InterCity:125
Member
At Carmarthen station you sort of have to cross the tracks
Yeah, India is terrible for this. [snip]
However, what's stunning is that this tiny network sees 700-900 deaths per year (that's compared to ca 2000 in the much larger network in Mumbai). It's quite terrifying. Most are at level crossings, it seems. [snip]
It can be done quite legitimately in London. Not many (one?) places though.
Unless the man was actually struck, a far more useful call would have been to the police. Why stop the job!
"Nothing new under the sun" department -- my mind goes to a book by my favourite travel writer, Dervla Murphy. In the mid-1960s, she was en route from India towards Nepal, on an extremely slow metre-gauge steam-hauled train of India's North Eastern Railway. The journey was punctuated and further slowed, by a young man's being fatally run over en route. Dervla felt certain that this must have been an instance of suicide; on the basis that anyone who had wanted to, would have been easily able to get out of the way of the snail-paced train. Death by pure misadventure, much more likely to happen nowadays around Hyderabad, one reckons...
Though I've only read one of her books, eight feet in the Andes, I've been meaning to go back and start from the beginning of her travel writing.
It is quite common in France, especially at rural stations to cross the tracks.
Not usual in larger stations - but this one has it..
.It can be done quite legitimately in London. Not many (one?) places though.
Keep meaning to visit that location near Westbourne park, must do so after the next Charlton home match! Of course that's the only rail line in the area without a 3rd rail, which reduces the risk somewhat...
The difference between aOn a recent holiday I encountered two vastly different attitudes.
In Russia, the train would frequently pull up to a short platform and everyone would just get off where they were, even if that was in the six-foot of the station throat. Nobody battered an eye-lid to a family of four dragging cases off the end of the platform, along the ballast and over an open line in order to get to their carriage without having to walk through the train.
At the other end of the spectrum, in Japan, a lot of non-high-speed lines in the countryside aren't even fenced. However, almost nobody tresspasses. Even though there's nothing stopping them, they know it's forbidden. When I was there, I saw a local news show leading with a headline about a man who'd trespassed near a station. He hadn't damaged anything, got hurt, threatened suicide or even particularly delayed trains; just walked along the track for a few minutes. That in itself was such a rare occurance that it warranted headline news!
Curiously, there are quite a lot of level crossings on the west / southwest side of London, including around Acton, Kew, Mortlake etc. Not to mention various ones on the freight branches off the inner GWML, and a couple of others.
The GWML branches include a couple of foot crossings.
Also Charlton's LC in the southeast corner, and so on.
There are foot crossings and full-blown level crossings all around the third rail area. There's no difference to the average pedestrian (as opposed to trespassers...) because the third rail always stops beyond the anti-trespass boards, at least a couple of metres before it gets anywhere near the foot crossing.
Sounds very much like Lincoln then, where I think they have installed a significant bridge, and yet still people wait...View attachment 50007 At Poole they have a level crossing with barriers intersecting the pedestrianised high street. People lean on the barriers while th train goes past, network rail want to close it down because it’s a safety risk, but there is a bridge!
In Russia, the train would frequently pull up to a short platform and everyone would just get off where they were, even if that was in the six-foot of the station throat. Nobody battered an eye-lid to a family of four dragging cases off the end of the platform, along the ballast and over an open line in order to get to their carriage without having to walk through the train.

View attachment 50007 At Poole they have a level crossing with barriers intersecting the pedestrianised high street. People lean on the barriers while th train goes past, network rail want to close it down because it’s a safety risk, but there is a bridge!
There might be a bridge, but it's not suitable for pushchairs etc And many people, if not in a hurry are happy to wait and not have to climb up and down narrow stairs
This level crossing (Charlton Lane) gets busy after match days. Most people tend to use the stairs
At Poole they have a level crossing with barriers intersecting the pedestrianised high street. People lean on the barriers while th train goes past, network rail want to close it down because it’s a safety risk, but there is a bridge!
It's not so much a both-sides release as that older UIC stock just automatically disconnects the internal handles above 5km/h and releases them below that. Nobody has to actually do anything to achieve this.
The first time I learnt this I was leaning on the door flicking the handle and almost fell out.
Interesting. And then of course there was Hungarian Railways where I'm sure there's absolutely no interlocking and the guard usually gives the nod with the doors closing at about 30km/h![]()