuse. I've yet to find reference to any law or statute which states that the dipping of ones wick on a regular basis automatically leads to the permanent right of way on all pavements for ever more.

Glad I've got that off my chest.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
People who are given a position of power when they shouldn't be; i.e., nearly everyone in said position of power, everything from your friendly forum moderator up to the prime minister.

That's it, I quit. *Throws towel down, walks out*.

Toodle pip.

Apple zealots...

Ubuntu 'specialists'.
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,603
What really irritates me is the minority of couples who when walking down the pavement seem to think that they have an inaliable right to go around like conjoined twins regardless of who they get in the way of.
Don't get me wrong - if I see a potential pathing conflict with any group of people, I try and get to one side so that we can both pass without any problem. However, in busy environments, one can inevitably get channelled towards the centre of a group of people in which case the group will usually part to allow me through - being that I am in the singular and it is further for me to trek around the group than for them to part. Heaven forbid, however, that I might actually end up having to pass between these lovebirds, some of whom seem to be so pathetically co-dependant that having to spend three minutes and two feet apart seems to unleash a torrent of abuse. I've yet to find reference to any law or statute which states that the dipping of ones wick on a regular basis automatically leads to the permanent right of way on all pavements for ever more.

Glad I've got that off my chest.

Good one!
Even worse are those couples who feel obliged to hold hands, yet stay about 2 feet apart, taking up even more room!
 

43021HST

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2008
Messages
1,565
Location
Taunton
Its not couples its groups of chavs who canot move from a shop doorway to let someone through.
 

thefab444

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
3,688
Location
The New Forest
Don't get me wrong - if I see a potential pathing conflict with any group of people, I try and get to one side so that we can both pass without any problem.

Potential pathing conflict! :lol:

I totally agree with your point though, it probably comes from them being safely inside their cars 99% of the time, where they take priority over the humble pedestrian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top