Another issue is that if you leave the platform open, you now have to keep watch on people who may be intending to jump. With a fence or barrier, anyone crossing would be easily spotted. Easier for platform staff or CCTV operators to look for.
It was temporarily fenced off due to the lift works, but I believe that's gone now.
Another example of a track having two platform faces is Ascot, where I believe a fence has been put up on the disused face. Guildford also has a disused platform (7), and one of the stations on the Barrow line
I suspect the Ascot services may have been the last slammers to use that track somewhere around 2004, as I think the WR DMUs on the Redhill line had been replaced by Turbos rather earlier.
Yeovil Pen Mill is another.Thanks, I wasn't imagining seeing that fence a few months ago.
-------------
Another example of a track having two platform faces is Ascot, where I believe a fence has been put up on the disused face. Guildford also has a disused platform (7), and one of the stations on the Barrow line
Glass fibre reinforced plastic fences (link to supplier) are quite widely used on electrified sections of the railway. The platform extension at Shepreth in Cambridgeshire is backed by a plastic palisade fence - you wouldn't know it wasn't metal until you get up close to it.tation staff advised me the fence is made of fibre glass not metal due to presence of the conductor rail in case someone stood on said rail grabbed hold of fence and made it live. Not entirely convinced, but seems plausible!
At both platforms at Ascot, it is stated in the Route Knowledge Information that “doors to be released on the upside (Station building side) only.”Have posted this before - late WAT RDG trains often cross to the up line at Ascot, presumably to keep route knowledge and keep the points free.